Social Security Number / Association

((This Looks good, but I, Paul Hansen, have not reviewed thoroughly.)

About the presumptions created by using the ssn (Social Security Number / Association) this is what I have found in the USC.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀApplication for ssn

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀOnly U.S. citizens and “lawful permanent residents” (aliens),਍ഀ both of whom have in common a legal domicile within the United States (federal਍ഀ terr.) can lawfully apply for a SSN and card (20 cfr਍ഀ 422.104).

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀThe regulation is found in title 20 of the CFR and the਍ഀ name of the title is “Employee’s Benefits”, for those who join the SS program਍ഀ agree to “act” as federal “employees” from that point forward.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀSSA section 1101, contains਍ഀ definitions of key terms used on the SS website indicating that a statutory਍ഀ U.S. citizen as used in the Act, means a person born in the District of਍ഀ Columbia or a federal terr. Or possession and domiciled there.  The definition of the term does not include਍ഀ the states of the Union and, therefore, must be excluded.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀPersons domiciled in states of the Union on other than਍ഀ federal terr. Are NOT eligible for SS because the S. Ct has indicated that਍ഀ Congress has NO LEGISLATIVE JURISDICTION within states of the Union (Carter v.਍ഀ Carter Coal Co, 1936)

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀA person born within and domiciled within states of਍ഀ the Union is classified as a “national” but not a “citizen” under federal਍ഀ law.  He is NOT a “U.S. citizen” under 8਍ഀ USC 1401.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀBecause people born in and domiciled within states of਍ഀ the Union are neither “US citizens” under 8 usc 1401਍ഀ nor “lawful permanent residents”, which are “aliens”, then they do not qualify਍ഀ for the SS program.  If they sign up,਍ഀ then they must commit perjury on the SS-5 form by indicating they are U.S.਍ഀ citizens.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀThe reason the U.S. gov is਍ഀ willing to “look the other way” by accepting unqualified applicants from states਍ഀ of the Union is because SS is the main਍ഀ method by which the IRS manufactures “taxpayers”, which are persons subject to਍ഀ federal jurisdiction and the IRS subtitle A.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀOffering of SS to people in states of the Union is an਍ഀ enlargement of federal powers beyond what the Constitution authorizes over਍ഀ citizens of the states who would otherwise be “foreign” and outside of the਍ഀ jurisdiction of the fed.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀSCOTUS said that the states CANNOT consent to such an਍ഀ enlargement of fed powers or the breakdown of the Separation of Powers that it਍ഀ causes.  If the State gov਍ഀ cannot do it then neither can the sovereign people in਍ഀ the states without violating the Constitution and destroying the protection਍ഀ provided by the (presumed) Separation of Powers.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀAny attempt to compel a person domiciled within a਍ഀ state of the Union on other than federal terr. and protected by the Bill of਍ഀ Rights (Articles of Con), to sign up for Social Security or to have or to use a਍ഀ SS number against their will and without their consent, and in violation of the਍ഀ Separation of Powers Doctrine within the Constitution therefore constitutes:

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

    ਍ഀ

  1. Conspiracy਍ഀ Against rights in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment and 18 USC 241.
  2. ਍ഀ

  3. 2.਍ഀ Violation of 42 usc 408
  4. ਍ഀ

  5. Violation਍ഀ of the Fourth Amendment right to privacy – since the information will be਍ഀ used to track me and hunt me like an animal.
  6. ਍ഀ

  7. An਍ഀ offense to my religious beliefs in violation of the first Amendment
  8. ਍ഀ

  9. Compelling਍ഀ me to comply with a law that I am not subject to.
  10. ਍ഀ

  11. Enticement਍ഀ into federal and state tax slavery in violation of the Thirteenth਍ഀ Amendment, 42 usc 1994 and 18 usc 1581 and 18 usc 1589.
  12. ਍ഀ

  13. Compelled਍ഀ association in violation of the First Amendment, whereby I am being਍ഀ compelled to maintain a domicile within federal jurisdiction and be਍ഀ subject to federal law, even though I otherwise would not be.
  14. ਍ഀ

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀNot to mention violation of rights of free inhabitant਍ഀ non-citizens.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀWhat are the legal consequences of participating in਍ഀ SS?

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀLegal status changes as follows:

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

    ਍ഀ

  1. Signing਍ഀ up for SS makes one into a “Trustee”, agent and fiduciary of the US gov. under 26 usc 6903.  The US gov is਍ഀ a foreign corporation with respect to a state of the Union, but it becomes਍ഀ a “domestic” corporation when we are acting as an “employee” and agent.
  2. ਍ഀ

  3. The US gov is defined as a “federal corporation” in 28 usc 3002(15)(A):
  4. ਍ഀ

਍ഀ ਍ഀtitle 28 – Judiciary and Judicial Procedure

਍ഀ ਍ഀPart VI – Particular Proceedings

਍ഀ ਍ഀChapter 176 – Federal Debt Collection Procedure

਍ഀ ਍ഀSubchapter A – Definitions and General provisions

਍ഀ ਍ഀSec. 3002 Definitions

਍ഀ ਍ഀ(15) “United States” means –

਍ഀ ਍ഀ(A) a Federal corporation;

