Affidavit, Evidence

Affidavit, Evidence

A sworn written document (affidavit) is only evidence that a man is willing to attest to it orally if need be.

So all affidavit evidence can be stipulated to (pretrial) as true if the opposing party agrees, if not you must bring in a man to testify and the affidavit has no effect.

Affidavits are worthless on there own without acceptance by the opposing party.

Penalties of perjury only applies in a court of record, when oral testimony is taken, and is meaningless on the affidavit, though it can be considered by a common law court.

Posted in Affidavits | Leave a comment

Arraignment, how to challenge claim in common law.

Who is the man making a claim against me?

I wish to meet with this man to do my best to make it right with them.

Posted in Arraignments / Jurisdiction, Common Law | Leave a comment

NOTICE by – Lien, Levy, IRS must follow…..

NOTICE – Lien, Levy, IRS must follow…..

First it is all about NOTICE.

IRS generally sends you two BILLS for a tax due, generally thirty days apart.

Then, if you do not respond adequately in there opinion, they send a NOTICE OF LIEN.

Then, if you do not respond adequately in their opinion within as little as 3 days, they send a NOTICE OF LEVY.

Then, if you do not respond adequately in their opinion within as little as 10 days, they start noticing banks and employers to turn over money (your property) to them.

All NOTICEs OF LIEN are required to be recorded into your county recorders office, as evidence of notice to you and others.

Require that they, by letter, to send you a *verifiable bill.

*a bill that is signed by a man that will orally swear under penalties of purjury as to the accuracy of the bill.

Generally no IRS agent will take on this liability and the IRS claim will never be established and if they proceed without verification that man attempting to collect on you can then be sued in a court of record, common law, pursuant to Article III court of the Constitution of the United States.

 

Posted in IRS, IRS / Assessment / 6203, IRS / TAX COURT / NO, IRS 6203 Demand, IRS Liens, Levy, Lien / Common Law | Leave a comment

Protected: M1S-30, Mann Private Dictionary–(5$) Documents that reference specific word by “*” to use this site as the definitions relied upon.

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Definitions Used | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: M1S-39, US Courts of RIGHT are Courts at NO COST. Brief Cost $5

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Court, Court Fees | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: M1S-41, Common Law Court, Court of Record, ‘Article III (3), How to Convene’, (15$)

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Article 3 Court, Common Law, Common Law Jury, Trial by Jury v. Jury Trial | Enter your password to view comments.

Protected: Affidavit, Notary Mailing Presentment, pass-protected

This post is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Posted in Notary | Enter your password to view comments.

Hansen, NOT FOR HIRE Plate.

Plate, Van, Master

They follow me but never stop me.

I think they are starting to learn why it has been long past called the freeway, right of way, and the open road.

Posted in Right To Travel, Automobil v. Motor-Vehicle | Leave a comment

Grand Jury Subpoena, an Invite, or Order? Hansen Challenged

Grand Jury Subpoena, an Invite, or Order? Hansen Challenged

See attached documents: I received a subpoina to appear in Florida, I challenged the request as to be an order supported by written law or just a request.

Apparently they want to see if I filed documents under an alias name.

Now I live in Nebraska, and besides why would I want to volunteer anything to the Grand Jury.  I suspect the 5th Amendment applies.

I’ll post if they decide to press a demand by court order.  It has been a weeks now and no swat team thus far.

1.6 Hansen Response to Subpoena  < was served with Affidavit of Sovereign Authority.

Hansen Paul John GJ Subpoena HANDWRITING SAMPLE FINGERPRINTS (19424) 8-19-14 W ATTACHMENT (3)

Below are Emails between Gand Jury Employees and Hansen:

Travel to Pensacola, FL, for Grand Jury appearance on August 19, 2014
Inbox
x

Busbee, Gretchen (USAFLN) Gretchen.Busbee@usdoj.gov via hotmail.com
Aug 12

to pauljjhansen
August 12, 2014

Good afternoon Mr. Hansen -

Per my previous voicemail messages left on Monday, August 11th and today, Tuesday, August 12th, I have been informed that you were served with federal grand jury subpoena number 19424 to appear at the U.S. District Courthouse on August 19, 2014, at 9:00am in Pensacola, Florida. The instructions to the grand jury subpoena instructed you to contact me within 48 hours of being served so that prepaid flight and lodging accommodations could be made for you. Please contact me immediately so that those travel arrangements can be made at no cost to you. I can be reached via this email, my direct dial at 850-444-4069 or my cell phone number at 850-554-5991.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Gretchen P. Busbee
Victim Witness Specialist
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Northern District of Florida
21 E. Garden Street, Suite 400
Pensacola, FL 32502
Tel: 850-444-4000
Busbee, Gretchen (USAFLN) Gretchen.Busbee@usdoj.gov via hotmail.com
Aug 13

to pauljjhansen, pauljjhansen
Mr. Hansen

Below is the original email that was sent yesterday afternoon. Per your text message I am sending it again since you prefer to communicate via email. I need the following information in order to make your travel arrangements into Pensacola:

Full name as reflected on photo id (including any middle name or any suffix)

Airport
Seat preference
DOB

Thank you and please let me know if you have any questions.
Paul Hansen <pauljjjjhansen@gmail.com>
Attachments Aug 13

to Gretchen
See attached.
In no way am I refusing any duty associated with applicable law noticed upon me.
Ink signed were sent to the listed recipients.
No response has yet beed received.

2 Attachments

Preview attachment 1.6 Hansen Response to Subpoena.docx
Word
1.6 Hansen Response to Subpoena.docx
Preview attachment Affidavit, Notary Mailing, Presentment, FL IRS, Subpoena.docx
Word
Affidavit, Notary Mailing, Presentment, FL IRS, Subpoena.docx

Eggers, Tiffany (USAFLN) <Tiffany.Eggers@usdoj.gov>
Attachments Aug 14

to me, Gretchen
Mr. Hansen,

As you know, Victim Witness Specialist Gretchen Busbee has left you two voicemails and communicated directly with you via email as shown below. Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum # 19424 was served upon you requiring you to appear before the Grand Jury on Tuesday, August 19, 2014 at 9:00 am. (Another copy of the subpoena is attached hereto for you.) It is imperative that you immediately communicate with Ms. Busbee directly so she can make your travel arrangements. Your failure to communicate with Ms. Busbee will prevent her from being able to make the necessary travel for you. However, please understand that your failure to communicate with Ms. Busbee will not relieve you of the requirement that you appear and comply with the subpoena. Therefore, please do not wait any longer and contact Ms. Busbee as she has previously requested.

Thank you and good day,

Tiffany H. Eggers
Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Attorney’s Office, NDFL
21 E. Garden Street, Ste. 400
Pensacola, Florida 32502
850-444-4000 p
850-434-9050 f

Please be advised that all emails sent to this address are archived and retained by the
United States Department of Justice.

From: Busbee, Gretchen (USAFLN)
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 10:48 AM
To: Eggers, Tiffany (USAFLN)
Subject: Fwd: Travel to Pensacola, FL, for Grand Jury appearance on August 19, 2014

Begin forwarded message:

From: Paul Hansen <pauljjjjhansen@gmail.com>
Date: August 13, 2014 at 10:43:12 AM CDT
To: “Busbee, Gretchen (USAFLN)” <Gretchen.Busbee@usdoj.gov>
Subject: Re: Travel to Pensacola, FL, for Grand Jury appearance on August 19, 2014
Attachments area
Preview attachment Hansen Paul John GJ Subpoena HANDWRITING SAMPLE FINGERPRINTS (19424) 8-19-14 W ATTACHMENT (3).pdf
PDF
Hansen Paul John GJ Subpoena HANDWRITING SAMPLE FINGERPRINTS (19424) 8-19-14 W ATTACHMENT (3).pdf

Paul Hansen <pauljjjjhansen@gmail.com>
Aug 14

to Tiffany, Gretchen
I have requested, in honor, the written law that the court clerk relies upon to impose the subject duty upon me to appear. Is this a communication that you have dishonored my request.
Eggers, Tiffany (USAFLN)
Aug 14

to me, Gretchen
Mr. Hansen,

You have been lawfully served with the below identified subpoena requiring your appearance. If you desire legal advice concerning the laws in which the subpoena are based, I suggest you obtain legal counsel.

