{"id":302,"date":"2011-04-20T20:08:32","date_gmt":"2011-04-20T20:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/?p=302"},"modified":"2014-04-17T21:34:44","modified_gmt":"2014-04-17T21:34:44","slug":"attorneys-trust","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/?p=302","title":{"rendered":"Attorneys Friend or Foe ??? Attorney, the trappers Agent?"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is what a Judge told me, Paul Hansen: <\/strong><\/p>\n

” Also, tell your friend not to consult his lawyer because his lawyer is compelled to disclose\u00c2\u00a0your plan to the Court! All lawyers are a part of the conspiracy against: WE THE PEOPLE!\u00c2\u00a0 See: <\/strong>28 <\/strong>USC<\/strong> 3002, section 15a……..<\/strong> All BAR judges and attorney\/lawyer’s are members of a larger\u00c2\u00a0organization titled: <\/strong>The National Lawyers Guild Communist Party.<\/strong> They’re so large an organization and in charge of every -thing that they aren’t afraid to\u00c2\u00a0record it\u00c2\u00a0for everyone to read! “<\/strong><\/p>\n

>><\/strong><\/p>\n

Takes One To Be One!
\n<\/span><\/div>\n
\"\"<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n
‘attorn’ \u00c2\u00a0 vb.\u00c2\u00a0 1. To agree to be the tenant of a new landlord.\u00c2\u00a0 2. To transfer (money, goods, etc.) to another.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 [Black’s Law Dictionary 7th]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n
ATTORNEY’$,
\nFRIEND or FOE
\n<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
\n\n\n\n
\"\"<\/a><\/td>\n\"\"<\/td>\n\"\"<\/a><\/td>\n\"\"<\/td>\n\"\"<\/a><\/td>\n\"\"<\/td>\n\"\"<\/a><\/td>\n\"\"<\/td>\n\"\"<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n
Attorney; class that turns \/ tears, a-torn, twister of truth, “AT” law not ever “IN” law, never entering Gods truth.
\nAt-turn-ey – one who turns peoples titles to land, automobiles, property, away from the people and to the STATE. <\/p>\n

1950 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild<\/span> and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and ran by communists under definition. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the American people.<\/p>\n

<\/span>America’s lawyers are controlled by the judges, and don’t really work for you – that’s why they sell you out to the government, or to the big companies that pay bribes.<\/p>\n

<\/span>In the future I hope to reveal how one local man went to his niece (working for a major law firm in Omaha) and asked her to represent him against an ‘failure to file’ case with the IRS. \u00c2\u00a0After consulting with her superiors at the law firm she returned and said; “Yes I can represent you but I am instructed to lose the case, we are not allowed to prevail against the IRS (Government).” <\/span><\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
There’s some very special aspects about the way American lawyers are controlled by American judges, which is central to why America’s legal corruption is so much worse than any other advanced nation. Even if you are paying an American lawyer huge amounts of money, he or she doesn’t really work for you, and in fact may sell you down the river to the jail-house.<\/div>\n
 <\/p>\n

American lawyers are directly under the thumb of the judges and the government, and must submit to the culture of bribery and perversion of justice, or else face terrifying revenge. Lawyers, just like you, can be instantly jailed by an American judge on flimsy pretexts, and American lawyers can be quickly stripped of their right to practice law, and personally and financially destroyed, if they dare to criticize legal corruption. Lawyers who try to fight the system can find themselves not only dis-barred, but also criminally charged and jailed, and no other lawyer will help them. It is a horribly crooked system in America.<\/p>\n

This is different from other advanced countries, where lawyers are usually a professional guild, whose status and right to practice law, is under the control of only their fellow lawyers. This means that, in other countries, the judges and the government cannot easily ruin or attack the lawyers for purely political reasons. This is also part of why, in other developed countries, outside of America, you really do see brave lawyers fighting for un-popular clients, or challenging the government, and asking for justice.<\/p>\n