਍ഀ ਍ഀ(B) an agency, department,਍ഀ commission, board, or other entity of the US; or

਍ഀ ਍ഀ(C) an instrumentality of the਍ഀ United States.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ3.  The Trust਍ഀ you are acting as a Trustee for is an “employee” of the United States gov within the meaning of the IRC under 26 cfr 31.3401©-1.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ4.  You, when਍ഀ acting as a Trustee, are an “officer or employee” of a federal corporation਍ഀ called the “United States”.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

    ਍ഀ

  1. The legal਍ഀ “domicile” of the Trust you are acting on behalf of is the “District of਍ഀ Columbia.”
  2. ਍ഀ

  3. The SS਍ഀ number is the “trustee License Number”. ਍ഀ Whenever you write your name anywhere on a piece of paper, and਍ഀ especially in conjunction with your all caps name, such as “JOHN SMITH”,਍ഀ you are indicating that you are acting in a Trustee capacity.  The only way to remove such a਍ഀ presumption is to black out the number or not put it on the form and then਍ഀ to correct whoever sent you the form or notice to clarify that you are not਍ഀ acting as a Trustee or government employee, but as a natural person.
  4. ਍ഀ

  5. As an਍ഀ “officer or employee of a corporation”, you are the proper subject of the਍ഀ penalty and criminal provisions of the IRC under:
  6. ਍ഀ

਍ഀ ਍ഀ26 usc਍ഀ 6671(b)

਍ഀ ਍ഀ26 usc਍ഀ 7343

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

    ਍ഀ

  1. The IRC਍ഀ becomes enforceable against you without the need for implementing਍ഀ regulations.  The Following statutes਍ഀ say that implementing regulations published in the Federal Register are਍ഀ not required in the case of federal employees or contractors:
  2. ਍ഀ

਍ഀ ਍ഀ5 usc਍ഀ 553(a) (2)

਍ഀ ਍ഀ44 usc਍ഀ 1505(a) (1)

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ9. ਍ഀ As a Trustee over the SS trust, you are a “public officer” engaged in a਍ഀ “trade or business” as defined in 26 usc 7701(a)਍ഀ (26).  Consequently, the earnings of the਍ഀ federal corporation you preside over as Trustee are taxable under the IRC.  You are exercising the function of a “public਍ഀ office” because you are exercising fiduciary duty over payments paid to the਍ഀ Fed.  You are in business with Uncle Sam਍ഀ and essentially become a “Kelly Girl”. ਍ഀ Income taxes are really just the “profits” of the Social Security trust਍ഀ created when you signed up for the program, which are “kicked back” to the਍ഀ mother corporation called the “United States.”

਍ഀ ਍ഀ10. ਍ഀ all items that you take deductions on under 26 usc਍ഀ 162, earned income credit under 26 usc 32, or a਍ഀ graduated rate of tax under 26 usc 1 become਍ഀ “effectively connected with a trade or business”, which is a codeword for਍ഀ saying that they are public property, because a “trade or business” is a਍ഀ “public office”.  This “trade or਍ഀ business” then becomes a means of earning you “revenue” or “profit” as a਍ഀ private individual, because it serves to reduce your tax liability as a Trustee਍ഀ filing 1040 returns for the SS Trust. ਍ഀ What the gov doesn’t tell you is that you਍ഀ can’t reduce a liability you wouldn’t have if you had just been smart enough not਍ഀ to sign up for SS.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ11. Therefore, whatever you take਍ഀ deduction on comes under the jurisdiction of the IRC, which is the vehicle by਍ഀ which the “public” controls the use of your formerly private property.  Every benefit has a string attached and in਍ഀ this case the string is that you as Trustee and all property you donate for਍ഀ temporary use by the Trust then comes under the਍ഀ jurisdiction of the IRC and SSA.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ12.  Your Trust employer is your new boss.  As your new boss, it does not need      territorial jurisdiction over you.  All it needs is “in rem”਍ഀ jurisdiction over the property you donated to the trust, which includes all਍ഀ your earnings.  All this property, while਍ഀ it is donated to a public use, becomes federal property under government਍ഀ management.  That is why the SSN is਍ഀ assigned to all accounts; to track government property, contracts, and਍ഀ employees.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ13.  Because the਍ഀ property already is government property while you are using it in connection਍ഀ with a “trade or business” (Trustee business) then you implicitly have already਍ഀ given the government permission to repossess that which always was theirs.  That is why they can issue a “Notice of Levy”਍ഀ without any judicial process and immediately and conveniently take custody of your਍ഀ bank accounts, personal property, and retirement funds: because they have the਍ഀ mark of the Beast, The slave Surveillance Number on them, which means you਍ഀ already gave them to your new benefactor and caretaker, the US gov.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ14.  The US Gov਍ഀ does not need territorial jurisdiction over you in order to drag you in federal਍ഀ court while you are acting as one of its Trustees and fiduciaries under 26 usc 6903.  any matter relating to federal contracts, whether they are਍ഀ Trust Contracts or federal employment contracts (with the “Trustee”), may ONLY਍ഀ be heard in a federal court.  It is a਍ഀ violation of the separation of powers doctrine for a state to hear a matter਍ഀ which might affect the federal government. ਍ഀ Federal Jurisdiction over Trustees is indeed “subject matter਍ഀ jurisdiction”, but it doesn’t derive primarily from the IRC.  Instead it derives form the agency and਍ഀ contract you maintain as a ‘Trustee”:

