{"id":355,"date":"2011-06-16T19:43:11","date_gmt":"2011-06-16T19:43:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/?p=355"},"modified":"2014-04-09T22:18:57","modified_gmt":"2014-04-09T22:18:57","slug":"e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/?p=355","title":{"rendered":"Exclusive Legislative Authority, jurisdiction challenge, promulgation."},"content":{"rendered":"

((Dr. Kent Hovind the World recognized Christian expert on the fallacy of evolution.))<\/strong><\/p>\n

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE<\/p>\n

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA<\/p>\n

PENSACOLA DIVISION<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 ) \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Case No.\u00c2\u00a0 3:06cr83\/MCR<\/p>\n

)\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a03:10cv487\/MCR\/EMT<\/p>\n

VS\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 )\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0SUPPORTING Amicus BRIEF<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

)\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0NOTICE<\/span><\/strong> of Written Law.<\/p>\n

Kent E Hovind\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0)<\/p>\n

Brief in support of the\u00c2\u00a0 Motion to Vacate, dated \/filed on April 18, 2011, by Hovind, pursuant to the Organic Laws of the United States of America and the territorial limitations set\u00c2\u00a0forth by the written law of the United States.\u00c2\u00a0 These organic laws are positive law and can be found listed as such in Volume 1 (One) of the United States Code as follows:\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 1. Declaration of Independence 2. Articles of Confederation\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 3. Ordinance of 1787: The Northwest Territory Government\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 4. Constitution of the United States and Amendments<\/p>\n

Brief<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

The organic laws of the land that the acts took place on, or type\/owner of the land that is the subject of this case, is found in the United States Code, under the title of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153ORGANIC LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, and these organic laws are:\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 1. Declaration of Independence<\/p>\n

