Protected: Why US Courts Ignore ‘Thou shalt not steal’, humanism based ‘SOPHIE’. under construction.

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in relativism | Enter your password to view comments.

The Mystical BOND – Mythology upon mythology.

THE Mystical BOND – Mythology upon mythology.

The none US owned jail/prison has a bond coverage in the event that the prisoner escapes or possibly dies by the negligence of the jail corporation.

The jail bond is almost identical to a grain storage bond (insured grain receipt certificate), if the grain is lost the bond pays the receipt holder.

If enough prisoners escape or die they lose there good standing and they can not get bonded and then they cannot take prisoners anymore. Congress requires the bond.

A ‘bond’ is simply insurance of/for specific performance.

The better the bond rating the better they look as an investment venture.

It is a simple business, and there is nothing wrong with it except God does not give authority for long-term incarceration. The death penalty, flogging, or restitution, and that is about it.

You can insurance anything. Athletes insure their legs, models insure their legs, this is not rocket science folks. Businesses get bonds so that people will use them without fear of getting ripped off or stuck in a huge liability insurance entanglement. Stock Brookes have bonds, drywallers have bonds, James has Bond (007). And yes those who make a living arresting and incarcerating people have bonds. And the bond has no great value to the investor, the company does, and good companies need only pay small amounts to be bonded, while poor, risky companies pay much more at times. Criminal arrest and incarceration is riskier than Jack and Jill’s lemonade stand.

The below is what has been passed around for many years, I think it is almost entirely baloney.