But in America, it’s different. Over the past century, the American lawyers lost the right to regulate themselves, and instead fell under the power of the judges. So American lawyers are afraid to do things in court, that the judges don’t want them to do. America’s army of nearly 1 million lawyers, is almost totally under the control of a few thousand judges, with their entrenched culture of bribery and fraud and miscarriage of justice.<\/p>\n

Some USA lawyers don’t like this, but they are helpless and can’t fight it. Most lawyers in America have, to one degree or another, signed up with the devil, to do things the way the devil wants them done.
\nThat means that any time you hire an American lawyer, he already is in a conflict of interest. He has to make the judge happy first. And if the judge wants to make the government happy, or make somebody else happy who is paying a big bribe, then guess what? You are destroyed. It doesn’t matter what you paid the lawyer. He works for the judge, first and foremost.<\/p>\n

So a totally unique factor in USA legal corruption is the amazingly dishonest profession of American lawyers, these lawyers who “play the game” with America\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s judges and politicians and police. It is a savage culture of legal fraud, where lawyers work with judges to rob and terrify people, especially minorities, but also foreigners, and above all those who dare to question the system.<\/p>\n

People accused of serious crimes have the “right” to a lawyer, but this may mean only a crooked lawyer who is stage-managing the victim to help the government and prosecutors. If the lawyer does not help the government, he can be put out of work and not “assigned” to any more cases, or treated badly the next time he is in a courtroom. This legal fraud is the core of the danger to those who visit America. A lawyer who is “representing” you in the USA, whether the government is paying him, or even if you are paying him yourself, may just be a stooge who is helping the prosecutors to put you in jail, even though you are innocent.<\/p>\n

The judges of America gave every accused criminal the “right” to a lawyer, not because they cared about the rights of the accused, but because it helps stage-manage the victim, with a lawyer who has to do things the judge’s way. In America, such government-appointed lawyers are the means by which hundreds of thousands of poor people are railroaded into prison. Some of these people were just foreign tourists, in the wrong place at the wrong time, and wound up rotting in an American prison.<\/p>\n

Some lawyers are fairly subtle about it, and their victims never realize the lawyer has sold them out to the judge and the government. Most American court cases never go to trial, never see a jury; it is the job of the victim’s lawyer to “sell the deal” that the judge has decided will happen, or else. This is how people accept a “plea bargain” so they accept going to jail for 3 years even though they are innocent, instead of going to trial before a jury.<\/p>\n

Because of the corruption of lawyers under the thumb of the judges, there’s a very fake and phony aspect of court proceedings in America. They are really fake “show trials” in many cases, sometimes very obviously so, where both purported “sides” of lawyers are actually working together for the government, or for the big corporation or rich person that is bribing the judge.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/span>Another true story which will be presented is about a young lawyer who just spent $100K to get a law degree and soon after he started representing a few of his friends in court the judge called him in to his chambers and ordered him to lose the case. \u00c2\u00a0The man was shocked and terrified, but fully aware of the power of the judges to destroy not only him but the firm he worked with. \u00c2\u00a0After a short irrational discourse with himself he yielded and his friends went to jail, with the full knowledge he had all the evidence to prove that they were innocent. \u00c2\u00a0A short time later his conscience caught up with him and also the fact that he was a part of a vastly criminal enterprise he dropped his law practice and went back to farming. \u00c2\u00a0Oh how sad. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/span>Yes lawyer tell me the same story occasionally, and then they most often encourage me to keep fighting
\nbecause they say; “You can present arguments that I can not with out being black-listed”, then they say I can not be seen talking to you. \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Another lawyer testified against the government and he has been bared from 13\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 (I believe) states as to practicing law, he claims that they (government) keep following him and prompting each consecutive state to pull his permission to practice law in their state. \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0It is so sad what People, in authority, have allowed to come upon us. <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/span>You will also find, in the American legal system, that you essentially have no recourse whatsoever against wrongdoing by your own lawyer. A lawyer can sell you out, betray you, steal your money, engage in malpractice, help out the other side, hide the evidence that proved you were right, or commit felony crime against you, and there is (almost) nothing you can do about it, so long as the lawyer made the judge happy, and the judge got his cut of any money the lawyer stole from you. (<\/span>Stay tune for more.<\/span>)<<< <\/p>\n