2. Articles of Confederation<\/p>\n

3. Ordinance of 1787: The Northwest Territory Government<\/p>\n

4. Constitution of the United States and Amendments<\/p>\n

\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 I, Kent Hovind have openly declared myself as a \u00e2\u20ac\u0153free inhabitant\u00e2\u20ac\u009d\r\naccording to Article IV of the Articles of Confederation, November 15, 1777.\r\n\u00c2\u00a0Pursuant to these Articles of Confederation;<\/pre>\n
Article IV. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and\r\nintercourse among the people of the different States in this Union, the \r\nfree inhabitants<\/span> of each of these States, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from\r\njustice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free\r\ncitizens in the several States; and the people of each State shall have free\r\ningress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all\r\nthe privileges of trade and commerce,\r\nsubject to the same duties, impositions and restrictions as the inhabitants\r\nthereof respectively, provided that such restrictions shall not extend so far\r\nas to prevent the removal of property imported into any State, to any other\r\nState of which the owner is an inhabitant; provided also that no imposition,\r\nduties or restriction shall be laid by any State, on the property of the\r\nUnited States, or either of them.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/pre>\n
\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 The following from the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776\r\nrequires no proof:<\/pre>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153WE hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal,\r\nthat they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,\r\nthat among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/pre>\n
\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0The equality of men and the unalienable nature of their rights precludes,\r\n\u00c2\u00a0for example, the unlawful taking of the life of one man by all of the other\r\n\u00c2\u00a0men.\u00c2\u00a0 No unlawful act is made lawful by the complicity of the entire society.\r\n\u00c2\u00a0 The logic of a completely righteous society rests on a supernatural\r\nCreator, which is the premise of the First and Second Organic Laws, the\r\nDeclaration of Independence and Articles of Confederation of November 15,\r\n1777. \u00c2\u00a0Article IV of the Articles of Confederation actually requires the\r\nStates of the United States of America to grant privileges and immunities\r\nwithout requiring allegiance from those within the state who will not submit\r\n\u00c2\u00a0to majority vote and rule. Unalienable rights are not subject to majority\r\n\u00c2\u00a0vote, so they are secured in the Articles of Confederation by imposing\r\nduties on government without a direct means of raising revenue.<\/pre>\n
The Third Organic Law establishes a temporary government for the Northwest Territory owned by the United States of America.\u00c2\u00a0 The Northwest Ordinance of July 13,  1787 establishes majority rule subject to the supervision of the United   States in Congress assembled under the Articles of Confederation.<\/p>\n
The Fourth Organic Law, the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Constitution United States of America\u00e2\u20ac\u201d1787,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d is the official title given, in volume one of the United States Code, for the Constitution of the United States, which results when nine States ratify the Constitution of September 17, 1787 and George Washington takes an oral oath to \u00e2\u20ac\u0153preserve, protect and defend\u00c2\u00a0the Constitution of the United States.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 This<\/span><\/strong> Constitution makes permanent the House of Representatives established by the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787.<\/p>\n
Although the House of Representatives consists of Representatives elected by the majority vote of citizens of all the States, that vote can still have no effect on the unalienable rights of the free inhabitants of the states.\u00c2\u00a0 The legislative power of the House of Representatives is limited to the territory owned by or ceded to the United States of America, hence, the title \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Constitution of\u00c2\u00a0 the United States of America\u00e2\u20ac\u201d1787,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d confirms it is a revision of\u00c2\u00a0 the Articles of Confederation.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 That nomenclature alone should be sufficient to dispel the unfounded claim that the Constitution of the United   States replaced or superseded the Articles of Confederation.<\/p>\n
The Legislative jurisdiction of the United   States must be established, on the face of the record, by the accuser, shown as PLAINTIFF, before any of the written laws contained therein may be properly applied, for the Court has jurisdiction only by the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153fact\u00e2\u20ac\u009d accuracy of the pleadings placed before it by the moving party.\u00c2\u00a0 Essentially if the subject Land\u00c2\u00a0was not owned by the United States of   America, a United   States court can not have exclusive Legislative authority \/ permission to prosecute Kent Hovind, such is forbidden.<\/p>\n
In relation to the Defendant, there is no evidence on the record to support any claim that Kent Hovind is a citizen of the United States.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 To the contrary, of all practical efforts, Kent Hovind has openly declared himself an Article IV \u00e2\u20ac\u0153free inhabitant\u00e2\u20ac\u009d and reserves for himself all the privileges and immunities granted to him by virtue of the Articles of Confederation heretofore recognized as positive law of the United   States of America.<\/p>\n
Regardless of the deceptive practices of certain employees of government referred to herein as PLAINTIFFS and \u00e2\u20ac\u0153agents of the United States\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, the court must insist as I do that the territorial limitations of the United States be established with written proof of the territorial jurisdiction of the United   States before any attempt may be made to prosecute, or detain, Kent Hovind in any court of the United   States. \u00c2\u00a0An attempt to bypass the Defendants challenge, of exclusive Legislative\u00c2\u00a0jurisdiction, shall be deemed inconsistent with the Organic Laws of the United   States of America, and every codification of written law that has followed.<\/p>\n
Thus firmly establishing what any court of \u00e2\u20ac\u0153common law\u00e2\u20ac\u009d (\u00e2\u20ac\u0153common law\u00e2\u20ac\u009d defined as the English Common Law as it was used in the 13 American colonies in the year of 1780.), by like free inhabitants, would determine, if Kent was ever given his right as to a fair trial on land not owned\/governed by the United   States of America.\u00c2\u00a0 Then firmly establishing Kent\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s right of independence from the United States Legislation that is established in the United States Constitution and it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s relationship with the Land called the Northwest ordinance and like land as found in the following written law:<\/p>\n
DISTRICT COURTS \u00e2\u20ac\u201c Title 28 USC, CHAPTER 5 – DISTRICT COURTS -MISC1-\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Sec. 81. Alabama. 81A. Alaska. 82. Arizona. 83. Arkansas. 84. California. 85. Colorado. 86. Connecticut. 87. Delaware. 88. <\/span><\/strong>District of Columbia<\/span><\/strong>. 89. <\/span><\/strong>Florida<\/span><\/strong>.<\/span><\/strong> 90. Georgia. 91. Hawaii. 92. Idaho. 93. Illinois. 94. Indiana. 95. Iowa. 96. Kansas. 97. Kentucky. 98. Louisiana. 99. Maine. 100. Maryland. 101. Massachusetts. 102. Michigan. 103. Minnesota. 104. Mississippi. 105. Missouri. 106. Montana. 107. Nebraska. 108. Nevada. 109. New Hampshire. 110. New   Jersey. 111. New Mexico. 112. New York. 113. North   Carolina. 114. North Dakota. 115. Ohio. 116. Oklahoma. 117. Oregon. 118. Pennsylvania. 119. Puerto Rico. 120. Rhode   Island. 121. South Carolina. 122. South Dakota. 123. Tennessee. 124. Texas. 125. Utah. 126. Vermont. 127. Virginia. 128. Washington. 129. West   Virginia. 130. Wisconsin. 131. Wyoming.<\/p>\n
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945.<\/p>\n
Ever since the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 the “district” in federal written law has referred to the territory subject to the exclusive legislative power of the United States in Congress assembled, which was revised by the Constitution of September 17, 1787, to be the Congress of the United States.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 When analyzed, that sentence reveals that the territorial composition of each judicial district of \u00c2\u00a0the federal trial courts is the federal territory located within the outer perimeter of the federal counties that comprise the judicial districts of \u00c2\u00a0the United   States district courts.<\/p>\n
The above is what any graduating student of written law should know foremost, for is not foundational jurisdiction where every judgment has its force and effect of law, law as to a proprietary right, be it granted or held by force, and that is in this case the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153exclusive Legislation\u00e2\u20ac\u009d that is reference below, for it only applies to land that is owned, within the exterior boundaries of the state called Florida, for example, being more specific one would say the 89th District in the state of Florida, which is called STATE OF FLORIDA, for it is a inseparable subdivision of the United States which is a corporation as proven by referencing the following: 28 U.S.C. PART VI CHAPTER 176\u00c2\u00a0 SUBCHAPTER A \u00c2\u00a7 3002(14) (15)(A): (15) \u00e2\u20ac\u0153United States\u00e2\u20ac\u009d means\u00e2\u20ac\u201d\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00e2\u20ac\u0153(A) a Federal corporation;\u00e2\u20ac\u009d\u00c2\u00a0 the local District Attorney is limited to crimes committed on federal territory within the county.<\/p>\n
Needless to say that the District   of Columbia is undisputable known as USA owned land, then so must be the like District 89. as listed above as Florida.\u00c2\u00a0 The question shall never dissipate as to- \u00e2\u20ac\u0153does the Plaintiff have fact evidence, and does the record show, that the acts that Kent Hovind was accused of doing, where they done in the said District 89. Florida?<\/p>\n
Am I saying the local District Attorney that prosecuted Kent Hovind is limited to crimes committed on federal territory within the county?\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 That is exactly what I am saying and also what I have proven with the Organic Laws of the United   States of America and Title 28, Chapter 5 under Historical Revisions and Notes as specified in the United States Code as positive law.\u00c2\u00a0 What better proof than the fact that all government in the United   States is limited to the land owned by, ceded to and under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United   States of America.\u00c2\u00a0 In addition, all trial jurors in Florida must be U.S. citizens and \u00e2\u20ac\u0153residents of the State of Florida\u00e2\u20ac\u009d, which I also have discovered was never established by the PLAINTIFF’S in my trial.\u00c2\u00a0 The State of Florida is both the name of the government and the federal territory in Florida.\u00c2\u00a0 The written law in the State of Florida clearly states:<\/p>\n
CRIMINAL STATUTES <\/strong> 913.03 Grounds for challenge to individual jurors for cause<\/strong>.\u00e2\u20ac\u201cA challenge for cause to an individual juror may be made only on the following grounds:\u00c2\u00a0 (1) The juror does not have the qualifications required by law;<\/p>\n
Now knowing that all corporations created by the United States of America and referenced in the USC, are also undisputable, an inseparable entity to its creator the United States of America, and that it is clearly limited by written authority, one can not deny that that limitation included what \u00e2\u20ac\u0153land\u00e2\u20ac\u009d such authority can it act on, as evidence in the written law below, for no person acting for the United States of America can rest in ignorance of the written law, and stay justified, but rather if such occurs it has a duty to correct immediately:<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153To exercise exclusive Legislation<\/span><\/strong> in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And\u00e2\u20ac\u009d\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Article I, Section 8, (par.17) USA Const. 1787<\/p>\n
This is the beauty of the Land between Canada and Mexico for it is a land of written law as associated with all governance associated with the United States of America, a\/the Confederacy, and its creation such as is called the UNITED STATES, a corporation, and in this captioned case the STATE OF FLORDIA, a like corporation.<\/p>\n
Therefore ignorance of the law shall not stand, this captioned Administrative   Court, called\u00c2\u00a0 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION is herein noticed that it only has authority to enforce written law derived from the above stated \u00e2\u20ac\u0153exclusive Legislation\u00e2\u20ac\u009d of it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s written charter.\u00c2\u00a0 For was it not Thomas Jefferson that said; \u00e2\u20ac\u0153 In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 This was in reference to the very Constitution articles presented in this Brief.\u00c2\u00a0 How can any one argue with such a reference from the floor of the assembly that was\/is deemed the founders of these great states united.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 As the Pharos\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s of old say; \u00e2\u20ac\u0153So it is written so it shall be.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
Such is the captioned Court of this case, for it is not a free inhabitant judicial court but rather an administrative, statutorily governed, entity created only to administrate its subjects and acts on its owned Land, as a proprietary function, constrained by the aforementioned Organic Laws found in its own published written law, the USC.<\/p>\n
Such limited exclusive Legislation (territorial, proprietary, jurisdiction),\u00c2\u00a0 can not be enlarged or diminished by inadvertence, ignorance, mistake, claim, waiver, ordered estoppels, or force of arms.<\/p>\n
If the record has no evidence, or more importantly, if fact evidence is \u00e2\u20ac\u0153ever proven\u00e2\u20ac\u009d that the United States of America did not own the Land that Kent Hovind was alleged as doing acts on in relation to the charges of this captioned case, all acts of this caption Court is a nullity, having no legal validity, and most surly no lawful validity.\u00c2\u00a0 For truly the claim had to be brought into a court of jurisdiction in relationship to land not<\/span><\/strong> owned by the United States of America.<\/p>\n
No court of the United States, a possession of the United States of America, can trick, or hold, any free inhabitant into being subject to its orders (administration), written law, law of the (USA) land, for if the acts in question did not occur on land that the administrator had permission to govern, branching from exclusive Legislation, of the United States of America, by the United States, it is highly demanded that that any such order be vacated upon such notice.\u00c2\u00a0 Obey the gentle chains of the USA and US Constitutions and vacate all charges, against Kent Hovind, that this Brief clearly makes vacate-able.<\/p>\n
___________________________<\/p>\n
Paul John Hansen, as Amicus Curiae,<\/p>\n
Care Of – Paul John Hansen,<\/p>\n
Law Counsel<\/p>\n
1548   N 19th Street,<\/p>\n
Omaha,  Nebraska,<\/p>\n
Not a resident address.<\/p>\n
Certificate of Mailing<\/p>\n
I, the signed, Paul John Hansen to certify having, this same day of May 26, 2011, mailed the above ten (10) page Brief to the Court titled as IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION, 1 Palafox St. Pensacola Florida 32502, post paid, vi first-class, US Postal Service mailing. Mailed by Hansen as additional proof of Notice of the established written law.\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 CC sent to US Atty 21 E Garden St Pensacola, Fl 32505 for Kent Hovind as additional mailing Notice\/Brief.<\/p>\n
____________________________<\/p>\n
Paul John Hansen<\/p>\n
Click HERE<\/a> to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
((Dr. Kent Hovind the World recognized Christian expert on the fallacy of evolution.)) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION   UNITED STATES OF AMERICA\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 ) \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0Case No.\u00c2\u00a0 3:06cr83\/MCR )\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a03:10cv487\/MCR\/EMT VS\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 \u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[96,57],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=355"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":356,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355\/revisions\/356"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=355"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=355"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.pauljjhansen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=355"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}