SSN / How to Stop its Effect.

Posted on April 20, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

To stop the effect of a SSN one must stop using it.

If the SSN was not given to you under full disclosure it essentially was not  given to you, if it was not legally or lawfully given to you then you have never received it (agree to it) failure to disclose is fraud, fraud never conveys a duty, fraud vitiates all contracts.

If you used something a thousand times and find it was in fraud you can stop that moment and it has no legal nexus to you.

Now if one find it is fraudulent and continues using it then one is accepting its terms and can not shout fraud.

If you want to stop something then just stop it.  But do not stop it and start it and hope to stop it again.  A SSN does remove your “free inhabitant” standing and make you a “US subject” “if” contractually received correctly (absent fraud), which always occurs when a person of age is naturalized in the US.

So you are in the witness stand and asked like I have been several times; do you Mr. Hansen have a SSN”?  I say no. They ask again, but this time screaming, stomping, fist waving in the air, I say softly; “asked and answered”.

I never ever ever want to say:  a. I had a SSN.   b. I once used a SSN.  c. I do not use a card anymore.  The very word of used is an act of will, do not go there.

They will use it against you very aggressively.

You see you must tell the truth.  No SSN because of no full disclosure.  The lack of disclosure is a designed trap, a form of involuntary slavery.  But keep your mouth shut, this keeps the burden of proof on the accuser (USA), and keeps the trial much shorter because they do not want to get in the position of proving you had full disclosure, like hundreds of millions of others did not/have not received.

Say no and say no more, keep your mouth shut.  If they show me a thousand document with my alleged “signature” and SSN it makes no difference, the answer is I have never had a SSN and I never want one.  Signature means agreement-if fraud is involved how could that be an agreement.

Now if you want the benefits and services that are exclusive to US citizens then you need that SSN.  Be careful it may be better in your situation to stay with their system, for some it works very well.  As for me I want to stay out as a witness to all who watch that one need not be a subject to the USA inc.  If no one stays out no one will know one can stay out.

Never ask the US government where its authority comes from, they haven’t a clue.        paul john hansen

 Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in S.S. Number Disclosure Law, Social Security / Disclosure Law Limited | 1 Comment

IRS / Sheriff Sales / Authority ????

Posted on April 17, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

A Lawyer friend of mine who was an expert in IRS law purposely let his house sale at a “IRS / Sheriff sale, he sued for quiet title action, put IRS agent in the witness-stand and asked the following:
Q1.  Did you instruct the sheriff to sell my house?
A. Yes.
Q2. Did you own the house?
A. No.
Q3. Did the owner of the house give you permission or authority to sell the house?
A. No.
Q4. Are you well trained and qualified to do your job?
A. Yes.
Q3. Did you have a court order, warrant, or judgment to sell the subject house?
A. No.

Then my friend turned to the judge and said, being that the USA government can only sell that which they owns with out a court order, warrant, or judgment, judge is there anything more we need to discuss at this hearing?
The Judge said no, adding that the house is to be returned back to Ed, my friend.
It was a 15 minute hearing.

Ed said the family that purchased the house may fave never got their money back.

((All sheriff / IRS sales are AS-IS / no warranty deed.))

I always let the sheriff know there is no court order when he is “invited” to sell a property.

>>

From: edrivera@edrivera.com
To: XXX
Subject: RE: Sheriff’s sale
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 08:28:33 -0700

 

Richard,

Sheriff’s sales are evidenced by a deed which does not warrant or guarantee of  title in the property allegedly subject to sale for non-payment of some alleged debt.  In fact, such sales are based on an expressed disclaimer of any right, title or interest.

Ed

>>

From: XXX
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 7:15 AM
To: edrivera@edrivera.com
Subject: Sheriff’s sale

Ed,

Have there been any successes in our group to stop a Sheriff,s sale of one’s home, using what you have taught us.  Or does the Sheriff simply ignore the truth and sell the home?

Richard

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in IRS | Leave a comment

TAX / IRS / Lies / Liens-Levys

Posted on April 15, 2011 by Paul John Hansen
IRS Liens and Levys

 

IRS-The Biggest Lie and Scam in World History

www.ricoforsheriff.com/platforms/irs-liens-and-levys

 

IRS-probably the three most frightening letters in the English language.    This deep-seated fear and loathing serves a very specific purpose.  It serves to keep the People of America in submission to an illusion, a lie.

The IRS has a horrible reputation and has earned every bit of it, has by their own admissions committed crimes against innocent Citizens, and continues today to be the “Gestapo” of America.  They confiscate more homes, destroy more families, take more money, ruin more lives, and commit more crimes than all the street gangs combined.  They are indeed vivid proof that the greatest threat we face, as a nation, is our own Federal “Government.” [The County Sheriff: America’s Last Hope.  Author Richard Mack].

Here it is in a nutshell.  The IRS is a private, debt collection agency for the private banking system known as the Federal Reserve Bank.  The IRS is not a government agency.  I repeat, the IRS is not a government agency.  Never has been, never will be.

The IRS is formerly the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) situated in and with authority only in the Philippine Islands (Trust Fund # 61), and moved into Puerto Rico (Trust Fund # 62).  In the 1950’s, with the stroke of the pen, the BIR was transformed into the current notorious IRS and brought onto the 50 united States.  This was done without any Congressional authority whatsoever.  There is no Congressional authority for the IRS to exist and operate in the 50 states recorded anywhere in any law-books.  Again, keep in mind, that the IRS is the “Private, debt collection agency for the private banking system known as the Federal Reserve Banks”.

Consider this fact.  When an IRS agent wants to seize property from a Citizen in a County, they must first contact the Sheriff of the County and request assistance in the seizure.  This is simply because the IRS agent has no authority to seize any property at all.  So the IRS agent bamboozles the Sheriff into committing the crime for the IRS.  When the Sheriff seizes property from a Citizen under the non-authority of the IRS agent, the Sheriff has committed a Second Degree Felony, Conversion of Property.

A second degree felony is incredibly serious.  However, both the IRS agent and the Sheriff count on the abysmal ignorance of the Citizen who has no idea what their Lawful Rights are.  Bear this point in mind, if the IRS agent has no authority to seize any property at all, then they cannot delegate or confer to the Sheriff what they themselves do not have.  In addition, the Sheriff has no idea that he has engaged in a serious crime.  Here is where the maxim applies, “Ignorance of the law, is no excuse for violating the law.”   Both the IRS agent and the Sheriff should be arrested and charged with Conversion of property, a second degree felony.

Tyranny is defined as:  Dominance through threat of punishment and violence, oppressive rule, abusive government, cruelty and injustice.  What better definition than  this fits the abusive IRS.

America is using a private credit system wherein the medium of exchange are the Federal Reserve Notes that we call “Dollars”.  Hence, the so-called “Income Tax” is in reality nothing more than a disguised “User Fee” that Americans must pay to the Federal Reserve Bank for using their private credit system. [research Title 12, USC].

The legal definition of “dollar” is “a gold or silver coin of a specific weight and with specific markings”.  Thus, a Federal Reserve Note, is not and cannot, ever be a dollar.  A Note is not “money”, see Blacks Law Dictionary.  The Federal Reserve Notes in use are mere evidence of a debt.

The Federal Reserve Banking system is not a Federal government agency, there are not “reserves” and there is no real money.  The Federal Reserve Banking system is a private cartel that has usurped the authority of the Congress to coin Money.   Federal Reserve Notes are just as worthless or just as valuable as Monopoly Money used in the game “Monopoly”.  If we go to this Constitution for the united States of America, Article I, section 8, we find that only Congress was given the authority “To coin money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures”.

This authority given to Congress by this Constitution for the united States of America was not to be delegated to any private corporation for that corporation’s private gain.

The authority to coin money was usurped by the unlawful enactment of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.  The Federal Reserve Act is a “private law” passed by four Congressmen after the Congressional session closed in December of 1913.  Congress can pass both private laws and public laws.  Congress does not have to tell the American Citizens which law is private and which law is public.  We are simply led to believe that all laws are public.  This is propaganda and brainwashing at its best.

This was a silent coup d’ e-tat wherein the American People became the slaves of the Federal Reserve Bank.  The “Killing Blow”, the coup de grace[pronounced gra] was delivered upon the American People by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933 by removing the Gold Standard from the American economy.

