- Congress is fully aware that there is land in North America that is owned by ‘The United States of America’, and the remaining land is NOT owned by the said Union. (26% is federal lands, says BLM – ‘Bureau of Land Management’, of the United States)
2. Land owned by ‘The United States of America’ is referred to ‘United States’.
3. ‘United States’ jurisdiction is a stand alone jurisdiction.
4. Laws that operate in land that is owned by ‘The United States of America’, which is identified as ‘United States’, is independent of the land that is NOT owned by the Union, which I like to identify as the American People’s land.
5. Generally all law is land associated, “he who owns the land makes the rules”.
6. If you are charged with doing activity (crime, or taxable activity, plus many other activities) that is subject to United States written law, they, not you, must fact evidence that the land is owned by ‘The United States of America’ before the court can proceed administratively. (All US courts are administrative, and not judicial.)
7. Just one example of this fact is the below instructions for making sworn statements in differing land jurisdictions, one is without, and one is within ‘United States of America’ geographically.
8. Relax, we show you how to make/file the written ‘challenge’ (not motion), without oral arguments.
9. Such has stopped many actins by city, county, state, and federal, court actions.
10. (((The People’s safety is in the People’s jury, and is not to be found in the United States courts.)))
11. Notice – Evidence of law distinctions –
28 U.S. Code § 1746 “(1)If executed without the United States: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)”. (2)If executed within the United States, its territories, possessions, or commonwealths: “I declare (or certify, verify, or state) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on (date). (Signature)”. (Added Pub. L. 94–550, § 1(a), Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2534.)”
12. Note of distinction – in the above land jurisdictions, jurat utilization. One is without, and termed as “United States of America”. The other being “within the United States”, note the term is lacking “of America”.
13. Generally – Affiant states that Affiant is not evidenced as withing, therefore is by default without, until otherwise evidenced.
[[ For Counsel Time – http://www.pauljjhansen.com/?p=2225 ]]
PS. I, Paul John Hansen, filed like challenges, hand written, for I was in federal custody, having no access to a computer, or legal material. In the federal court, the three documents disappeared from the record, and the oral argument also disappeared from the transcribed record, then the prosecution dismissed the case. Which I was told, by the US Marshal, as I was walking out, that was the only case ever lost by that individual federal prosecutor in Florida, and the only case won by any defendant, that went to trial, in the federal court, in the last 8 years. NOTE – I refused to have an attorney, I would have surly lost if I retained BAR licensed counsel.
