Common Law, How to Implement this Court of Record.

Posted on May 4, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

“Custom and usage since time immemorial” is generally what is behind the definition of common law. There is no singular source of the common law as one would expect with statutes made by a legislature.

Having said that, consider also that law follows physical power.

Let’s pretend that you reset your brain almost to zero–you have no knowledge but your natural knowledge of good and evil, your natural intelligence, and a language with which to communicate with others. You are in your sovereign capacity, accountable to no higher authority, but acknowledging the sovereignty of others and that you may not diminish the sovereignty of others. You are at peace.

Along comes another being like you who causes you pain for which you want fair compensation.

At this point you have a choice: you can do immediate battle, or you can round up other like beings (we suggest 12 of them, a jury) and ask them to join you in battle. If you can get all of them to agree that you have a just cause, then it would be you and them against the accused (you+them=13 against 1).

They, not having been present at the time of the crime, being fair minded, demand that you justify your request (provide the rule and prove your facts).

You make your presentation, and the accused makes his counter-presentation. After the presentations (the trial) the jury retires to cogitate over two questions.

The first question: Is the rule valid? If, in the opinion of the jury your rule is not valid (jury nullification), then they will refuse to join you (a not-guilty verdict). But, if they, in their independent sovereign judgment agree with your rule, then they move on to the second question.

The second question: Did the actions of the accused violate the rule. If, in the opinion of the jury he did not, then they will refuse to join you (a not-guilty verdict). But, if they, in their independent sovereign judgment agree that your rule was violated, then they will join you (a guilty verdict).

If the jury’s decision is split, the issue remains unresolved, and a new trial may be needed with a new jury.

If the jury’s decision is unanimous, whether “guilty” or “not guilty”, the question is decided, and you now have 13 vs. 1. Depending on the verdict, the “1” would be either the accuser or the accused.

Whoever lost the case would be foolish to do physical battle against 13 opponents. Thus, through this process, we bring peace to the realm.

An accuser always has jurisdiction to accuse. The accused always has jurisdiction to defend. And, either one may grant jurisdiction to a jury to intervene.

That is the bare essence of the common law.

Anything more than that is an attempt to “improve” the process. However, so-called “improvements” often are imperfect.

Although there is no singular authoritative source of common law, much has been written over the past thousand years. Many have come to respect the thoughts and opinions of those who preceded them. Having respect does not mean to quit thinking. Education is the process of learning about prior conclusions. Those conclusions are a valuable guide to use to arrive at our own conclusions.

In true common law, there are no obligatory rules or precedents. A common law court (a court of record) has unlimited jurisdiction and is independent of government. All external factors are, at best, advisory, not obligatory.

The founding fathers understood all that. At his 1801 inaugural Thomas Jefferson said, “Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.” And he wrote, “I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves: and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion.” [Letter, September 28, 1820.]

The self-correcting temporary imperfections of common law were preferable to the entrenched imperfections of legislated written laws. That is why they chose the common law as the law superior to statutes and all other forms law. They expressed that choice through the Constitution‘s 7th Amendment which essentially says that no court may second-guess (review) a decision of a jury.

Also, notice that, although the common law is outside of the Constitution, the Constitution authorizes the USA to support the common law with its judicial power. See Article III, Section 2-1.

A statutory or constitutional court (whether it be an appellate or supreme court) may not second guess the judgment of a common law court of record. The Supreme Court of the USA acknowledges the common law as supreme:  The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final, is as conclusive on all the world as the judgment of this court would be. It is as conclusive on this court as it is on other courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact, by deciding it.” Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet., at 202-203. [cited by SCHNECKLOTH v. BUSTAMONTE, 412 U.S. 218, 255 (1973)]

 

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The purpose of this provision is to preserve the right to a jury trial as it existed at common law and under statutes in force when the Nebraska Constitution was adopted in 1875. The essential character of a cause of action and the remedy or relief it seeks as shown by the allegations of the petition determine whether a particular action is one at law to be tried to a jury or in equity to be tried to a court. State ex rel. Cherry v. Burns, 258 Neb. 216, 602 N.W.2d 477 (1999).

>>

The right of trial by jury is a right not extended by the Constitution but one preserved. In an equity case the court may, but is not bound to, give a jury trial. Omaha Fire Insurance Co. v. Thompson, 50 Neb. 580, 70 N.W. 30 (1897).

>>

An action upon a contract for the payment of money only, unencumbered by any collateral agreements, contracts or securities whatever, is a legal action and the issue of fact is triable to a jury. Kuhl v. Pierce County, 44 Neb. 584, 62 N.W. 1066 (1895).

>>

Where a petition states a cause of action for equitable relief and prays for equitable relief, a jury cannot be demanded as a matter of right for the trial of any issue arising in the case. Sharmer v. McIntosh and Johnson, 43 Neb. 509, 61 N.W. 727 (1895).

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

Rivera, Common Law:

 

>>

Section 61 set rules for establishing the Grand Jury. It states: Since we have granted all these things for God, for the better ordering of our kingdom, and to allay the discord that has arisen between us and our barons (people), and since we desire that they shall be enjoyed in their entirety, with lasting strength, forever, we give and grant to the barons the following security: The barons shall elect twenty-five of their number to keep, and cause to be observed with all their might, the peace and liberties granted and confirmed to them by this charter. If we, our chief justice, our officials, or any of our servants offend in any respect against any man, or transgress any of the articles of the peace or of this security, and the offense is made known to four of the said twenty-five barons, they shall come to us.”

>>

Though the common law has been the subject of many books it is ultimately found written on every human heart.  This is where every common law juror finds the law to be applied to the case.

It may be politically incorrect, but it is true that only God can make the laws for a free people.

Ø      The United States Government personnel investigating the Governor know they must use “State of Illinois” grand jurors, but they  will try to use “state of Illinois” grand jurors to indict the governor.

Ø      The Common Law Jury members (acting as judges of the Law) were sworn to “Do equal law, and execution of Right, to all the King’s subjects, rich and poor, without having regard to any person”

In Federalist Papers #48, Alexander Hamilton wrote in part, “No legislative act contrary to the Constitution can be valid.” “The Constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by judges as a fundamental law.”

The Sheriff is also a servant of the People, elected and paid by and for Them; upon taking office he takes an oath to uphold the Constitution (the People’s Law) and keep the peace.

The purpose of the English common law is to, also, govern behavior by making rules that are enforced by the people themselves sitting in grand and petit juries.  Questions of a common law marriage have to be determined by common law jurors, when the married partners can’t resolve them without resort to legal process.

Traditionally, the sheriff facilitated the operation of the common law by assembling the jurors for a common law trial.  Today, sheriffs operate the county jail and perform written law enforcement.   The people are not taught the law or its history, so they are doomed to repeat all the mistakes.  I am trying to teach them so they can qualify as common law jurors.

Ø      Common law marriage is not subject to licensing, recordation or registration.

Ø      The authority for the law comes from property rights not sovereignty.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

Common Law Court:

The failure or refusal of the President of the United States of America and all the members of Congress to subscribe a written oath “to support this Constitution” makes it impossible to ordain and establish an Article III judiciary.  The States can, however, implement Article IV and Article V, if limited to the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

>>>

Proposed Rules:

1. Never serve summons, or attempt to collect a judgment on USA owned land without first getting written permission. Jurisdiction

(USA does this if they know they are being watched.)