What they’re doing in these courts is all about Bonds. When you go into the courtroom after you’re arrested, they use two different sets of Bonds. What they do when you are arrested they fill out a “Bid Bond”. The United States District Court uses 273, 274 & 275. SF = “Standard Form”. Standard Form 273, Standard Form 274 & Standard Form 275. This is the United States District Court.
There is another set of Bonds and they are all put out by GSA = General Services Administration. I’m just talking off the top of my head because I have all of this stuff memorized. GSA Form SF24 is the “Bid Bond”, everyone should have a copy of the Bid Bond. The “Performance Bond” is SF25. The “Payment Bond” is SF25A and put out by the GSA.
O.K. So, what are they doing with these Bonds? What’s going on in the courtroom is that they are suing you for a debt collection. If you look at these Bonds, every one of these Bonds: the “Bid Bond”, the “Performance Bond” & the “Payment Bond”, all have a “PENAL SUM” attached to it. The reason for the “Penal Sum” is if you don’t pay the Debt, you go into “Default Judgment”.
That is what is going on in the courtroom. That is why all of these guys are sitting in prison wondering what’s going on! If you go in and argue jurisdiction or refuse to answer questions that the judge or the court addresses to you, they will find you in contempt of court and they will put you in jail. What they do is arrest you, then they hold you, basically until the suit has been completed. Once they get “Default Judgment” on you because of your failure to pay the Debt, they put you in prison. The attorneys are there to create a smoke screen.
What attorneys have been trained to do is to lead you into “Dishonor” or “Default Judgment”. Then the court puts you into prison then they sell your “Default Judgment”.
Who do they sell it to?
Believe it or not, the U.S. District Court buys all of these State Court Judgments. I don’t know why no one has found this out before. There are about 300 “re-insurance” companies that buy these bonds. They are all ‘insurance” companies. These are the people that are buying these Bonds when you went into “Default Judgment” and they cannot buy these Bonds unless they are Certified by the Secretary of the Treasury.
What are they doing with these Bonds? They have regulations governing these Bonds – there are 2,000 regulations governing these Bonds.
Commercial Paper; Negotiable Instruments – anything you put your signature on is a Negotiable Instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code which is the Lex Mercantorium. It’s Mercantile Civil Law.
The reason they use Lex Merchantorium in the courtroom is because everyone of you are Merchant’s at Law and Merchants at Law is anyone who holds themselves out to be an expert. Because you use commercial paper on a daily basis, you are considered to be an ‘expert’. This is also why they are not telling you what is really going on in the courtroom. You are presumed to know this stuff because you hold yourself out to be an expert by using commercial paper every day.
Every time you put your signature on a piece of paper, you are creating a Negotiable Instrument. Some are Non-Negotiable and some are Negotiable. Every time you endorse something, you are acting as an accommodation party or an accommodation maker under UCC 3-419.
An accommodation party is anyone who loans their signature to another party. Read UCC 3-419, it tells you what an accommodation maker is and what an accommodation party is. When you loan your signature to them, they can then re-write your signature on any document they want and that’s exactly what they are doing.
What the Federal Courts are doing is they are buying up these state court default judgments, called ‘criminal cases’ to cover up what they are doing. Actually, they are civil cases.
If you read “Clerk’s Praxis”, you find that what they call ‘criminal’ is all civil, they just call it criminal to cover up what they are doing. If you don’t pay the debt you go to prison, bottom line.
How many of you have heard of REIT = Real Estate Investment Trust or PZN which means Prison Trust? Prisoners are real estate? They own all the real estate because they hold the Bonds on them. You haven’t redeemed your Bond, so they didn’t close your account.
Here’s what goes on: A contractor comes in or any corporation could come in and tender a Bid Bond to the US District Court and they buy up these court judgments and anytime you issue a Bid Bond there has to be a reinsurer. So they get a Reinsurance Company to come in and act as Surety for the Bid Bond, then they bring in a Performance Bond. All of these Bonds; Bid, Payment & Performance are all Surety Bonds and anytime you issue a Bid Bond it has to have a Surety guaranteeing or reinsuring the Bid Bond via issuing a Performance Bond.
Then they get an underwriter and that would be either an Investment Broker or an Investment Banker. They come in and underwrite the Performance Bond which is reinsuring the Bid Bond.
What does the underwriter do with the Performance Bond? The underwriter takes the 3 Bonds and pools them and creates what is known as Mortgage Backed Securities. When you pool these MBS, they are called BONDS and are sold to a company called TBA, which is the Bond Market Association – this is an actual Corporation.
These converted Bonds, now MBS’ are investment securities and being sold at the international level. CCA is one of the tickers on the NY Stock Exchange. Others include; CWX, CWD & CWG. When it goes to Frankfurt = CWG, when it goes to Berlin = CWD and so on.
Remember, everything is commercial. 7211 7 CFR says that all crimes are commercial. If you read that carefully it says kidnapping, robbery, extortion, murder, etc. are all commercial crimes. Thus, you are funding the whole enchilada simply because you got into Default Judgment when you went into court and failed to redeem the Bond.
This is why people don’t win in court; cause they don’t redeem the Bond. You are the Principal upon which all money circulates, but you don’t want to start arguing with the court about that.
They are drafting you for performance. So, anytime the court asks you to do something they are drafting you for performance and if you don’t perform, you get into dishonor by non-acceptance. They are making a formal presentment under 3-501 of the UCC so they can charge you and they USE the word “charge”. They use the same commercial words on your Indictment, Information, and Complaint. They use the word “charge”, i.e., “the following charges”, “…he has two counts of charges”, etc.
Be as gentle as a dove and wise as a serpent. You can’t act like an insurgent or belligerent. If you do, they will treat you like one; they’ll beat you up.
What you want to do is settle the account…go to full settlement and closure; you’re running the account, you’re the Fiduciary Trustee over the account – tell them what to do. You’re the Principal and owner of the account, tell them what to do – tell them you want full settlement and closure of the account. You have to do this from the get-go.
In order to win in court, you have to redeem the Bond…

Posted in Bonds | Leave a comment

sovereignty, Defined, Case Law

“There is no such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it; All else is withheld.”
— Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)

Posted in sovereignty | Leave a comment

Probable Cause, Want, Case Law



Claimant has no record or evidence that any fees, court costs,
penalties, or any other financial medium is required to be paid,
or forfeited, to any court or policing agency without the United
States and within any state of the Union of States.