Things Hansen has Learned:
\nIf you want to cut a deal, hire a lawyer. \u00c2\u00a0If you want to win, study hard and speak for yourself.
\nHansen nev<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/span>er yields to Latin > Legal-ease, <\/span>sti<\/span><\/span>ck with words that you know<\/span><\/span>, and before you answer question ask them for the definition they are using for key words in their question.
\nExample-Pro Se = appearing <\/span>for<\/span><\/span><\/strong> themselves.
\n-Pro Per = appearing <\/span>as<\/span><\/span><\/strong> themselves. \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Believe me in a criminal case the judge will try to get you to agree to “Pro Se”.
\nPro Se appearance gives the court ‘in personam’ jurisdiction.
\nPro Per, the Plaintiff must prove up jurisdiction “if challenged”.
\nAppearance with an Attorney as representing you creates an automatic ‘in personam jurisdiction’ = not good.
\n>>
\nThe court almost always force an attorney on me and every time they have hurt my case. \u00c2\u00a0One time a judge even demanded that I have an attorney the next time I come before him, I assure you that this was done in hopes to guarantee by defeat. \u00c2\u00a0I know now how to stop this. \u00c2\u00a0I’ll give my stories of how the court appointed\/forced attorney greatly damaged my defence.
\n>>
\nYour odds in US Federal Courts:
\n90% of those charged take a plea-bargain with a guilty plea. (Usually prompted by your high dollar attorney.)
\nThe balance of 10% have a 90% conviction rate. \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0(Most of these have an attorney.)
\nLeaves 1% that are found not-guilty. \u00c2\u00a0My experience\/research is that at the minimum 10% to 25% of the people going into Federal Court are 100% innocent. <\/p>\n

Many are convicted by their lack of ability to defend them-self in a court of law. \u00c2\u00a0Basically the courts complicated procedure produces their own fate, but remember having an attorney almost guaranties even poorer results.
\n>>><\/p>\n

Attorneys are ‘<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/span>Officers of the Court’<\/span>:
\na. They owe their first obligation\/allegence to the Court.
\nb. Second to the BAR association\/buddies.
\nc. Third their clients. \u00c2\u00a0Yes last, far last. \u00c2\u00a0Do you think a local attorney is going to fight for you in anyway that may upset the king\/guy in the robe. <\/p>\n

Any court-appointed defense attorney for indigent defendants can not win their case, period. \u00c2\u00a0If you believe that the state\/judicial system is going to make an addition (provide you with a lawyer) that insures many of their cases end in a loss, just jump on the Internet and see the thousands of innocent people that are convicted each year. \u00c2\u00a0Did you know America has more people in jail than any nation in the world on a percentage bases.
\n>>>
\n$$$ CONTRACTING WITH AND ATTORNEY: \u00c2\u00a0April 22, 2008.
\nNever prepay an attorney up front if you can at all help it.
\nI had one attorney take $1600.00 from me for what should have taken three hours at $100\/hr. \u00c2\u00a0The guy pumped up the hours every way he could.
\nHe told me that he needed $1,600.00 just in case it goes to trial, it did not and he keep the money.
\nI have him in court now. \u00c2\u00a0But what are the odds of another attorney\/judge giving me a good judgment. \u00c2\u00a0I’ll put the entire case on this site when it is done.
\n>>>
\nSide Notes Below:
\nAnd when you’ve got your<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/span>social security number<\/span> you said ” I want some welfare, I want some workmen’s comp, I want, I want, I want … and you have my power of attorney to regulate and control me. I’m a fictitious entity. I’m not a human being anymore.” <\/p>\n

When you do that, you give the federal government power of attorney. Then the government gives it to their courts. You become a ward of the court. So, read what a ward of the court is:<\/p>\n

Wards of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind … Their rights must be guarded jealously …
\nBlack’s[Law Dictionary], Fifth Edition.<\/p>\n