Since then, no American Citizen has actually paid for anything, we have just exchanged worthless Federal Reserved Notes for more worthless Federal Reserve Notes.  All we do is lease the property from the “STATE OF NEW MEXICO”, we lease our cars, we lease our houses, WE OWN NOTHING.  Since 1933 no American has owned their property in Allodium.  That is why the “STATE OF NEW MEXICO” can take our property for just about any reason, i.e Eminent domain, failure to pay so-called “property taxes”, etc.

For anyone that has ever dealt with a debt collection agency, you know how nasty, mean and dirty they can be.  Now, take that nastiness, that mean-ness and dirtiness and multiply it one hundred fold, there you have the attitude of the IRS.

Let’s continue down the Rabbit Hole.  When an American Citizen gets into a dispute with the IRS, the IRS agent will not listen to any of your pleadings, your begging or your excuses.  Everything you do or say amounts to nothing with the IRS.  If you dig in your heels and refuse to pay, the IRS starts sending you threatening letters with dire consequences for your non-cooperation.

If you still refuse to pay, the IRS will file a document called a “Notice of Federal Tax Lien” in the local County Clerk’s office.  This is a very deceptive document.  Keep one thing in mind a “Notice” is not the “Lien” itself.  The “Lien” is a totally separate and distinct document from the “Notice”.  The County Clerk, through abysmal ignorance files the “Notice of Federal Tax Lien” as if it was an actual “Lien”.  These are two separate and distinct documents.  The County Clerk never requests the actual “Lien” from the IRS agent.  If they were to request this document, the IRS agent would get very irate and threaten the County Clerk for their non-cooperation.  Of course, the actual “Lien” does not exist anywhere in the known Universe.

There is one more lawful requirement that the County Clerk must comply with before they can file the “Notice of Federal Tax Lien” or the actual “Lien” itself.  The Federal Lien Registration Act requires “Certification” of the “Lien” itself. This would require that the IRS agent file an Affidavit wherein they identify themselves, and state under Oath that there is an actual “Lien” filed based on an actual assessment on form 23C against the particular American Citizen.  When the County Clerk fails to verify “Certification” they violate the lawful requirements of the Federal Lien Registration Act.

The IRS never files the actual “Lien” because it does not exist.  An actual “Lien” must be based on a lawful assessment on form 23C.   In the entire history of the IRS, the IRS has never produced a form 23C showing an individual assessment against an American Citizen.

This so-called “Notice of Federal Tax Lien” is an act of “Financial Terrorism” because once this “Notice” is filed, you become a pariah, a financial outcast, you are branded as unfit, you are no longer a “good slave”, you are a rebel beyond the hope of redemption.  Your slave “Credit Rating” takes a nosedive.  You are practically ruined financially.

Interestingly, Section 803 of the so-called PATRIOT ACT defines terrorism as “any act intended to coerce or threaten a civilian population”.  So by the very definition of “Terrorism”, the IRS is the largest, meanest, dirtiest, Terrorist Organization in the entire world.

If you still are not intimidated, the IRS will file a “Notice of Levy” with the County Clerk, and send copies to your bank(s) and employer.  The County Clerk, through abysmal ignorance, files the “Notice of Levy” as if it were an actual “Levy”.  These are two separate and distinct documents.

Again, keep in mind, a “Notice” is not a “Levy”.  On this “Notice” alone, the bank then hands over all of your money to the IRS and you cannot even pay your bills.  Your employer garnishes your paycheck, and again, you are the slave of the Federal Reserve Bank.  Your Bank treats the “Notice of Levy” as if it were an actual “Levy”.  Your employer also treats the “Notice of Levy” as if it were an actual “Levy”.  The bank and your employer never request an actual copy of the “Levy” itself.  Of course, the actual “Levy” does not exist anywhere in the known Universe.

There are several things wrong with these two scenarios.  Both the bank and your employer fail to verify several key pieces of information in dealing with the IRS agent.

First, they fail to ask for a copy of the IRS agent’s drivers license to verify that in fact they are who they say they are.  Also, in case, the IRS agent has to be served with legal process, they can be located.  All IRS agents have been given instructions to never provide this information to any one asking for it.  Thus, the true identity of the IRS agent is never established.  Pretty convenient, huh!

Second, the bank and your employer fail to request a copy of the “Pocket Commission” from the IRS agent.  Every IRS agent receives what is called a “Pocket Commission”.  This “Pocket Commission” identifies the IRS agent’s authority as to his/her actions.  The most common “Pocket Commission” is what is called “Administrative”.  This is identified with a capital “A” on their identity card.  This means that this IRS agent can shuffle paperwork all day, but he/she does not have any “Enforcement” authority whatsoever.

The other “Pocket Commission” is what is called “Enforcement”.  The word “Enforcement” might convey the message that this IRS agent actually has unlimited authority to “Enforce” something against American Citizens.  That is not the case at all.  They have an extremely limited scope of authority.  In fact, they cannot enforce anything against American Citizens.

Both the bank and your employer fail to request a copy of the “Pocket Commission” from the IRS agent in order to establish the authority of the IRS agent.  I am fairly confident that all agents that send out notices to banks and employers have an “Administrative Pocket Commission”.  Thus, both your bank and your employer steal your money and send it to a Terrorist Agency known as the IRS.

Thirdly, the bank and your employer fail to request a copy of the actual assessment on form 23C.  Again, never in the history of this country has an American Citizen been assessed an Income Tax on a form 23C.  Without this so-called assessment on this specific form, form 23C, there is no debt.  So the bank and your employer fail to verify this alleged debt and thus, steal your money.

Fourth, the bank and your employer fail to request of copy of the “Abstract of the Court Judgment”.  This document would show that you were actually sued by the IRS and that you had your day in court.  The Seventh Amendment of the Bill of Rights of this Constitution for the united States of America guarantees you the Right of Trial by Jury in any controversy where the amount shall exceed twenty dollars.  Of course, you were never sued and you never had your day in court.  Thus, your Due Process of Law Rights are totally violated and again, you are further enslaved to the Federal Reserve Bank.

So then, we come to the end of the Rabbit Hole.  You have never owed any money to the IRS.  The IRS is simply the enforcer, the debt collector for the Federal Reserve Banking System.  However, because you are using a private credit system, wherein the medium of exchange are fancy pieces of paper called Federal Reserve Notes, you owe the Federal Reserve Bank a “user fee”.

By way of information, the IRS does not have a bank account wherein your tax payments are deposited.  All of your tax payments are deposited into the bank account of the Federal Reserve Bank in one region or another.

The Federal Reserve Banks and the IRS constitute the single largest sting operation, the single largest fraud and the single largest swindle in the history of the World.

In order to keep this “Alice in Wonderland” illusion going, the so-called “government” developed an entire industry to support and perpetuate this fraud.  The tax preparation industry.  Tax preparers, accountants, so-called Certified Public Accountants, self proclaimed financial gurus advising about tax loopholes, etc., etc.

All the current paycheck garnishments in the entire country could be stopped by having your employer request the above mentioned documents, to wit:

  1. A copy of the Driver’s License of the IRS agent
  2. A copy of the “Pocket Commission” showing the authority of the IRS agent
  3. A copy of the assessment shown on form 23C against the American Citizen
  4. A copy of the “Abstract of the Court Judgment” that verifies that you had a trial by jury.

As Sheriff of San Miguel County, I will provide educational classes to the County Clerk and the employers who are currently garnishing wages and paychecks to identify areas where they may have broken the law and unwittingly stolen their employees Federal Reserve Notes and thus committed “Conversion of Property”, a second degree felony.

Furthermore, I will work closely with the County Clerk through education and knowledge so that the Clerk can stop breaking the law and committing financial terrorism against the Citizens of San Miguel County.

When the Citizens of San Miguel County elect me as their new Sheriff in town, I will ban the IRS from San Miguel County, and if I catch an IRS agent within the boundaries of the county, without my permission, I will arrest them for TRESPASSING.

 

– Rico S. Giron, Future Sheriff of San Miguel County

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in IRS | Leave a comment

State, “in this state”, “this state”, a USA possession

Posted on April 10, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Your “State” is not the state you thought it was stating:

All the States have this in their statutes.

They teach you to claim the state as your safety, and in reality it is a trap in getting you to become a subject of the USA government, (US written corporate (written) law) in the place of your free man standing.

>>

California Statute 6017  “In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and “includes” all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America. (“Includes” means that which is only what is included, your land probably is not included.)

California Statute 60017  “In this state” or “in the state” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States.

>>

Here are all of them for THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA:

Sections of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California that specifically limit taxation to federal territory within California

5304.  “In this State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California, and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

6017.  “In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

7321.  “In this state” or “in the state” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

8609.  “In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

11205.  “In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

30013.  “In this State” or “in the State” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

40006.  “In this state” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within those limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

41005.  “In this state” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within those limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

43009.  “In this state” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within those limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

45008.  “In this state” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within those limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.

60017.  “In this state” or “in the state” means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States.

((( Best way to find “in this state“, “state“, or “this state“, is to copy the “definition” page in your state statutes and past it in a WORD document, then do a search on each term. The the terms the state uses will be there defined. They hid them well, and every year it becomes harder and harder to locate them. )))

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in State / "in this state" / "this state" | 4 Comments

Doug Sanford, Omaha, Nebraska, Jim Sanford

Posted on April 9, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Doug Sanford and his Father Jim Sanford should repent and pay what he and his fancy lawyer, probably one of the judge’s sons, took from me by what I can only call deceit and fraud.

See Picture of Doug > https://www.facebook.com/doug.sanford.75/photos

I hire a church friend named Doug Sanford, Omaha, Nebraska.

Paid him by the hour, at $8.00, for unsupervised general labor on my rental properties.

He worked at 1/2 speed so 1/2 pay was acceptable to him.

Rented to him for $300.00 per month all utilities paid.

Doug got behind on rent in the amount of $3,600.00.  Promising he would pay me eventually.  Each week Doug and I sat before the computer spread-sheet and made sure the billings and hours for rent and labor were correct.

Doug then rented a house from me for $250.00 per month, he paid his own utilities.

Doug and I had an agreement that he could work on the $250.00 house and keep track of the hours so that they would cancel out the rent owed me on that same house alone.

Doug put in new cabinets, assuring me that I was not being charged but that it was going to the rent he owed me for 16 months of rent at $250.00.

One day I get a bill for a $298.00 nail gun that Doug charged to my account, I was angry, he promised to pay me, Doug never had permission to purchase tools in my account.

Doug moves out with out even telling me, no letter, refusing my phone calls.

One year later I get a bill from his father for the cabinets, his father claimed I personally told him to put in the cabinets and that we agreed on a price.  I never talked to him about ever paying any $1,790.00 for any cabinets, we did talk about his son putting them in for owing me on back rent, he was systematically lying.

Two and a half years latter I get a labor bill from Doug at $31.00 per hour for work he claimed I did not pay him for, mostly for work he claimed on the $250.00 rent house.

Much of the work was associated to a new floor in the kitchen and bathroom, now this is where it really gets weird.  Doug put ½ drywall as the sub flooring, with 1/16 cheep tile glued on top of it in the bathroom and the kitchen. Oh what a mess, it just fell apart soon after he moved out, just crumbled to nothing.  Also he put in pluming that did not even come close to being compliant to code.  SEE the court response I put in below.

I am writing this because Doug took me to Court, and the judges gave him and his father the award, and the judge added that I do not get my rent because I never demanded it from Doug, even though I testified that Doug was shown every week what he was to pay me, and it was understood that certain work was going for it.

Doug took me for more than $5,000.00, his Dad stole $1,790.00.

Doug did not pay me for back rent, took the nail gun, and then charged me exorbitant rates again for work done, that work was, if anything was to go to rent.

I strongly recommend that you not trust or do business with men like this.

>>>

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA

 

DOUG SANFORD, DOC. 1045  PAGE 808  )

Plaintiff, and Defendant on Counter Claim  )

-vs- MOTION

)  TO DISMISS / VACATE

Paul John Hansen)

Defendant. and Plaintiff on Counter Claim )

COMES NOW, Hansen, Defendant, and motions this court to vacate this case for constitutional due process violations on the record.  Pertaining to constitutional ˜meaningful time and meaningful manner of access to this captioned court.

Did not consider accounting ledger as a billing tords Plaintiff.

Would not allow Hansen to testify as to the non-availability of Hansen ˜demand letters for payment sent to Sanford that was not available, to Hansen, at the trial.

This Brief is presented to support Defendant’s challenge to Plaintiff’s Complaint,

point for point.

Hereinafter “Sanford” shall mean Doug Sanford, as Plaintiff.

Hereinafter “Hansen” shall mean Paul Hansen, as Defendant.

NOTICE  — [  ] < numbers in box apprentices is a direct challenge to a specific paragraph in Plaintiff’s original Complaint. (Example [3] < pertains to paragraph three in Plaintiffâ’s Complaint.)

