I talked with a Lawyer, he said that for 21 years he has been counsel (not attorney) for his clients, in County, State, and Federal Courts. He said the advantage to counsel is that you retain all your rights and opportunities for a full defense, especially personal jurisdiction. His bases is the following:
§1986. Action for neglect to prevent
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, >>which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefor, and may recover not exceeding $5,000 damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.
>>which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented;<< He presents to the court as not only his clients right to counsel but in addition his duty to protect and aid his client. He tells the court that he could be prosecuted under 42 USC 1986 for not aiding this person/client in their request for assistance.
He said at times they threaten him if he receives payment for his services that that is then practicing without a Bar License. He said that is bluff, the Bible says “A laborer is worthy of his wages.” Luke 10:7
Basically the law above says you must help, the law below says you can not be forced to help without just compensation.
Anti espionage Act of 1867. It currently exists as 42 U.S.C. §1994, which is the civil provision, and 18 U.S.C. §1581, Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. ((This act forbids anyone from making a duty upon someone, such as being counsel, and not allowing them just compensation. Occasionally the government will try and limit counsel by saying one can help but can not receive compensation.)) ((I, Paul Hansen was once arrested and charged with practicing law without a license in the State of Nebraska, they tried to get me to plea to a lesser charge, I refused and added that I can not wait to get this Officer that wrote that ticket to me in the witness stand, they begged again that I accept a lesser charge, I refused again, they dismissed the charges seconds before trial. I’ll I did was told a Omaha Cop that I was a Lawyer as in common law, and had not BAR license. Welcome to Omaha Nebraska.))
RE: ((Example written by one Lawyer as he had a public defender as counsel.))
Thank you for your willingness to provide me with the assistance of Counsel that I require. I intend to speak in court when I decide it necessary to give an answer, and at all times make decisions pertaining to myself and handle my affairs directly and not through agency! until and unless specifically and expressly so stated otherwise. I have NOT so stated otherwise, except for the specific limited needs expressed in this letter.
My defense, if any, will vary depending upon the jurisdiction of law that the prosecution invokes accordingly, due to the form of the following possible jurisdictions claimed: If Admiralty and Maritime, Equity, or at Common Law is its civil, criminal, or civil with criminal penalties including the specific statute, subsection, part and clause being applied to me.
1. I direct you to ensure the prosecution verbalize on the record to the court and the court verbalize to me which jurisdiction above is so aimed and have the prosecution provide the authority at law to support it.
2. I will need a Bill of Particulars from the Plaintiff/Prosecutor. I herein direct you to obtain this from the prosecution. The Bill shall contain, answer to all information requested in my Foreign Plea in Abatement/Counter Forfeiture on file in this cause.
3. I will need a complete copy of all information, communication and full Discovery with. verification from the prosecution of what that Discovery contains. I herein direct you to obtain all the items listed as well as any you know will benefit me.
a. A certified copy of the tape of the voice transmissions between the arresting officer and his dispatch officer/dispatcher, also between the arresting officer and his supervisor concerning the incident leading to and at the time of arrest i.e. inquiry at stop and executed citations
b. The arresting officer’s incident report, notes and memos.
c. A copy of all reports and evidence acquired, including written affidavits by all the officers at the scene, including all the involved agencies whether generated and/or gathered by way of computer, hand written requests an/or other data transfer methods, pertaining to all records searches.
d. A manual to interpret all coded/abbreviated reports provided.
e. A complete list of at! witnesses the prosecution intends to call at any stage of any proceeding.
f. A complete list of all evidence the prosecution plans to use against me at any stage of any proceeding.
g. A complete list of all charges the prosecution intends to charge the accused at any stage of any proceeding.
4. I will need a complete copy of the Docket (index of what has been filed with the Court). Everything is to be sent directly to me in a timely fashion so that 1 may view and scrutinize ii myself. No decisions are to be made or action taken on my behalf without my direct approval.
Your participation implies a Loyalty of Counsel, your loyalties in this matter are wholly towards me and that you have no conflicting loyalties to anyone else but me. I forbid you to communicate with any members of the Plaintiff or officers of the Court about this case without my direct instruction and/or supervision.
If you are either unable or unwilling to provide me with assistance in this case, as outlined above, please notify the Court immediately so that competent, active, zealous, and effective assistance of Counsel can be assigned in a timely manner.
cc; Court Records Clerk
Plaintiff / Prosecutor
Luis Ewing uses the below to be counsel for his clients:
AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . . WITHOUT ADMISSION. . . by the WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 38.38.256, 5 U.S.C. 500 (b), RCW 26.25.010, RCW 26.21.005 (19)(a) and RCW 26.21A.005 (21)(a), RCW 26.26.011 (19), RCW 26.27.021 (16), RCW 26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. 1154, 18 U.S.C 1161, 18 U.S.C. 2265, 25 U.S.C. 1301, 25 U.S.C. 1903 (4), 25 U.S.C. 1903 (8), 25 U.S.C. 1911 (a)(b)(c), 25 U.S.C. 1901 -1963 (ICW), 25 U.S.C. 3631, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 44 Fed. Reg. 67584 to 67595 (1979), RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), GR 24 (b)(8), Sections 3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881. See also CR 82.5 (a) & RCW 13.34.240.