Tiffany H. Eggers
Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Attorney’s Office, NDFL
21 E. Garden Street, Ste. 400
Pensacola, Florida 32502
850-444-4000 p
850-434-9050 f

Please be advised that all emails sent to this address are archived and retained by the
United States Department of Justice.

From: Paul Hansen [mailto:pauljjjjhansen@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 1:34 PM
To: Eggers, Tiffany (USAFLN)
Cc: Busbee, Gretchen (USAFLN)
Paul Hansen <pauljjjjhansen@gmail.com>
Aug 14

to Tiffany
No notice of written law to appear will result in no act of consent to appear.

>>>>

usernotice@google.com
9-8-2014

to Paul John Hansen
Dear Google Voice user 402-957-2853,

Google has received legal process issued by the Florida U.S. Attorney’s Office compelling the release of information related to your Google account. The agency reference number or case number on the legal process is 19568. Contact information for the agency is as follows:

(850) 444-4000

Unless we receive a copy of an objection filed with a court of competent jurisdiction, Google may provide responsive documents pursuant to applicable law, such as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. See 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.

For more information about how Google handles legal process, view our transparency report at http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/userdatarequests/legalprocess/.

Google is not in a position to provide you with legal advice or discuss the substance of the legal process. A copy of the legal process will be provided upon request. If you have other questions regarding this matter, we encourage you to contact an attorney. If you do not have an attorney, the Electronic Frontier Foundation may be able to provide assistance or recommend an attorney. More information can be found here: https://www.eff.org/pages/legal-assistance.

Please reply to this email and/or include the case identification number located in the subject line in any further communications regarding this matter.

Regards,
Google Legal Investigations Support

>>>>

Paul’s 1st Reply:          9-8-2014

TO: Attention Legal Department

“Section 2701 of Title 18 makes it an offense to either (a) intentionally access, without authorization, a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided; or (b) intentionally exceed the authorization of such facility; and as a result of this conduct, obtain, alter or prevent authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such a system.”

I see no association with turning my google account information over to anyone in the written law that you sited as Electronic Communications Privacy Act. See 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.
Please provide me with the exact portion of Title 18 USC that you rely upon to give my google account activity to anyone without a court order, judgment, or warrant from a court of competent jurisdiction. Provide me with the court order that you are exercising any legal duty as associated with my account.  
Please email me your response.

>>>>

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System. Counsel time and a vast array of briefs, motions, case law, legal challenges, etc.

Posted in Subpoena | Leave a comment

MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR IMPROPER GRAND JURY PROCEDURES

M1S-37 MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT FOR IMPROPER GRAND JURY PROCEDURES ($2.50)

This motion is used when discovery shows that, when no evidence, insufficient evidence. or withheld evidence, is part of the Grand Jury proceeding that the case can be dismissed as a matter of law.

They say that a ham sandwich can be indicted in a US Grand Jury, which is true, unless you place the right law before the judge and remove his discretion.

Innocent people have almost no chance of winning a US processed IRS criminal case. The prosecutor frame you in the Grand Jury process, the judge does everything possible so the jury can not see the true law, and the jury votes guilty because they fear retaliation if the IRS ever found out that you voted against them.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System. Counsel time and a vast array of briefs, motions, case law, legal challenges, etc.

Posted in Grand Jury Confirmation / Proof, Indictment Dismissal | Leave a comment