2. Independent servers, using digital devises to record the service, with notarized Affidavit of Service / Notice.

3. We can do most of it just exactly like the Federals do, but better.

4. Digitally record both video and voice of all proceedings/hearings and give them to the leaving party each day.   Have minimum of one back up digital recorder for safety.

5. Have a large visual digital recorder time display so that one can mark time so that reference can be easily posted by any one in the court room.

6. Have screen(s) that displays what exactly is being recorded for all to see.

7. Elect / Appoint our own general / local sheriff.

8. Put the hearing on the internet immediately after the days hearing so that many people can aid in the outcome of the hearings.

9. Provide video depositions to be entered into the record.

10. Have voice recognition software that will convert the speech into text.

11. Only have non-criminal hearings to begin with.

12. Jury selected according to the organic laws of Articles of Confederation 1777.

13. Jury of 12, or 6.  Defendant can demand 12, or Plaintiff can demand 12, but both must agree to convene 6.

14. Jury can ask questions during the trial.   If a majority of the jury decides that one juror has exhausted his question opportunity that juror is bard from asking question provided his questions have taken min. of 30 minutes thus far.

15. Only common English shall be allowed.

16. Cost can be imposed on losing party if jury decided the action was thrivelouse.

17. Court cost and Jury shall be paid by losing party.   Each juror is given the opportunity on the record to be compensated for his time.  ($ per day not per hour.)  Every attempt shall be made to hold the cost down so that everyone can have access to remedy.

18. Anyone can speak as council for another, not as evidentiary, but as opening and closing statements.

19. Anyone can quietly aid any party in the suit.

20. Certified copies are required unless waived by opposing party.

21. All communication between the Plaintiff and Defendant shall be by internet so that a record can be maintained.

22. An overseer shall be available in aiding pretrial discovery.

23. All discovery not answered shall be presented to the Jury and the Jury shall decide if the unanswered discovery is for just cause or as attempt to hide evidence, and therefore have option to hold the unanswered portions against the un-answering party.

24. Jurors shall communicate by email prior to trial only to the needs of electing the time for trial.  The Overseer, Defendant, and Plaintiff shall have opportunities to communicate to the jury by the/through the Overseer on this one issue of “setting trial date”.  No Plaintiff or Defendant shall converse with any juror at anytime from the onset of the initial summons until after the trial is complete.

25. A facilitator shall be appointed for the day of trial.  Duty is to provide fairness, equal access to the jury, to all parties.

26. Complaints are to be presented point for point.

27. Points in complaint shall be presented individually.  Defendant has the opportunity to challenge each individual point one at a time.

28. Jurisdiction must be clearly stated on the record.  The Court shall present on its website the various known jurisdictions that the court holds.

29. All exhibit documents shall be held by the Court for six months, unless asked for by the offering party.  Opposing party can contest and give cause for no release for issues of pending fraud for up to the six month term.

30. All offered exhibits can only be viewed by any party under video recorded surveillance.

31. No evidence surprise shall be allowed.

29. Filling fee shall be. $________.___.  No exceptions allowed.

Fee shall include:

a. Audio and Video recording cost.

b. Court docket filing fee.

c. Court room lease cost.

30. Option of several trials shall scheduled if possible to utilize a jury pool for the day.

31. Jury pool shall be voluntary.

32. Counter suits are aloud.

Please add to this list as needed, and email it to me, I’ll then put it on my website pauljjhansen@hotmail.com for all to see that day.

Our goal is to set a national standard, that others can freely adopt.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

 Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Common Law, Court | 1 Comment

Jurisdiction of all USA Courts, (Their Lands !)

Posted on April 29, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

What is a USA Court, any court that is associated with administration of a subdivision of the USA, or one of it’s entities. Essentially every court, tribunal, administrative hearing, that is acting between Canada and Mexico.

We have a government with very limited jurisdiction, but no one is told, not even the Attorneys.  Force them to prove, before you enter their court, this is your only remedy.    Look for common law remedy not a USA administrative, lying, deceiving, corrupt court remedy, whose main objective is to enrich there own interests ($).

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 1 > § 7

§ 7. Special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States defined

The term “special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States”, as used in this title, includes:

(1) The high seas, any other waters within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State, and any vessel belonging in whole or in part to the United States or any citizen thereof, or to any corporation created by or under the laws of the United States, or of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, when such vessel is within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States and out of the jurisdiction of any particular State.

(2) Any vessel registered, licensed, or enrolled under the laws of the United States, and being on a voyage upon the waters of any of the Great Lakes, or any of the waters connecting them, or upon the Saint Lawrence River where the same constitutes the International Boundary Line.

(3) Any lands reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise acquired by the United States by consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of a fort, magazine, arsenal, dockyard, or other needful building.

((( 3 above is essentially the same a Section 8 (line 17) – Powers of Congress of the USA Constitution 1787 –“ To exercise exclusive Legislation (law making-jurisdiction) in all Cases whatsoever, over such District…”)))

(((So all court orders of the USA and USA legislative acts only apply (have direct force and effect of law) to said exclusive lands.)))

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Jurisdiction / Territorial | Leave a comment

Bank must lend deposits, not credit.

Posted on April 28, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Below is case law that explains why Credit Card Companies always sell their debt to Attorneys for less than 20%.  They are buying credit extended debt.  If the Credit Company were to show up in court they could run the risk of being caught red handed in lending computer generated credit.  This is one primary reason for the inflated US dollar.

The Defendant, M & T BANK, has no right to lend credit as this is a violation of their corporate charter and violates Federal law, and is prohibited under the doctrine of ultra vires.

The United States Supreme Court and the lower courts have long recognized that the banks cannot loan credit.

“In the federal courts, it is well established that a national bank has not

power to lend its credit to another by becoming surety, endorser, or guarantor for

him.” Farmers and Miners Bank v. Bluefield Nat ‘l Bank, 11 F 2d 83, 271 U.S. 669.

“A national bank has no power to lend its credit to any person or corporation.”

. . . Bowen v. Needles Nat. Bank, 94 F 925 36 CCA 553, certiorari denied in 20 S.Ct 1024, 176 US 682, 44 LED 637.

“The doctrine of ultra vires is a most powerful weapon to keep private corporation within their legitimate spheres and to punish them for violations of their corporate charters, and it probably is not invoked too often .. .” Zinc Carbonate Co. v. First National Bank, 103 Wis 125, 79 NW 229.  American Express Co. v. Citizens State Bank, 194 NW 430.

“A bank may not lend its credit to another even though such a transaction turns

out to have been of benefit to the bank, and in support of this a list of cases

might be cited, which-would look like a catalog of ships.” [Emphasis added] Norton Grocery Co. v. Peoples Nat. Bank, 144 SE 505. 151 Va 195.

“It has been settled beyond controversy that a national bank, under federal

Law being limited in its powers and capacity, cannot lend its credit by guaranteeing

the debts of another. All such contracts entered into by its officers are ultra

vires . . .” Howard & Foster Co. v. Citizens Nat’l Bank of Union, 133 SC

202, 130 SE 759(1926).

“Neither, as included in its powers not incidental to them, is it a part of

a bank’s business to lend its credit. If a bank could lend its credit as well as

its money, it might, if it received compensation and was careful to put its name

only to solid paper, make a great deal more than any lawful interest on its money

would amount to. If not careful, the power would be the mother of panics, . . .