NOTE “ 1548 N 19th Street is the same house as 1548 Florence BLVD.

NOTE – Numbering identifier is on the left side of the page (red pin) on many of the exhibits with several pages included.

  1. Sanford lived at Hansen’s house at 1548 N 19th Street, Omaha, from approximately September 11, 2000 to November 2001.  See EXHIBIT page 17 marked as EX ” __” also.

See EXHIBIT “2” page 2 of 5, par. 7.

  1. [3] Sanford was paid weekly at a rate of $8.00 per hour for his intermittent services to Hansen. See EXHIBIT “€” page 1 of 5, par. 4.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 29, par. 21.  <Sanford denies a base pay of $8.00 per hour.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 49,  par. 20.  < Sanford admits a base pay of $8.00 per hour.

  1. [3] Sanford at various times worked for Hansen and Sanford had his own construction ventures as he worked for Hansen during this time that Sanford lived in 1548 N 19 house.
  2. Sanford was paid weekly by directly check payments and cash payments from Hansen and also at times applied such compensation directly to moneys due to Hansen for rents and his percentage of utilities and various miscellaneous expenses that accumulated as he was in 1548 N 19 Street House.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 24, par. 2.  Sanford admits paying some rents with labor exchange.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 25, par. 4 and 5 and 6.  Also page 26, par. 7, 8 and 9.

  1. Sanford was paying $300.00 monthly rent for living in 1548 N 19 house per month.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 9, par. 2.  Denies $300.00 was the monthly rent at 1548 N 19.

See EXHIBIT “1”, page 5.  Sanford admits to owing 12.5 months at $300.00 per month at 1548 N 19th Street.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 10, par. 6.  Sanford admits he has not paid past Hansen for rents.

  1. Sanford, also, was to pay Hansen his share of utilities and miscellaneous expense as was agreed to at 1548 N 19 property.

See EXHIBIT “€”. Sanford signed a copy of a billing from Hansen on or about March 2001.

See EXHIBIT “€”.  Billing that Sanford signed.

See EXHIBIT “€” page 9, par. 3.  Sanford admits to sharing the cost of utilities at 1548 N 19.

  1. Sanford moved out the last day of November 2001 from 1548 N 19 with an amount due and owing to Hansen of $3613.08.

Sanford then immediately moved into Hansen’s property of 3202 Seward with rent starting on December 01, 2001. See EXHIBIT “€”, par. 7.

  1. Sanford agreed to pay Hansen $250.00 for a monthly rent at 3202 Seward.

See EXHIBIT “€”, par. 1.

See EXHIBIT “€”, par. 1 and page 3.

See EXHIBIT “€”, par.1 and page 3.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 15, par. 32.  Sanford denies agreement to pay $250.00 per month.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 34, par. 7.  Sanford denies that letter dated 6-22-03 which is now Exhibit “€”, is an agreement for rent at Seward.

  1. Sanford did unsupervised work on 3202 Seward as he lived at the property.
  2. [4] [6] Sanford entered into a rental agreement of $250.00 per month at 3202 Seward property and Sanford was to do work on the house that was to be applied to the back rents owed to Hansen. See EXHIBIT “€”, page 7.  Sanford agreeing to pay 16 months rent at $250.00.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 11, par. 12.  Sanford denies any agreement to pay $250.00 rent at Seward.

  1. Sanford made no payments as to rents or utilities to Hansen upon moving out of 1548 N 19th Street House.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 10, par. 6.  Sanford admitted not paying rent for 1548 N 19.

  1. [3] Sanford worked for Hansen and had his own (Sanford’s) construction ventures running at the same time that Sanford worked for Hansen during the time that Sanford lived in 1548 N 19 and 3202 Seward Houses.
  2. Sanford had MUD and OPPD utilities at the 3202 Seward property in Sanford’s name at all times as he lived there.
  3. Sanford lived at 3202 Seward for 16 months and moved out on the date of March 31, 2003.
  4. Sanford moved out of Hansen’s 3202 Seward property without any notice to Hansen.
  5. Sanford purchased a pneumatic (air) nail gun, valued at $298.23 with Hansen’s credit with out Hansen’s permission on February 12, 2000.
  6. Sanford took Hansen’s pneumatic (air) nail gun, valued at $298.23, with Sanford when he moved out of the Seward property.
  7. Sanford wrote a letter to Hansen (dated June-6-2003) asking to settle up bill for past rents to 1548 N 19 & 3202 Seward property.
  8. Hansen sent Sanford a copy (mid June 2003) of the balance remaining at the 1548 N 19 House and advised Sanford to add 3202 Seward rents to the same.