ADMIT – Libellee(s) listed within this document admit to the guilt of
tort and the breaching of contracts against Claimant under fictional
falsity, a cloak to disguise a collateral undertaking, and malicious
vexation by legal process to Claimant’s pain and injury.

The US Supreme Court has ruled that a natural individual entitled to
relief is “entitled to free access….. to its judicial tribunals and
public offices in every State in the Union” (2 Black 620; see also:
Crandell vs. Nevada, 6 Wall 35). Plaintiff should not be charged
fees or costs for the lawful and constitutional right to petition
this court in this matter in which he is entitled to relief, as
it appears that the filing fee rule was originally implemented for
fictions and subjects of government, and should not be applied to
the Plaintiff who is a natural individual and entitled to relief
(Hale vs. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43).

“The Fee is the statutory creature moving within the fictional
falsity as if it is presumed to be standing as the amortized
obligation”. Ryan v Motor Credit Company, 130 J.J. Eq. 531, 23 A.2d
607, 621

This is the fiction of law, wherein the fictional falsities are
perfected by devious means. Read Ballentine’s Law Dictionary.

Fiction. Something is presumed to be true, which is false.

The alleged determination of “commitment cost” of $ _____________
for alleged traffic tickets or court costs, fees, or penalties
requires execution as a “cloak to disguise a collateral undertaking”
in U.S. Funds and is “malicious vexation by legal process”under the
disguise/pretense of a “lawful” government to enforce the unwritten
Master – Slave relationship.

“Although probable cause may not be inferred from malice, malice
may be inferred from lack of probable cause.” Pauley v. Hall335
N. W. 2d 197, 124 Mich App 255.

“Malice is a state of mind and an essential element of action for
malicious prosecution and is to be found by jury from case, and
want of probable cause is the other element of action for malicious
prosecution which must be proved by plaintiff.” Lopez v. Modisitt
488 F. Supp 119 D. C. 1980.

“The laws of congress in respect to those matters do not extend
into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only
in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the
exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.” CAHA v. U.S.,
152 U.S. 211 (1894)

See the whole decision:

Posted in Probable Cause | Leave a comment

‘IRS DOCUMENTS’ must be signed by ‘IRS AGENTS’.

26 U.S. Code § 6065 – Verification of returns Except as otherwise provided by the Secretary, any return, declaration, statement, or other document required to be made under any provision of the internal revenue laws or regulations shall contain or be verified by a written declaration that it is made under the penalties of perjury.

I believe it is possible that through this appears that it is directed to you signing a 1040 tax form, or like form, but rather it is primarily directed to IRS agents that send you billing statements, or claims that you owe the IRS money.

Posted in IRS / Assessment / 6203 | Leave a comment

US v. USA, President of United States v. President of ‘The United States of America’.

I, Paul John Hansen, have examined this document below, I find that it is highly likely to be correct on all points. the Constitution ‘for’ the United States is a ‘tool‘ of the USA union.

The ‘Confederacy union’ has strong biblical premises, the US / ‘tool‘ is ripe with statism, statism is biblically defined as satanic.


Donald John Trump became President of the United States of America on January 6, 2017 Without Any Ceremony

Senator Roy Blunt correctly stated that the inauguration ceremony was for a President of the United States of America. Donald John Trump became President of the United States of America on January 6, 2017, when he won the Electoral Vote count in Congress. Senator Blunt incorrectly identified Donald Trump as the forty-fifth President of the United States of America.   Counting Grover Cleveland twice Donald John Trump is the forty-fourth President of the United States of America…..

Donald John Trump Presidency Presents Unique Learning Opportunity

The inauguration of Donald John Trump presents the unprecedented opportunity to reveal this truth about the American Presidency to the rest of the world. Electors appointed according to laws enacted by the State legislatures of the United States of America Union elect a President and a Vice President of the United States of America for a term of four years.  If the Senate makes no objection, the President of the United States of America is allowed to take the oral oath of office of President of the United States and the Vice President of the United States of America is accepted as Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.

On Inauguration Day, Senator Roy Blunt publicly combined the Office of the President of the United States of America and the Office of President of the United States so skillfully only my Students fully understood what he had just said. The three branches of the federal government, the audience within earshot and everyone viewing or listening got a dose of the truth about the American Presidency.

The ‘United States‘ is a ‘Federal Republic‘    The United States of America Is a ‘Confederacy

The United States of America is not a republic it is a Confederacy of States which have delegated some, but not all their sovereignty to the United States in Congress assembled under the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.  The name “United States” is used to describe territory ceded to and subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America. The name “United States” is derived from the name, “United States of America” for the proprietor of that territory.

The President of the United States of America Has Always Been Elected By Electors Representing the States of the Confederacy   

All the elected Presidents from George Washington to Donald John Trump have been elected according to Article II, Section 1, Clauses 1, 2 & 3 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, and the Twelfth Amendment after June 15, 1804.  The fixedness politics until fix itself  Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons” for their election to the Offices of President and Vice President of the United States of America….Donald John Trump need not be your president.  Being free means presiding over your own life unfettered from the meddling of government employees. Keeping your freedom requires constant education in law and government.  For the first time in the history of America, men and women are truly free to separate themselves from government despite any prior entanglements which may have been made provided that person is willing to  learn the law and the true history of the government.”

Posted in US v. USA | Leave a comment

Protected: RV, Instructions,

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in RV Travel Plate | Enter your password to view comments.

Fire Arm v. Shotgun v. Free Zone

Fire Arm v. Shotgun v. Free Zone:

(((Are Hansen Comments)))

Facts of the case:

An Arkansas federal district court charged Jack Miller and Frank Layton with violating the National Firearms Act (“NFA”) (((Federal Law applies upon federal owned land, liken to a military base))) when they transported a sawed-off double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun (((US written law states that a shotgun/smooth bore barrel of less than 18 inches is prohibited))) in interstate commerce (((Interstate commerce is transportation from one federal zone to another federal zone.))). In part, Miller and Layton argued that the NFA violated their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. The district court agreed and dismissed the case.


Does the Second Amendment protect an individual’s right to keep and bear a sawed-off double-barrel shotgun?


The purpose of the Second Amendment was to maintain effective state militias; Congress could require registration of a 12-gauge sawed-off shotgun if carried across state lines (((interstate commerce))).

  • No. The Supreme Court reversed the district court, holding that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual the right to keep and bear a sawed-off double-barrel shotgun. With Justice James Clark McReynolds writing for the majority, the Court reasoned that because the possession of a sawed-off double barrel shotgun does not have a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, the Second Amendment does not protect the possession of such an instrument.
  • (((I believe that a study of historical archives of the 2nd amendment would say little to nothing about the militia, and a lot about the ‘right‘ to possess any device you wish for defense. [Thus the bill of rights.] They should challenge if the location of the ‘firearm’ was in-fact evidence-able as being on a federal possession.))) Lawyer Hansen,
Posted in Firearms Defined | Leave a comment

Protected: US Bank can not lend it’s credit! CASE /Opinion/Law

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Bank / Credit Cards, Bank / Promissory Note, Banking/Money Issues | Enter your password to view comments.

Restraining Orders Against US Officials

Restraining Orders Against US Officials:


If you are a native born American,

if your travel is recreational,

if you travel activity is not associated with transportation of passengers or cargo for a fee (profit),

if your act is on US owned land or on non-US owned land (private property),

you have a ‘right’ to travel,


if a city, county, or state, officer has interfered, or threatens to interfere with you said right

you can motion for a restraining order from a US court

preempts further violation of rights on

land that that courts territorial jurisdiction extends.

Posted in Restraining Orders, Right To Travel, Automobil v. Motor-Vehicle, Travel / A Right / MSO | Leave a comment