Indeed, lending credit is the exact opposite of lending money, which is the real

business of a bank, for while the latter creates a liability in favor of the bank,

the former gives rise to a liability of the bank to another. I Morse. Banks and

Banking 5th Ed. Sec 65; Magee, Banks and Banking, 3rd Ed. Sec 248.” American

Express Co. v. Citizens State Bank, 194 NW 429.

“It is not within those statutory powers for a national bank, even though solvent,

to lend its credit to another in any of the various ways in which that might be

done.” Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. L ‘Herrison, 33 F 2d 841, 842 (1929).

“There is no doubt but what the law is that a national bank cannot lend its credit or become an accommodation endorser.” National Bank of Commerce v. Atkinson, 55 E 471.

“A bank can lend its money, but not its credit.” First Nat’l Bank of Tallapoosa

v. Monroe. 135 Ga 614, 69 SE 1124, 32 LRA (NS) 550.

“.. . the bank is allowed to hold money upon personal security; but it must

be money that it loans, not its credit.” Seligman v. Charlottesville Nat. Bank,

3 Hughes 647, Fed Case No.12, 642, 1039.

“A loan may be defined as the delivery by one party to, and the receipt by

another party of, a sum of money upon an agreement, express or implied, to repay

the sum with or without interest.” Parsons v. Fox; 179 Ga 605, 176 SE 644. Also

see Kirkland v. Bailey, 155 SE 2d 701 and United States v. Neifert White Co., 247

Fed Supp 878, 879.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Bank / Promissory Note, Banking/Money Issues | 6 Comments

Eviction Package, $35.00 / DO IT YOURSELF

Posted on April 22, 2011 by Paul John Hansen
$35.00 package / do it yourself evictions-made easy.
Pay with easy to use PAYPAL.
EVICTION PACKAGE
NOTICE – 

 

a. Step by Step check off list. With written instructions Hansen uses to file his document.
b. Statute required-3 Day Notice for Non-payment of Rent.
c. Statute requiered-30 Day Notice to Vacate.
d. Court Petition / Complaint / Restitution / Eviction.
e. Addendum of instruction for Constable/Sheriff to said Petition.
f. Affidavit verifying Mailing Court Issued Summons with attached Summons.
g. Addendum of Instructions for Plaintiffs mailing obligations.
h. Affidavit, (w/Exhibits) for day of Court.
i.  Court Order for presentment.
j.  Writ of Restitution, and Praecipe.
k. Documentation of Vacate.
l.  NO Trespassing Notice.
m. NOTICE, Sheriff Services.
n.  Real stories of how Hansen failed in getting the eviction order.
o. What Hansen typically experiences in a court eviction hearing.
p. Odd events/mistakes that Hansen has experience in eviction hearings.
q. Nebraska Statutes on Evictions.
r. All above shall be in MS ‘WORD’ compatible.

NOTICE-Due to the changes that may take place the above forms can only be viewed as time relative as used by Hansen and may be statutorily change per ‘legislative’ enactment. For notification of such contact -“pauljjhansen@hotmail.com”, (click ‘CONTACT US’ above) and new info will be available per Hansen’s personal ongoing use in the courts.
>>>

I am having temporary difficulty with Paypal Payment, just email me for payment details.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Evictions / Made Easy / $35.00 | Leave a comment

Foreclosure Challenge info from Judge

Posted on April 21, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

RE:  Eminent Domain action and Foreclosure Challenge

Paul,

I’m a retired Florida District Judge.  I don’t do this stuff anymore and was simply interjecting some guidance.  The best I will do for you is point you…..however you must understand some basic principles first:

1] The republic of United States of America still exists.  It has been concealed in the closet by your elected officials and replaced with “United States, Inc.” and you and it are being controlled by corporate law, which is called Statutory Law.  If you are not a corporation, then these laws are not applicable.

2] US Currency is not backed by gold.  It is worthless paper and only has value as long as you believe it does.  The UCC describes it as a “Negotiable Debt Instrument.”  So—-how much does a “negotiable Debt” go for these days?

[I actually got a man off a criminal Theft charge in Oregon using that argument!]

3] If you search an early Legal Dictionary for the definition of a “Closing” you will discover that at a “Closing,” all matters concerning a parcel of land is finished or closed that day!  The concept of a Mortgage is a FRAUD and the promissory note you are asked to endorse is sold as quickly as you exit the Bank.  [The Mortgage payments you make are deposits because no Mortgage actually exists and no contract exists.  Examine the Law of Contracts so that you understand what constitutes a contract].

4] The fraudulent Mortgage Note is also sold and the Bank or their agent collects your payments and forwards them to the Bank that purchased your fraudulent Mortgage Note.

5] Every fraudulent Mortgage payment tendered is saved in a numbered account and not a named account.  If a fraudulent Mortgage is paid off, the purchaser Bank waits 90 days to prove that you are believed dead because no further activity has occurred and then mails a request to the IRS to close the savings account and keep the money on the grounds that the money has been abandoned].  By the way, the sitting Judge on these Foreclosures receives a percentage of the foreclosed property!  Sorry!

6] All Courts under United States, Inc, which includes all the State Courts are Tribunals and all the Judges are Administrators and not Judges, meaning that no real Courts exist!  [The concept of a Court is intended to be a last resort to resolve disputes and therefore you must develop your proof that you are right before you enter.  If you can avoid a Court, do so by all means because everything is stacked against you]!

7] Since they are Tribunals, you must agree to be sued and agree to the intervention of the Court to resolve the dispute!  Return a summons and a suit using this method. Print this boldly across it with your signature notarized.

“I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT AND I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS PROCEDURE.”

8] If you reside in a warrant less State like Florida, foreclosure can proceed without any knowledge of a Court.  This complicates the matter for you but you can stop the proceedings with a petition for INJUNCTIVE RELIEF but first set them up using a list of demands to them to show or produce the original contract and promissory note.

9] They cannot move forward or claim ownership without them!  I have a whole list of documents that you could demand to see in person and request certified copies of.  Their refusal sets them up for your Injunction.  All you want out of your injunction is a: “dismissal with prejudice.”]  Damages can come later so don’t complicate the process at this point!

10] The Homestead Act can be presented to them as well with a demand to discontinue their process based upon that law, which has never been repealed and then you can add it to the content of your Injunction.

>>

This is way too big for you to unravel alone!  The Judge receives a percentage of the foreclosure sale, so you’re not going to receive a square deal without threatening him [and] empty threats will always land you in Jail again!

You’re a living corporation and the property of the State government in which you were born!  When your mother registered you for a Birth Certificate, she gave you away to the State government.  You were assigned a corporate name, which appears on every document you possesss in all capital letters!  You had three months at age 18, to recind that agreement!

When you applied for a Social Security No. [or] if you ever applied for any government benefits, you consumated your corporate membership and accepted a new responsibility as Trustee of your corporation for the State!  Whenever you fail to comply with the five million corporate statutes in place, the Courts punish you!

You can thank all your elected Presidents and the Congress for enslaving you!  Instead of pointing our weapon’s at the Middle East, we should be pointing them at our federal and state government!  The Middle East is just a diversion while Congress draws the hangman’s rope tighter.  You’re dealing with the people who taught the Nazi’s about slavery and propaganda!  We even financed Adolph Hitler through the Rothschild Banking Empire.

You truly need the aid and assistance of a Private Attorney General.  Neither Ed nor I can teach you what you need to know in the short amount of time you have and I’m certainly not going to try!  This may sound cruel but you are not my child or my responsibility!

All lawyers are a part of the conspiracy against: WE THE PEOPLE!  See: 28 USC 3002, section 15a…….. All BAR judges and attorney/lawyer’s are members of a larger organization titled:  The National Lawyers Guild Communist Party.

They’re so large an organization and in charge of every -thing that they aren’t afraid to record it for everyone to read!

In addition you and/or your family can also file a Quit Claim Deed against the family farm under the State Homestead Act.

Sorry, but that’s all the advice I will give you…..and you are now on your own!

Dan

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Foreclosure | Leave a comment

Statutory Person / Corporate Person / Slave

Posted on April 21, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Statutory Person / Corporate Person

 

Paul,

I’m a retired Florida District Judge.  I don’t do this stuff anymore and was simply interjecting some guidance.  The best I will do for you is point you…..however you must understand some basic principles first:

 

1] The republic of United States of America still exists.  It has been concealed in the closet by your elected officials and replaced with “United States, Inc.” and you and it are being controlled by corporate law, which is called Statutory Law.  If you are not a corporation, then these laws are not applicable.

2] All Courts under United States, Inc, which includes all the State Courts are Tribunals and all the Judges are Administrators and not Judges, meaning that no real Courts exist!  [The concept of a Court is intended to be a last resort to resolve disputes and therefore you must develop your proof that you are right before you enter.  If you can avoid a Court, do so by all means because everything is stacked against you]!

3] Since they are Tribunals, you must agree to be sued and agree to the intervention of the Court to resolve the dispute!  Return a summons and a suit using this method. Print this boldly across it with your signature notarized.

“I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT AND I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS PROCEDURE.”

4] You’re a living corporation and the property of the State government in which you were born!  When your mother registered you for a Birth Certificate, she gave you away to the State government.  You were assigned a corporate name, which appears on every document you possess in all capital letters!  You had three months at age 18, to rescind that agreement!

5] When you applied for a Social Security No. [or] if you ever applied for any government benefits, you consummated your corporate membership and accepted a new responsibility as Trustee of your corporation for the State!  Whenever you fail to comply with the five million corporate statutes in place, the Courts punish you!

You can thank all your elected Presidents and the Congress for enslaving you!  Instead of pointing our weapon’s at the Middle East, we should be pointing them at our federal and state government!  The Middle East is just a diversion while Congress draws the hangman’s rope tighter.  You’re dealing with the people who taught the Nazi’s about slavery and propaganda!  We even financed Adolph Hitler through the Rothschild Banking Empire.

6] All lawyers are a part of the conspiracy against: WE THE PEOPLE! (((See:  USC location is under search by Hansen, apparently it has been move/hid [It was at 28 USC 3002, section 15a]. Paul, It appears that they changed it again by moving it to another Title and section.  The AG usually does that when a damaging section has been used too many times in the courts. X Judge Dan )))   All BAR judges and attorney/lawyer’s are members of a larger organization titled:  The National Lawyers Guild Communist Party.

((( It is an affiliate of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, which was considered a Soviet front organization by American authors in the decades before the break-up of the Soviet Union. )))

They’re so large an organization and in charge of every -thing that they aren’t afraid to record it for everyone to read!

Sorry, but that’s all the advice I will give you…..and you are now on your own!

Dan 4-21-2011

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Attorney / Deception, Statutory Construction / PERSON | Leave a comment

Judge wrote me- “all” Courts are by consent.

Posted on April 21, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

I Paul Hansen got this letter in response to a blog on state / court authority.

Paul,

I’m a retired Florida District Judge.  I don’t do this stuff anymore and was simply interjecting some guidance.  The best I will do for you is point you…..however you must understand some basic principles first:

1] The republic of United States of America still exists.  It has been concealed in the closet by your elected officials and replaced with “United States, Inc.” and you and it are being controlled by corporate law, which is called Statutory Law.  If you are not a corporation, then these laws are not applicable.

2] All Courts under United States, Inc, which includes all the State Courts are Tribunals and all the Judges are Administrators and not Judges, meaning that no real Courts exist!  [The concept of a Court is intended to be a last resort to resolve disputes and therefore you must develop your proof that you are right before you enter.  If you can avoid a Court, do so by all means because everything is stacked against you]!

3] Since they are Tribunals, you must agree to be sued and agree to the intervention of the Court to resolve the dispute!  Return a summons and a suit using this method. Print this boldly across it with your signature notarized.

“I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT AND I DO NOT CONSENT TO THIS PROCEDURE.”

Dan 4-21-2011

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction / Arraignments, Jurisdiction / General / Travel Right, Jurisdiction / Personal / Subject Matter, Jurisdiction / Territorial | 6 Comments

BANKING AS WE DO NOT KNOW IT

Posted on April 21, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

((SEE below how Judge and his wife were assassinated for revealing the banking fraud.))

The fraudulent Mortgage Note is also sold and the Bank or their agent collects your payments and forwards them to the Bank that purchased your fraudulent Mortgage Note.

[Every fraudulent Mortgage payment tendered is saved in a numbered account and not a named account.  If a fraudulent Mortgage is paid off, the purchaser Bank waits 90 days to prove that you are believed dead because no further activity has occured and then mails a request to the IRS to close the savings account and keep the money on the grounds that the money has been abandoned].  By the way, the sitting Judge on these Foreclosures receives a percentage of the foreclosed property!  Sorry!

♥ Inflation, why before the Federal Reserve
System was there virtually no inflation (money keep its buying
power)? Why is it that you can not get any real return on your
money in the bank?  Bank pays you 4.5%, and inflation is 3.5%,
so you get a net return on your money of 1%, wow, why it would
seem almost best to spend it instead of invest it. Why do banks
tell me they do not need depositors money anymore? Why do
bank tell me that banking is very profitable? Why did the US
Supreme court say that a bank cannot lend [it’s] credit? Why do
banks destroy all the evidence that you used there credit card?

Why do the big banks ‘always‘ sell there ‘written off bad debt’ to debt collectors (lawyers)? Why do bank presidents start, shaking and crying in the witness stand when you ask them if they have any evidence of receiving permission to lend bank credit (created computer entry credits $)? Why do debt collectors (lawyers) dismiss there case when one challenges ‘standing’ (Do you, lawyer dude have evidence of a client?). Why are the big banks buying so many of the small banks? Why do the banks say they lost your original ink signed promissory note (negotiable instrument) when you demand to see it? Why is most everyone in debt to some extent to a credit card issuing national bank. Why have
presidents in the past (before 1933) vehemently opposed Central Banks. Why not challenge the debt collector for the alleged client (national bank) and walk away not owing a dime because, fraud vitiates (voids) all contracts.          Click ‘here‘ to find out why.

>>
Imagine that you call your banker before the judge and offer to pay the morgage/
promissory note/negotiable instrument off if they present the ‘original’ held by the bank.
So the banker shows up under subpoena ‘duces tecum’, instructed to bring the alleged note
in factual possession.
Banker takes the stand and you make the offer to pay with the presentment of the original
‘ink’ signed note you allegedly gave the bank.
Banker said sure, but the notes never leave the bank.
You turn to the Judge and say; “I’ll drive, lets go to the Bank”.
Banker turns beet red.
Judge goes, that would greatly shorten this trial, lets go.
Banker is so happy he is wearing black pants.
We arrive at the Bank and the Judge says OK you said; “The Note is at this bank”.
Banker goes and comes back and says we can’t seem to find it right now.
Judge turns to Banker’s Lawyer and says; “Council in my chambers in 20 minutes”.
Judge says to you, the house is yours and the record will reflect that there is no evidence of
an outstanding loan against the property.
Bank was alleging they had a $175K outstanding promissory note.

UCC (Universal Commercial Code) To prove existence of a note one must prove possession
at time of claim.  No possession no claim(.)

The above is a true story in Nebraska.
You see this Bank sold the note for possibly 10 cents on the dollar and then fraudulently
keep collecting on an instrument they no longer legally had in there possession.  Now also
very interesting is that the party (Bank) that purchased the Note only uses it as collateral
on there books and promises never to collect on it.
Banking fraud is very profitable.

Author is unknown or probably dead because the BIG Banks are not going to let this get out☺

A LOT MORE LATER!  Come to the WTP meetings that are
held the first Monday of every month right here in Omaha.
EM me for details. pauljjhansen@hotmail.com

The above is just one of many wins against the banking
industry currently in Nebraska.
>>>
8. April 08 -♥♥♥ ‘FEDERAL RESERVE‘ – The Biggest Scam in the
History of the World.  An (elite group) scam capable of controlling
any government that allows it to operate in their country.
♥♥♥ ‘History of Money‘ and how the Federal Reserve System
manipulated it.
>>
Why you can beat most all credit card claims (suits).
>>

We do not loan
money, we lend
credit, and we do
not tell anyone
that we can not
(by Federal Law)
charge interest on
Bank Credit.
Banker
Bull

Jerome Daly is one of the few men to take on the might of the Federal Reserve in the courts and won.

40 years ago, a Minnesota bank attempted to foreclose on Daly`s mortgage but he humiliated them, thanks to his profound knowledge of Fractional Reserve
Banking and a courageous, scrupulously honest judge. The judge delivered a dynamite decision that blasted the Federal Reserve and National Banks as
unconstitutional and fraudulent. Understandably, the bankers have tried to bury this case and keep the controversial decree from public knowledge.

Those of you who may be facing the grim prospect of foreclosure on your mortgage, or if you know someone who is facing foreclosure, then the incredible story of
Jerome Daly will delight and amaze you.

Jerome Daly was an attorney in Minnesota in the 1960s. In May, 1964, he took out a mortgage for $14,000 with The First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota,
on a property described as Lot 19, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota.

Somehow, three years later, Mr. Daly fell behind on his mortgage payments and the bank initiated proceedings to foreclose. The case was heard before a jury in
Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, at 10 a.m. on December 7th, 1968. The trial justice was Martin V. Mahoney, a remarkable, no-nonsense man of
great integrity and fair-play.

Jerome Daly, being a lawyer, defended himself. The main witness for the prosecution was a Lawrence V. Morgan, President of The First National Bank of
Montgomery.

The main issues were whether or not the loan transaction constituted a legal `consideration` and whether or not Mr. Daly waived his rights to complain by having
paid his loan for three years.

For any loan transaction to be legal and binding a lawful `consideration` must be brought to the table by both parties. Mr. Daly said that as a consideration he put
up his property of Lot 19, Fairview Beach. Mr. Daly further asserted that the bank provided no consideration but merely created the money out of thin air!

Under cross examination by Jerome Daly, Mr. Morgan the bank president spoke candidly and truthfully. Nevertheless, his evidence astonished the judge and jury.

Mr. Morgan admitted that by making a book-keeping entry the bank created the money out of nothing but that this was standard practice exercised by his bank in
conjunction with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, another private bank. When questioned by Daly he also conceded that he knew of no United States Law
or Statute that gave the bank authority to create money out of nothing.

The court was gobsmacked. Justice Mahoney was heard to say, “That sounds like fraud to me.”

The bank went on to claim that the Defendant, Daly, accepted the ledger book credit and by paying his mortgage for almost three years he waived his right to
complain about the consideration and was legally estopped from doing so.

At 12.15 p.m. the jury returned a verdict. They unanimously found for the Defendant, Jerome Daly.

Justice Mahoney`s Judgment and Decree makes for fascinating reading. Here are some of his major points.

1. The Plaintiff (the bank) was not entitled to recover the possession of Lot 19, Fairview Beach

2. Because there was no lawful consideration the Mortgage was Null and Void

3. The Bank parted with absolutely nothing except a little ink

4. The Plaintiff had no right, title, interest, or lien on the property

5. Defendant is awarded costs in the amount of $75

In his Memorandum Justice Mahoney went on to say, “The jury found there was no lawful consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of
nothing.”

He also said, “Even if the Defendant could be charged with waiver or estoppel as a matter of Law this is no defense [sic] to the Plaintiff. The Law leaves wrongdoers
where it finds them.”

And incredibly… “Plaintiff`s act of creating credit is not authorized by the Constitution and Laws of the United States, is unconstitutional and void, and is not a lawful
consideration in the eyes of the Law to support any thing [sic] or upon which any lawful rights can be built.”

Amazing! A properly accredited U.S. judge actually said this in a properly convened U.S. court!

“…It has never been doubted that a Note given on a Consideration which is prohibited by law is void. It has been determined, independent of Acts of Congress, that
sailing under the license of an enemy is illegal. The emmission [sic] of Bills of Credit upon the books of these private Corporations, for the purposes of private gain
is not warranted by the Constitution of the United States and is unlawful…”

Then the case took another incredible turn.

The bank appealed, as was their right to do so; but a lawful appeal must be made within 10 days and accompanied by fee of $2. If the Clerk of the Court does not
receive the appeal and the appropriate $2 fee within 10 days, as is required by the strict Appeals Statutes, then the District Court does not acquire Jurisdiction upon
Appeal.

When the Notice of Appeal and the $2 fee arrived on Justice Mahoney`s desk for him to make his return to the District Court the judge made a second landmark
decision. After examining the two $1 bills he saw that they were Federal Reserve notes. Justice Mahoney refused the notes and refused to allow the Appeal upon the
grounds that the notes were without any lawful consideration and void for any purpose.

Justice Mahoney would not accept the Federal Reserve notes to pay for the Appeal process because they were not true money but represented instruments of debt.
If the bank had paid in silver dollars, half-dollars, quarters, dimes, nickels, or even pennies, their appeal would have been legitimate and would have been heard.

Justice Mahoney offered the bank a hearing on the issue but they failed to request one. Then the District Court ordered Mahoney to show cause as to why the
Appeal should not be allowed. Mahoney then ordered a hearing on January 22nd, 1969, for the purposes of making Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

But no representative of the First National Bank of Montgomery turned up in court, nor was there any continuance requested by the bank or its attorney.

In his Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Justice Mahoney made some extraordinary observations. The following 12 points are quoted directly from his report
(http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/C…)…

1. The Federal Reserve Banks and National Banks create money and credit upon their books and exercise the ultimate prerogative of expanding and reducing the
supply of money or credit in the United States. The creation of this money or credit constitutes the creation of fiat money upon the books of these banks.

2. When the Federal Reserve Banks and National Banks acquire United States Bonds and Securities, State Bonds and Securities, State Subdivision Bonds and
Securities, mortgages on private Real property and mortgages on private personal property, the said banks create the money and credit upon their books by
bookkeeping entry. The first time that the money comes into existance [sic] is when they create it on their bank books by bookkeeping entry. The banks create it
out of nothing. No substantial fund of gold or silver is back of it, or any fund at all.

3. The Federal Reserve Bank obtains Federal Reserve Notes [no matter what denomination] for the cost of printing of each note which is less than one cent. The net
effect of the entire transaction is that the Federal Reserve Bank obtains Federal Reserve Notes comparable to the ones they placed on file with the Clerk of the
District Court…for the cost of printing only.

4. From 1913 down to date, the Federal Reserve Banks and the National Banks are privately owned. As of March 18, all gold backing is removed from the said
Federal Reserve Notes. No gold or silver backs up these notes.

5. The Federal Reserve Notes in question in this case are unlawful and void…being contrary to Article 1, Section 10, of the Constitution of the United States…are not
lawful money of the United States; are in violation of the Constitution of the United States and are not valid for any purpose.

6. Said Notes are fiat money, not redeemable in gold or silver coin upon their face, not backed by gold or silver, and the notes are in want of some real or
substantial fund being provided for their payment in redemption.

7. The sole consideration paid for the One Dollar Federal Reserve Notes is in the neighborhood of nine-tenths of one cent, and therefore, there is no lawful
consideration behind said Notes…As a matter of fact, the “Notes” are not Notes at all, as they contain no promise to pay.

8. The activity of the Federal Reserve Banks…and the First National Bank of Montgomery is contrary to public policy and the Constitution of the United States and
constitutes an unlawful creation of money and credit and the obtaining of money and credit for no valuable consideration. The activity of said banks in creating
money and credit is not warranted by the Constitution of the United States.

9. The Federal Reserve and National Banks exercise an exclusive monopoly and privilege of creating credit and issuing their Notes at the expense of the public,
which does not receive a fair equivalent. This scheme is for the benefit of an idle monopoly and is used to rob, blackmail and oppress the producers of wealth.

10. The Federal Reserve Act and the National Bank Act is in its operation and effect contrary to the whole letter and spirit of the Constitution of the United States;
confers an unlawful and unnecessary power on private parties; holds all of our fellow citizens in dependence; is subversive to the rights and liberties of the people.
It has defied the lawfully constituted Government of the United States. The two banking Acts and Sec. 462 of Title 31, U.S.C. pages 41 and 42, are therefore
unconstitutional and void.

11. This fraudulent Federal Reserve System and National Banking System has impaired the obligation of Contract, promoted disrespect for the Constitution and Law
and has shaken society to its foundations.

12. No rights can be acquired by fraud. The Federal Reserve Notes are acquired thru [sic] the use of unconstitutional statutes and fraud.

This is a thoroughly amazing legal decision, unprecedented in the history of the United States. Justice Mahoney was not a man to mince his words. He was
courageous in the extreme, perhaps even reckless, to deliver such a decree against the Federal Reserve.

But the great fortitude of this remarkable judge may have cost him his life.

Less than 6 months later, in June, 1969, Justice Martin V. Mahoney died in a mysterious boating accident. Those close to him say his body was heavily poisoned.  Martin was a seasoned boater.

Justice Mahoney`s decree still stands and has not been challenged or overturned to this very day.

We owe it to the memory of this brave man to get his audacious milestone judgment out into mainstream public awareness.

I, Paul Hansen have a Lawyer friend that called the Mahoney’s family months after Martin’s death, My friend Ed said he heard that Martin’s widow also went messing, this is what Ed learned: Martin’s children were to pick up Martin’s widow, they showed up on time, found the house locked, Mr. Martin’s purse  and keys on the kitchen counter, they told Ed they never did find her body.

This is a clear message from the money powers, DO NOT MESS WITH OUR BANKING SYSTEM!
>>
Some citizens, facing foreclosure, have quoted this case as a precedent but ended up losing their cases. Not every judge in America possesses the integrity and
decency of Judge Mahoney. Isn`t it time to stamp out this fraud and corruption that is so endemic in the legal, business, and political institutions of our world today?

Those interested in examining the original documents of this monumental legal decision will find scores of documents at:

http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/C…

A few of the most interesting documents are:

1968-12-09judgmentanddecree
1969-01-06noticeofrefusaltoallowappeal
1969-01-23findingsoffactconclusionsoflawandjudgment
1969-06-26affidavitofJeromeDaly

Some other related sites are:

http://www.freedomdomain.com/bankin…
http://www.cyberclass.net/creditriv…
http://www.restoretherepublic.org/?p=58
http://www.jail4judges.org/JNJ_Libr…

Further reading:

Ellen Brown, “Web of Debt”.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Bank / Credit Cards, Bank / Promissory Note, Banking/Money Issues, Federal Reserve #1 | Leave a comment

Private Attorney General / Counsel??

Posted on April 20, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

A retired District Court Judge gave me this information to go after widespread bank fraud / foreclosure that I have been facing the last 20 years.

This is what the judge said; “You truly need the aid and assistance of a Private Attorney General.  Neither Ed nor I can teach you what you need to know in the short amount of time you have and I’m certainly not going to try! This may sound cruel but you are not my child or my responsibility!”

Private attorney general is an informal term usually used today in the United States to refer to a private party who brings a lawsuit considered to be in the public interest, i.e., benefiting the general public and not just the plaintiff.[1] The person considered “private attorney general” is entitled to recover attorney’s fees if he or she prevails. The rationale behind this principle is to provide extra incentive to private citizens to pursue suits that may be of benefit to society at large.

((Possibly one could be as counsel for a suit and file for fees just as a Licensed Attorney.))

 Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Counsel / Right to | Leave a comment

Attorneys Friend or Foe ??? Attorney, the trappers Agent?

Posted on April 20, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

This is what a Judge told me, Paul Hansen:

” Also, tell your friend not to consult his lawyer because his lawyer is compelled to disclose your plan to the Court! All lawyers are a part of the conspiracy against: WE THE PEOPLE!  See: 28 USC 3002, section 15a…….. All BAR judges and attorney/lawyer’s are members of a larger organization titled: The National Lawyers Guild Communist Party. They’re so large an organization and in charge of every -thing that they aren’t afraid to record it for everyone to read! “

>>

Takes One To Be One!
‘attorn’   vb.  1. To agree to be the tenant of a new landlord.  2. To transfer (money, goods, etc.) to another.     [Black’s Law Dictionary 7th]
ATTORNEY’$,
FRIEND or FOE
Attorney; class that turns / tears, a-torn, twister of truth, “AT” law not ever “IN” law, never entering Gods truth.
At-turn-ey – one who turns peoples titles to land, automobiles, property, away from the people and to the STATE. 

1950 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and ran by communists under definition. Thus any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the American people.

America’s lawyers are controlled by the judges, and don’t really work for you – that’s why they sell you out to the government, or to the big companies that pay bribes.

In the future I hope to reveal how one local man went to his niece (working for a major law firm in Omaha) and asked her to represent him against an ‘failure to file’ case with the IRS.  After consulting with her superiors at the law firm she returned and said; “Yes I can represent you but I am instructed to lose the case, we are not allowed to prevail against the IRS (Government).”

There’s some very special aspects about the way American lawyers are controlled by American judges, which is central to why America’s legal corruption is so much worse than any other advanced nation. Even if you are paying an American lawyer huge amounts of money, he or she doesn’t really work for you, and in fact may sell you down the river to the jail-house.
 

American lawyers are directly under the thumb of the judges and the government, and must submit to the culture of bribery and perversion of justice, or else face terrifying revenge. Lawyers, just like you, can be instantly jailed by an American judge on flimsy pretexts, and American lawyers can be quickly stripped of their right to practice law, and personally and financially destroyed, if they dare to criticize legal corruption. Lawyers who try to fight the system can find themselves not only dis-barred, but also criminally charged and jailed, and no other lawyer will help them. It is a horribly crooked system in America.

This is different from other advanced countries, where lawyers are usually a professional guild, whose status and right to practice law, is under the control of only their fellow lawyers. This means that, in other countries, the judges and the government cannot easily ruin or attack the lawyers for purely political reasons. This is also part of why, in other developed countries, outside of America, you really do see brave lawyers fighting for un-popular clients, or challenging the government, and asking for justice.

But in America, it’s different. Over the past century, the American lawyers lost the right to regulate themselves, and instead fell under the power of the judges. So American lawyers are afraid to do things in court, that the judges don’t want them to do. America’s army of nearly 1 million lawyers, is almost totally under the control of a few thousand judges, with their entrenched culture of bribery and fraud and miscarriage of justice.

Some USA lawyers don’t like this, but they are helpless and can’t fight it. Most lawyers in America have, to one degree or another, signed up with the devil, to do things the way the devil wants them done.
That means that any time you hire an American lawyer, he already is in a conflict of interest. He has to make the judge happy first. And if the judge wants to make the government happy, or make somebody else happy who is paying a big bribe, then guess what? You are destroyed. It doesn’t matter what you paid the lawyer. He works for the judge, first and foremost.

So a totally unique factor in USA legal corruption is the amazingly dishonest profession of American lawyers, these lawyers who “play the game” with America’s judges and politicians and police. It is a savage culture of legal fraud, where lawyers work with judges to rob and terrify people, especially minorities, but also foreigners, and above all those who dare to question the system.

People accused of serious crimes have the “right” to a lawyer, but this may mean only a crooked lawyer who is stage-managing the victim to help the government and prosecutors. If the lawyer does not help the government, he can be put out of work and not “assigned” to any more cases, or treated badly the next time he is in a courtroom. This legal fraud is the core of the danger to those who visit America. A lawyer who is “representing” you in the USA, whether the government is paying him, or even if you are paying him yourself, may just be a stooge who is helping the prosecutors to put you in jail, even though you are innocent.

The judges of America gave every accused criminal the “right” to a lawyer, not because they cared about the rights of the accused, but because it helps stage-manage the victim, with a lawyer who has to do things the judge’s way. In America, such government-appointed lawyers are the means by which hundreds of thousands of poor people are railroaded into prison. Some of these people were just foreign tourists, in the wrong place at the wrong time, and wound up rotting in an American prison.

Some lawyers are fairly subtle about it, and their victims never realize the lawyer has sold them out to the judge and the government. Most American court cases never go to trial, never see a jury; it is the job of the victim’s lawyer to “sell the deal” that the judge has decided will happen, or else. This is how people accept a “plea bargain” so they accept going to jail for 3 years even though they are innocent, instead of going to trial before a jury.

Because of the corruption of lawyers under the thumb of the judges, there’s a very fake and phony aspect of court proceedings in America. They are really fake “show trials” in many cases, sometimes very obviously so, where both purported “sides” of lawyers are actually working together for the government, or for the big corporation or rich person that is bribing the judge.

 

 

 

 

Another true story which will be presented is about a young lawyer who just spent $100K to get a law degree and soon after he started representing a few of his friends in court the judge called him in to his chambers and ordered him to lose the case.  The man was shocked and terrified, but fully aware of the power of the judges to destroy not only him but the firm he worked with.  After a short irrational discourse with himself he yielded and his friends went to jail, with the full knowledge he had all the evidence to prove that they were innocent.  A short time later his conscience caught up with him and also the fact that he was a part of a vastly criminal enterprise he dropped his law practice and went back to farming.  Oh how sad. 

 

 

 

 

Yes lawyer tell me the same story occasionally, and then they most often encourage me to keep fighting
because they say; “You can present arguments that I can not with out being black-listed”, then they say I can not be seen talking to you.     Another lawyer testified against the government and he has been bared from 13     (I believe) states as to practicing law, he claims that they (government) keep following him and prompting each consecutive state to pull his permission to practice law in their state.   It is so sad what People, in authority, have allowed to come upon us. 

 

 

 

 

You will also find, in the American legal system, that you essentially have no recourse whatsoever against wrongdoing by your own lawyer. A lawyer can sell you out, betray you, steal your money, engage in malpractice, help out the other side, hide the evidence that proved you were right, or commit felony crime against you, and there is (almost) nothing you can do about it, so long as the lawyer made the judge happy, and the judge got his cut of any money the lawyer stole from you. (Stay tune for more.)<<< 

Things Hansen has Learned:
If you want to cut a deal, hire a lawyer.  If you want to win, study hard and speak for yourself.
Hansen nev

 

 

 

er yields to Latin > Legal-ease, stick with words that you know, and before you answer question ask them for the definition they are using for key words in their question.
Example-Pro Se = appearing for themselves.
-Pro Per = appearing as themselves.            Believe me in a criminal case the judge will try to get you to agree to “Pro Se”.
Pro Se appearance gives the court ‘in personam’ jurisdiction.
Pro Per, the Plaintiff must prove up jurisdiction “if challenged”.
Appearance with an Attorney as representing you creates an automatic ‘in personam jurisdiction’ = not good.
>>
The court almost always force an attorney on me and every time they have hurt my case.  One time a judge even demanded that I have an attorney the next time I come before him, I assure you that this was done in hopes to guarantee by defeat.  I know now how to stop this.  I’ll give my stories of how the court appointed/forced attorney greatly damaged my defence.
>>
Your odds in US Federal Courts:
90% of those charged take a plea-bargain with a guilty plea. (Usually prompted by your high dollar attorney.)
The balance of 10% have a 90% conviction rate.                  (Most of these have an attorney.)
Leaves 1% that are found not-guilty.  My experience/research is that at the minimum 10% to 25% of the people going into Federal Court are 100% innocent. 

Many are convicted by their lack of ability to defend them-self in a court of law.  Basically the courts complicated procedure produces their own fate, but remember having an attorney almost guaranties even poorer results.
>>>

Attorneys are ‘

 

 

 

Officers of the Court’:
a. They owe their first obligation/allegence to the Court.
b. Second to the BAR association/buddies.
c. Third their clients.  Yes last, far last.  Do you think a local attorney is going to fight for you in anyway that may upset the king/guy in the robe. 

Any court-appointed defense attorney for indigent defendants can not win their case, period.  If you believe that the state/judicial system is going to make an addition (provide you with a lawyer) that insures many of their cases end in a loss, just jump on the Internet and see the thousands of innocent people that are convicted each year.  Did you know America has more people in jail than any nation in the world on a percentage bases.
>>>
$$$ CONTRACTING WITH AND ATTORNEY:  April 22, 2008.
Never prepay an attorney up front if you can at all help it.
I had one attorney take $1600.00 from me for what should have taken three hours at $100/hr.  The guy pumped up the hours every way he could.
He told me that he needed $1,600.00 just in case it goes to trial, it did not and he keep the money.
I have him in court now.  But what are the odds of another attorney/judge giving me a good judgment.  I’ll put the entire case on this site when it is done.
>>>
Side Notes Below:
And when you’ve got your

 

 

 

social security number you said ” I want some welfare, I want some workmen’s comp, I want, I want, I want … and you have my power of attorney to regulate and control me. I’m a fictitious entity. I’m not a human being anymore.” 

When you do that, you give the federal government power of attorney. Then the government gives it to their courts. You become a ward of the court. So, read what a ward of the court is:

Wards of court. Infants and persons of unsound mind … Their rights must be guarded jealously …
Black’s[Law Dictionary], Fifth Edition.

His [attorney] first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and whenever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter.   Corpus Juris Secundum, 1980 Ed.

Clients are also called “wards of the court” in regard to their relationship with their attorneys.
Corpus Juris Secundum, 1980 Ed.

Nobody here looks like an imbecile or and infant to me, but you claim you are, and the courts recognize you as such. That’s why you have to have an attorney, even if you object.
>>>
Attorneys were held in such low regard in England that the trade was abolished in 1873. The root of attorney is ‘attorn’ which means ” to agree to be tenant to a new owner or landlord of the same property”. This trade was firmly established in feodal law. as is the entire legal profession in America. The trade they practice must be “at Law” or in opposition to Law because what they do cannot fit within the 10 commandments.
-attorney c.1303, from O.Fr. aturne “(one) appointed,” pp. of aturner “to decree, assign, appoint,” from a- “to” + turner “turn,” from L. tornare (see turn). The legal L. form attornare influenced the spelling in Anglo-Fr. The sense is of “one appointed to represent another’s interests.” In English law, a private attorney was one appointed to act for another in business or legal affairs (usually for pay); an attorney at law or public attorney was a qualified legal agent in the courts of Common Law who prepared the cases for a barrister, who pleaded them (the equivalent of a solicitor in Chancery). So much a term of contempt in England that it was abolished by the Judicature Act of 1873 and merged with solicitor.

“Johnson observed that ‘he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney.’ ” [Boswell]

The double -t- is a mistaken 15c. attempt to restore a non-existent Latin original. Attorney general first
recorded 1533 in sense of “legal officer of the state” (1292 in Anglo-Fr.), from Fr., hence the odd plural (subject first, adjective second).

>>

 

 

 

 

“7 C.J.S. section 4.  Nature and Duties of Office.

An attorney is an officer of the court with an obligation to the
courts and the public as well as to his clients, and his duty is to
facilitate the administration of justice.  An attorney does not hold
an office or public trust, in the constitutional or statutory sense of
that term, and strictly speaking, he is not an officer of the state or
of a governmental subdivision thereof.  Rather, as held in many
decisions, he is an officer of the court, before which he has been
admitted to practice.  An attorney is not the court or one of its
ministerial officers, or a law enforcement officer.  He is, however,
in a sense an officer of the state, with an obligation to the courts
and to the public no less significant than his obligation to his
clients.  Thus, an attorney occupies a “dual position” which imposes
“dual obligations.”  His first duty is to the courts and the public,
not to the client, and wherever the duties his client conflict with
those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of
justice, the former must yield to the latter.  The office of attorney
is indispensable to the administration of justice and is intimate and
peculiar in its relation to, and vital to the well being of the
court.  An attorney has a duty to aid the court in seeing that actions
and proceedings in which he is engaged as counsel are conducted in a
dignified and orderly manner, free from passion and personal
animosities, and that all causes brought to an issue are tried and
decided on their merits only, to aid the court in seeing that justice
is done, and to aid any effort under the court’s direction to root out
corruption and fraud.  An attorney has also the duty to devote his
ability,   skill, and diligence along ethical and professional lines
to the interests of his client, and to refrain from entering into any
alliance or incurring any obligation connected with the litigation in
which he is engaged as counsel that would place him in a position
where his personal interests would be adverse to those of his
client.”  And;

Now all of you can see the truth that this . . .  “dual position and
obligation,” further deprives all American Citizen’s of their
substantive rights to the due process of law.  When before their
“tribunals” – the attorney’s . . . “first duty is to the courts and
the public, not to the client.”

Did any ATTORNEY ever ask you for a $________.00 for a RETAINER????

Did that ATTORNEY tell you that a RETAINER was and is only a GIFT and
a DONATION????

Did that ATTORNEY tell you that he or she is NOT obligated to do any
work for you on your case for the $5,000.00 to $10,000.00 RETAINER
that you just gave them thinking that you just gave them a DOWN
PAYMENT to WORK ON YOUR CASE????

A “retainer” is a sum of money paid by a client to secure an
attorney’s availability to work for a client.  The fee paid is
considered earned at the time of payment because the attorney is
entitled to  the money regardless of whether he actually performs any
services for the client, and the funds shall not be placed into the
attorneys trust account.  Baranowski v. State Bar, 154 Cal.Rptr. 752,
593 P.2d 613 (1979); and the Washington State Bar News, Committee
Reports, Formal Opinion No. 173.

The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar, supra, clearly
stated that: A “RETAINER IS A SUM OF MONEY PAID BY A CLIENT TO SECURE
AN ATTORNEYS AVAILABILITY TO WORK FOR A CLIENT.”
A RETAINER only pays for the AVAILABILITY of the attorney.
The FACT is that when you make an appointment to talk to an attorney
for a DUI, traffic ticket, domestic violence, driving without a
license, driving while intoxicated, negligent driving or any other
kind of case, they meet with you, they let you TALK for about 5 to 10
to 15 minutes and then they ask you for a $3,000.00 to $5,000.00 to a
$10,000.00 or more as a RETAINER so that you can secure their
availability only!  The California Court in Baranowski v. State Bar,
supra,  clearly stated that . . . THE FEE PAID IS CONSIDERED EARNED AT
THE TIME OF PAYMENT BECAUSE THE ATTORNEY IS ENTITLED TO THE MONEY
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE
CLIENT, . . . and the funds shall NOT be placed into the attorneys
trust account.”
Wow, the attorneys are so stuck up and think that they are so above
us “peons” or “goy dogs”that you have to pay them for merely “gracing
you with their presence” and that they consider the RETAINER earned at
the time you are dumb enough to give it to them REGARDLESS OF WHETHER
HE OR SHE ACTUALLY PERFORMS ANY SERVICES FOR THE CLIENT!!!!

 

 

 

 

Attorneys often get a bad rap, but I believe that there are some (few) that actually hold fast to the truth, and honor God in all their ways.  It appears that the very profession itself gives rise to what some lawyers have told me, and that is: “Having a ‘BAR’ accreditation is a license to steal”.
God bless those lawyers that do not cheat the sheep out of their hard earned wealth.

This page will give insight into why the “good old boys club” is so vulnerable to corruption.  Remember knowledge is power, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Now do not let the 99% of the attorneys give the other 1% a bad name.

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Attorney / Deception | Leave a comment