See EXHIBIT “€”, par.1. < admitted to general expenses from 1548 Florence BLVD.

  1. Sanford first bill (dated June-22-2003), 3 months after he quit working for Hansen and also moved out of 3202 Seward property, Sanford sent to Hansen, at a rate of $20.00 per hour, billing of unsupervised labor and purchases on 3213 N 24 Street property and 3202 Seward.
  2. [14] Hansen disputed Sanford’s billing by a letter dated July 30-2003.

See EXHIBIT “€”, see highlighted portions.

  1. Sanford second (adjusted) bill (dated August 18, 2003), 5 months after Sanford quit working for Hansen and also moved out of 3202 Seward property, Sanford sent to Hansen, at a rate of $31.00 per hour, billing of unsupervised labor and purchases on 3213 N 24 Street property and 3202 Seward.
  2. [12] Sanford has chosen to take it upon himself to change his hourly wages of $8.00 to $20.00 and then again to $31.00 per hour. Note that in no place in Sanford’s pleadings does he say anything about an agreement for wages other than the admission of $8.00 per hour.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 49, par. 19.  Sanford admits no agreement for Seward hourly wage.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 50, par. 23 d e. Sanford claims he got $20.00 per hour for other jobs but had no evidence to offer who the clients were.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 50, par. 24.  Sanford claim he has worked for Tracey Drywall Construction 1.5 years.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 50, par. 25. Sanford claims he was paid $13.00 per hour and $50.00 per hour for his own construction business.

  1. [14] Hansen again disputed Sanford’s billing by a letter dated some time in August 2003.
  2. Hansen gave Sanford full print outs of funds due from the 1548 N 19 Street property on a monthly bases, or when ever Sanford asked for a copy. Sanford signed such a print out dated March 1, 2001.
  3. Hansen did not know that his (Hansen’s) pneumatic air gun was in the possession of the Sanford at the time that Sanford moved out of 3202 Seward.
  4. Sanford admits to purchasing said nail gun with Hansen’s credit. See EXHIBIT “€”, page 10, par. 7.
  5. Sanford admits he had no permission to make said nail gun purchase. See EXHIBI “€”, page 10, par. 8.
  6. Sanford admits he had no permission to take said nail gun when moving out. See EXHIBIT “€”, page 11, par. 9.
  7. [11] Sanford’s took it upon himself to remove, functioning existing plumbing, and install his own version of plumbing, as he was living in the 3202 Seward house, the work that was preformed on 3202 Seward, as with plumbing, is a catastrophe and needs to be removed and replaced under code at the estimated cost of $2,160.00.

See EXHIBIT “€”.  Hot water heater not code.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 13, par. 19.  Admits to doing the plumbing work.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 12, par. 14.  Admits he had no permission to do regulated repairs.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 3.

  1. [11] Sanford took it upon himself to lay down a bathroom and kitchen floor with inferior products for his own personal living benefit that also ended in a catastrophe, and also needs to be removed and replaced under code at the estimated cost of $1,968.00.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 1 and 2.

  1. Sanford denies using ½ inch drywall on floor.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 14, par. 25.  Sanford admits to laying the floor down.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 14, par. 26.  Sanford denies laying down drywall for the floor.

See EXHIBIT “24”, page 28, par. 18.  Sanford denies laying down ½ inch drywall for the floor.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 48, par. 17.  Sanford claims that the flooring was cement board. Note Sanford is at this time working full time for a drywall company “Tract Drywall”.  Yet he does not know the difference between drywall and cement board?

  1. Sanford admits that he did work on the Seward property that required a license.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 12, par. 14.

See EXHIBIT “€”, page 12, par. 17.