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀAmerican Jurisprudence, 2d

਍ഀ ਍ഀUnited States

਍ഀ ਍ഀ42 Interest on claim [77 Am Jury 2d UNITED STATES]

਍ഀ ਍ഀThe interest to be recovered as damages for the delayed਍ഀ payment of a contractual obligation to the United States is not controlled by਍ഀ state statute or local common law.  In਍ഀ the absence of an applicable federal statute, the federal courts must determine਍ഀ according to their own criteria the appropriate measure of damage.  State law may,  however, be adopted as the federal law਍ഀ of decision in some instances.

਍ഀ ਍ഀ 

਍ഀ ਍ഀ15.  The U. S. Supremes have always given wide਍ഀ latitude to manage its own “employees” which includes both its Social Security਍ഀ Trusts and the Trustees who are exercising agency over the Trust and its corpus਍ഀ or property.  You better bow down and਍ഀ worship you new boss: Uncle Sammy!

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

਍ഀ ਍ഀ

਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ ਍ഀ

About Paul John Hansen

Paul John Hansen -Foremost I love the Lord, His written Word, and the Elect Family of God. -My income is primarily derived from rental properties, legal counsel fees, selling PowerPoint presentations. -I am a serious student of territorial specific law, and constitutional limitations of the US and STATE Governments. -I have been in court over 250 times. -I have received numerous death threats that appear as to come from NEBRASKA STATE agents. -I have been arrested an estimated 8 times. Always bogus false warrants, misdemeanor charges. (Mostly Municipal Housing Codes, or related acts.) -I file no Federal Income Taxes (1040 Form) since the year 2001. (No filings in any form.) -I pay no State income taxes. -I do not pay STATE sales tax on major purchases. -I pay no COUNTY property taxes with out a judicial challenge. ( I believe I have discovered a filing for record process that takes my land off the tax roles. ) -I currently use no State drivers license, carry no vehicle liability insurance, do not register my automobiles. -I do not register to vote for any representatives. -I am a 'free inhabitant' pursuant to Article 4 of The Articles of Confederation. (Not a US citizen.) -I am subject to the Church jurisdiction, and a strong advocate of full ecclesiastical independence from the United States jurisdiction. -I believe in full support of the perpetual Union as found in the Articles of Confederation. -I believe that a free inhabitant has the lawful standing to choose to live independent of the constitutional corporate US governments, and its statutory courts in the vast majority of his daily life, and to be forced to do otherwise is slavery. -I believe that most all US written law is constitutional, but most all of that same law is misapplied upon jurisdictions where it has no force and effect of law and the bar association has perfected a system of keeping the people from knowing its true application. Order my 5$ presentation 'Free Inhabitant One A', for the truth in limited jurisdiction of all US written law.
This entry was posted in S.S. Number Disclosure Law. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Social Security Number / Association

  1. Lee Arthur II: family of Shine-Rice says:

    I truly appreciate the fact you are sharing your knowledge. I am currently in court regarding the right to travel. The local authorities in Idaho as well as in other states continue to drag people into court by writing citations. Our defense has been to file counterclaims against any and all agents and agencies including the STATE. Any information that have to settle these bills of attainder or contracts in court is greatly appreciated. Thank you and God bless.
    Respectfully,
    Lee
    Assistant Organizer
    Sons of the Republic-Idaho
    208.570.xxxx (direct)
    http://www.meetup.com/sons-of-the-republic-in-Idaho/members/11167993/
    >>Recently we have been winning every case, (No Registration, License, Insurance) if you want the info it is 25$. Paul Hansen

    http://imdb.com/name/nm0723491/

  2. Bob says:

    HI Paul,
    So how does one get rid of the SS#? I believe my parents not knowing what they were
    doing signed me up as a kid.
    Thanks,
    Bob

    • It is not your number so you can not get rid of it.
      It belongs to the USA / IRS.
      It can “NOT” be your number at any moment you chose, all one has to do is deny it as being yours, you must deny that it was never yours, and if ever asked you must state that you never “ever”, not even one time, have ever “used” that number.
      Why you can say that is because if you were not given the implications (full disclosure) of the number how could it ever be legally yours.
      So if you are in the witness chair this is the only words that MUST come out of your mouth; “that is not my number, I have never used the number, I do not agree to the use of the number.” If you say; “I use to use it now I do not”, that is an admission of free will use, you do not want to go there.
      Hypothetically if you call yourself the Son of Abraham Lincoln, it does not make it true, in this case you have never been bound to any number for even one second for it was never attached legally to you.
      Claiming/Using a SSN is claiming you are a willing subject (seeker of services) under the US government.
      Paul John Hansen

      P.S. Soon I’ll have sites up on how to get jobs, bank account, passports, drivers license, etc. with no SSN.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *