((I personally suspect that one letter to the jury foreman would be sufficient, or the party that is summoning you.))
>>
The below is an Example of a client noticing state that he did not ellect to become a US citize, and was taken of jury call.
3-22-2018 – Paul: Brevard County, FL, sent me a Summons for Jury duty. I replied that I was not a United States citizen and was not registered to vote. They replied via email below and stated I was not qualified for this summons. Also these emails in Florida with the state or county are part of the public record according to their statutes. John Schiavone
>>>
Letter to Clerk of the United States District Court at
_________________________
Dear Court Clerk:
I have obtained the federal court research of Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, who received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1971 and has been a member of the Bar of California since June 2, 1972. In addition to his legal education and experience, he has a bachelor’s degree in government.
I want to verify certain facts about the status of the United States District Court,
I have been told that I can obtain a copy of the Jury Service and Selection Plan approved by the appeals court. I have been unable to obtain from the web site of this court: statements of the status of the court and a description of geographical boundaries of the judicial district. I was told that if I could not obtain these documents off the Internet was unable to obtain those documents from the Internet, they might be available from the Office of the Clerk of the Court.
I am making a request of the following documents because they were not available from the court’s web site:
1. Document identifying Article of Constitution under which court was established.
2. Document describing territory that comprises court’s judicial district.
3. Copy of the Jury Service and Selection Plan.
He has stated in the opinion letter that he prepared for me that the statute law that established that court does not refer to Article III of the United States Constitution and, therefore, the court cannot be ordained and established under Article III. I must obtain a statement from you, the clerk of the court, as to what article of the United States Constitution was used to establish the court.
His conclusion, based on the statute law which was provided to me along with his opinion letter, is that the court was created pursuant to Article I or IV of the United States Constitution and, therefore, the court is limited to territorial jurisdiction consisting of the lands and improvements over which the government of the United States has exclusive jurisdiction.
The purpose of this letter is to alert you to the fact that the United States District Court, ________________________________(or here insert the name of the court that has no Article III judicial power. If you disagree with his conclusion that the United States District Court, ______________________is a territorial court, I will be happy to send you, upon your request, the underlying material upon which he bases that conclusion and his analysis. All you have to do is disagree with Doctor Rivera’s conclusion that the United States District Court, _______________________is a territorial court and I will send you copies of the statute law upon which he relied to make his conclusion.
Very truly yours,
_______________
****************************
Letter To The
Foreman of the Grand Jury
I retained Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, who received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1971 and has been a member of the Bar of California since June 2, 1972, to prepare an opinion letter regarding the status of the United States District Court, District of____________. In addition to his legal education and experience, he has a bachelor’s degree in government.
He stated in the opinion letter that he prepared for me that statute law including Title 28 U.S.C. that established that court does not refer to Article III of the United States Constitution and, therefore, the court cannot be ordained and established under Article III. I must obtain a statement from you, the clerk of the court, as to what article of the United States Constitution was used to establish the court.
Doctor Rivera told me, that to confirm his findings, I should obtain from the web site of the above court: statements of the status of the court and a description of geographical boundaries of the judicial district. He also told me to obtain a copy of the Jury Service and Selection Plan approved by the appeals court. He told me that if I was unable to obtain those documents from the Internet, they might be available from the Office of the Clerk of the Court.
I am making a request of the following documents from you as foreman of the grand jury of this court, because after repeated unsuccessful attempts to obtain the documents from the clerk of the court and they were not available from the court’s web site.
1. Document identifying the Article of the Constitution under which the court was established.
2. Document describing territory that comprises court’s judicial district.
3. Copy of the Jury Service and Selection Plan.
He has stated in the opinion letter that he prepared for me that the statute law that established that court does not refer to Article III of the United States Constitution and, therefore, the court cannot possibly be ordained and established under Article III. I must obtain a statement from you, the clerk of the court, as to what article of the United States Constitution was used to establish the court.
His conclusion based on the statute law which was provided to me along with his opinion letter is that the court was created pursuant to Article I of the United States Constitution and, therefore, the court is limited to territorial jurisdiction consisting of the lands and improvements over which the government of the United States has exclusive jurisdiction.
The purpose of this letter is to alert you to the fact that the United States District Court of Arizona (or here insert the name of the court that has no Article III judicial power. If you disagree with his conclusion that the United States District Court, _____________is a territorial court, I will be happy to send you the underlying material upon which he bases that conclusion and his analysis. All you have to do is disagree with Doctor Rivera’s conclusion that the United States District Court, _____________________________is a territorial court and I will send you copies of the statute law upon which he relied to make his conclusion.
*****************************
Letter to Congressman
The Honorable (full name)
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Dear Mr.
The United States District Court, _____________________________is located within your congressional district. My attorney told me to obtain a written statement from your office as to the article of the United States Constitution that was used to create the court.
I retained Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, who received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1971 and has been a member of the Bar of California since June 2, 1972, to prepare an opinion letter regarding the status of the United States District Court, __________________________________________.
His conclusion, based on the statute law which was provided to me along with his opinion letter is that the court was created pursuant to Article I of the United States Constitution and, therefore, the court is limited to territorial jurisdiction consisting of the lands and improvements over which the government of the United States has exclusive jurisdiction.
The purpose of this letter is to alert you to the fact that the United States District Court _____________________________has no Article III judicial power. If you disagree with his conclusion, that the United States District Court, __________________is a territorial court, I will be happy to send you the underlying material upon which he bases that conclusion and his analysis. All you have to do is disagree with Doctor Rivera’s conclusion that the United States District Court, ____________________________________is a territorial court and I will send you copies of the statute law upon which he relied to make his conclusion.
Very truly yours,
********************************
Letter to United States Senator
The Honorable (full name)
United States Senate
Washington, D.C.
Dear Mr.
The United States District Court, __________________________ is located within the exterior boundaries of (State). My attorney told me to obtain a written statement from your office as to what article of the United States Constitution was used to create the court. Will you please respond in writing to my request?
I retained Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, who received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1971 and who has been a member of the Bar of California since June 2, 1972, to prepare an opinion letter regarding the status of the United States District Court, ___________________________________.
His conclusion, based on the statute law which was provided to me along with his opinion letter, is that the court was created pursuant to Article I of the United States Constitution and, therefore, the court is limited to territorial jurisdiction consisting of the lands and improvements over which the government of the United States has exclusive jurisdiction.
The purpose of this letter is to alert you to the fact that the United States District Court, ________________________has no Article III judicial power. If you disagree with his conclusion that the United States District Court, _____________________is a territorial court, I will be happy to send you the underlying material upon which he bases that conclusion and his analysis. All you have to do is disagree with Doctor Rivera’s conclusion that the United States District Court, ___________________________is a territorial court and I will send you copies of the statute law upon which he relied to make his conclusion.
Very truly yours,
*******************************
Letter to United States Attorney
The Honorable (full name)
United States Attorney
The United States District Court,
Middle District of ___________
Dear Mr.
The United States District Court, Middle District of ____________is located within the exterior boundaries of Florida. My attorney told me to obtain a written statement from your office as to what article of the United States Constitution was used to create the court. Will you please respond in writing to my request?
I retained Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera, who received a Juris Doctor degree from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1971 and who has been a member of the Bar of California since June 2, 1972, to prepare an opinion letter regarding the status of the United States District Court, Arizona.
His conclusion, based on the statute law which was provided to me along with his opinion letter, is that the court was created pursuant to Article I of the United States Constitution and, therefore, the court is limited to territorial jurisdiction consisting of the lands and improvements over which the government of the United States has exclusive jurisdiction.
The purpose of this letter is to alert you to the fact that the United States District Court, ____________________ has no Article III judicial power. If you disagree with his conclusion that the United States District Court, Middle District of ________________ Division is a territorial court, I will be happy to send you the underlying material upon which he bases that conclusion and his analysis. All you have to do is disagree with Doctor Rivera’s conclusion that the United States District Court, _________________ is a territorial court and I will send you copies of the statute law upon which he relied to make his conclusion.
Very truly yours,
Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.