His [attorney] first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and whenever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Corpus Juris Secundum, 1980 Ed.<\/p>\n

Clients are also called “wards of the court” in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.
\nCorpus Juris Secundum, 1980 Ed.<\/p>\n

Nobody here looks like an imbecile or and infant to me, but you claim you are, and the courts recognize you as such. That’s why you have to have an attorney, even if you object.
\n>>>
\nAttorneys were held in such low regard in England that the trade was abolished in 1873. The root of attorney is ‘attorn’ which means ” to agree to be tenant to a new owner or landlord of the same property”. This trade was firmly established in feodal law. as is the entire legal profession in America. The trade they practice must be “at Law” or in opposition to Law because what they do cannot fit within the 10 commandments.
\n-attorney c.1303, from O.Fr. aturne “(one) appointed,” pp. of aturner “to decree, assign, appoint,” from a- “to” + turner “turn,” from L. tornare (see turn). The legal L. form attornare influenced the spelling in Anglo-Fr. The sense is of “one appointed to represent another’s interests.” In English law, a private attorney was one appointed to act for another in business or legal affairs (usually for pay); an attorney at law or public attorney was a qualified legal agent in the courts of Common Law who prepared the cases for a barrister, who pleaded them (the equivalent of a solicitor in Chancery). So much a term of contempt in England that it was abolished by the Judicature Act of 1873 and merged with solicitor.<\/p>\n

“Johnson observed that ‘he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney.’ ” [Boswell]<\/p>\n

The double -t- is a mistaken 15c. attempt to restore a non-existent Latin original. Attorney general first
\nrecorded 1533 in sense of “legal officer of the state” (1292 in Anglo-Fr.), from Fr., hence the odd plural (subject first, adjective second).<\/p>\n

>><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/span> <\/p>\n

\u00e2\u20ac\u01537 C.J.S. section 4. \u00c2\u00a0Nature and Duties of Office.<\/p>\n

An attorney is an officer of the court with an obligation to the
\ncourts and the public as well as to his clients, and his duty is to
\nfacilitate the administration of justice. \u00c2\u00a0An attorney does not hold
\nan office or public trust, in the constitutional or statutory sense of
\nthat term, and strictly speaking, he is not an officer of the state or
\nof a governmental subdivision thereof. \u00c2\u00a0Rather, as held in many
\ndecisions, he is an officer of the court, before which he has been
\nadmitted to practice. \u00c2\u00a0An attorney is not the court or one of its
\nministerial officers, or a law enforcement officer. \u00c2\u00a0He is, however,
\nin a sense an officer of the state, with an obligation to the courts
\nand to the public no less significant than his obligation to his
\nclients. \u00c2\u00a0Thus, an attorney occupies a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153dual position\u00e2\u20ac\u009d which imposes
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153dual obligations.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00c2\u00a0His first duty is to the courts and the public,
\nnot to the client, and wherever the duties his client conflict with
\nthose he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of
\njustice, the former must yield to the latter. \u00c2\u00a0The office of attorney
\nis indispensable to the administration of justice and is intimate and
\npeculiar in its relation to, and vital to the well being of the
\ncourt. \u00c2\u00a0An attorney has a duty to aid the court in seeing that actions
\nand proceedings in which he is engaged as counsel are conducted in a
\ndignified and orderly manner, free from passion and personal
\nanimosities, and that all causes brought to an issue are tried and
\ndecided on their merits only, to aid the court in seeing that justice
\nis done, and to aid any effort under the court\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s direction to root out
\ncorruption and fraud. \u00c2\u00a0An attorney has also the duty to devote his
\nability, \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0skill, and diligence along ethical and professional lines
\nto the interests of his client, and to refrain from entering into any
\nalliance or incurring any obligation connected with the litigation in
\nwhich he is engaged as counsel that would place him in a position
\nwhere his personal interests would be adverse to those of his
\nclient.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00c2\u00a0And;<\/p>\n

Now all of you can see the truth that this . . . \u00c2\u00a0\u00e2\u20ac\u0153dual position and
\nobligation,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d further deprives all American Citizen\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s of their
\nsubstantive rights to the due process of law. \u00c2\u00a0When before their
\n\u00e2\u20ac\u0153tribunals\u00e2\u20ac\u009d \u00e2\u20ac\u201c the attorney\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s . . . \u00e2\u20ac\u0153first duty is to the courts and
\nthe public, not to the client.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n

Did any ATTORNEY ever ask you for a $________.00 for a RETAINER????<\/p>\n

Did that ATTORNEY tell you that a RETAINER was and is only a GIFT and
\na DONATION????<\/p>\n

Did that ATTORNEY tell you that he or she is NOT obligated to do any
\nwork for you on your case for the $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 RETAINER
\nthat you just gave them thinking that you just gave them a DOWN
\nPAYMENT to WORK ON YOUR CASE????<\/p>\n

A \u00e2\u20ac\u0153retainer\u00e2\u20ac\u009d is a sum of money paid by a client to secure an
\nattorney\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s availability to work for a client. \u00c2\u00a0The fee paid is
\nconsidered earned at the time of payment because the attorney is
\nentitled to \u00c2\u00a0the money regardless of whether he actually performs any
\nservices for the client, and the funds shall not be placed into the
\nattorneys trust account. \u00c2\u00a0Baranowski v. State Bar, 154 Cal.Rptr. 752,
\n593 P.2d 613 (1979); and the Washington State Bar News, Committee
\nReports, Formal Opinion No. 173.<\/p>\n

The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly
\nstated that: A \u00e2\u20ac\u0153RETAINER IS A SUM OF MONEY PAID BY A CLIENT TO SECURE
\nAN ATTORNEYS AVAILABILITY TO WORK FOR A CLIENT.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\nA RETAINER only pays for the AVAILABILITY of the attorney.
\nThe FACT is that when you make an appointment to talk to an attorney
\nfor a DUI, traffic ticket, domestic violence, driving without a
\nlicense, driving while intoxicated, negligent driving or any other
\nkind of case, they meet with you, they let you TALK for about 5 to 10
\nto 15 minutes and then they ask you for a $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 to a
\n$10,000.00 or more as a RETAINER so that you can secure their
\navailability only! \u00c2\u00a0The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar,
\nsupra, \u00c2\u00a0clearly stated that . . . THE FEE PAID IS CONSIDERED EARNED AT
\nTHE TIME OF PAYMENT BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY IS ENTITLED TO THE MONEY
\nREGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE
\nCLIENT, . . . and the funds shall NOT be placed into the attorneys
\ntrust account.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d
\nWow, the attorneys are so stuck up and think that they are so above
\nus \u00e2\u20ac\u0153peons\u00e2\u20ac\u009d or \u00e2\u20ac\u0153goy dogs\u00e2\u20ac\u009dthat you have to pay them for merely \u00e2\u20ac\u0153gracing
\nyou with their presence\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and that they consider the RETAINER earned at
\nthe time you are dumb enough to give it to them REGARDLESS OF WHETHER
\nHE OR SHE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT!!!!<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/span><\/div>\n

Attorneys often get a bad rap, but I believe that there are some (few) that actually hold fast to the truth, and honor God in all their ways. \u00c2\u00a0It appears that the very profession itself gives rise to what some lawyers have told me, and that is: “Having a ‘BAR’ accreditation is a license to steal”.
\nGod bless those lawyers that do not cheat the sheep out of their hard earned wealth.<\/p>\n

This page will give insight into why the “good old boys club” is so vulnerable to corruption. \u00c2\u00a0Remember knowledge is power, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.<\/p>\n

Now do not let the 99% of the attorneys give the other 1% a bad name.<\/span><\/p>\n

Click HERE<\/a> to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This is what a Judge told me, Paul Hansen: ” Also, tell your friend not to consult his lawyer because his lawyer is compelled to disclose\u00c2\u00a0your plan to the Court! All lawyers are a part of the conspiracy against: WE … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[85],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=302"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1026,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/302\/revisions\/1026"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}