  1. Sanford therefore owes Hansen for the following:
  1. 1548 N 19 Rents, Utilities, and miscellaneous expenses. — $3613.08.
  2. 3202 Seward Rent.                                                                 — $4000.00
  3. New pneumatic air gun.                                                         — $ 298.23
  4. 3202 Seward removal and replacement of the kitchen floor.  — $1540.00
  5. 3202 Seward removal and replacement of the bathroom floor.  — $ 428.00
  6. 3202 Seward removal and replacement of the plumbing system. — $2160.00
  1. Sanford only possible work done on 3202 Seward property that was beyond the normal activities of a tenant would be the flooring and the plumbing, to which, is work that needs to be removed and replacement in its entirety, at a greater cost than if the tenant would have not attempted to do the work himself apart from any aid of an professional or skilled individual.
  2. Sanford charges to the Hansen for the above, plumbing and flooring, work is not justifiable for Sanford’s complete failure to perform code standard results, and even led to questionable fraud and deception.  [ pretense of a sub-floor, pretense of pluming venting ]
  3. [15] No home sale agreement was ever created that comprised of offer, acceptance, consideration, nor is any evidence of such an agreement in writing.
  4. The assessed value of 3202 Seward as of February 01, 2001 was $13,300.00.

See EXHIBIT “15”.  See EXHIBIT “€”.

  1. Hansen made purchases for improvements to 3213 N 24.

See EXHIBIT “17” and “18” and “19”.

See EXHIBIT “23”, par.  Fox Hill Custom Cabinets alleged valued at $1,790.00.

Note – cabinets where not ordered by Hansen but by Sanford, Hansen explicitly said to Sanford; “The currant cabinets are fine any improved models are to be for your own enjoyment and the cost to be covered by you (Sanford).”

39. Due in part to Sanford’s poor workmanship the House is scheduled for demolition by the Omaha Planning Department.  See EXHIBIT “22”, page 2, par.3c, and page 10, page 13, page 22, page 30, page 31, Dated May 7, 2007  _________________

Paul John Hansen

1548 N 19th Street

402-671-0526  Omaha, Nebraska, 68110

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the two (7 page) Master trial – BRIEFS, dated May 7, 2007, as associated with the above captioned case, was served by hand, on the following parties, on this day of May 8, 2007 :

Joseph S. Risko

P.O. Box 241358

8742 Frederick Street

Omaha, NE 68124-5358

_______________________________________

Paul John Hansen

Click HERE to view the list of foundational information created by Lawyer Paul John Hansen to aid in independence from the US System.

Posted in Doug Sanford, Doug Sanford / Jim Sanford | Leave a comment

Mega hits on My Site.

Posted on April 8, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Successful requests: 6,739.   (That is 350,000 hits a year.)

The above is the number of people browsing and reading on this site in the last 7 days of April 8, 2011.

Tell your friend that is they want solid foundational law remedies of all types to stop in.

If I can get enough traffic, I can start advertising on this site and get paid and even do a better job of getting the truth out.

Posted in www. Activity on my Site. | Leave a comment

Property Tax for Land only “IN” “this Constitution”.

Posted on April 8, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

This Constitution, this Constitution, this Constitution, this Constitution, this Constitution, this Constitution, this Constitution, this Constitution, this Constitution, this Constitution and this Constitution

The Constitution of September 17, 1787 contains one Preamble and seven Articles.  The phrase “this Constitution”  appears at least once in the Preamble and in each of the seven Articles.  The phrase “this Constitution” appears twice in Article V and three times in Article VI for a total of eleven times in the entire Constitution of September 17, 1787 and the Preamble.

“This Constitution” is the May 25, 1787 Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Style’s way of explaining that the Constitution of September 17, 1787 is not the Federal Constitution, the no laws no taxes Constitution.  In other words, “this Constitution” is of  these entities:  “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers…”  If you pay property taxes where you live, Article I Section 2 Clause 3 is the real source of that tax, so wouldn’t you like to swap “this Constitution” for the Federal Constitution.

“This Constitution,”  provides in Article VII that “The Ratification of the Conventions of nine States, shall be sufficient for the Establishment of this Constitution between the States so ratifying the Same.” Ratification is the confirmation of  what was done by the delegates to the secret May 25, 1787 Constitutional Convention and all that was a revision of  the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777.

“This Constitution” began as a revision of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777, succeeded at that, but failed as a Constitution, as far as the people are concerned, when no Officers of government would adopt it.  It has survived as the Constitution of the United States, because the United States is just another name for the territory and other property belonging to the  only real government in America, the United States of America.

You can learn to read this Post and federal laws much more complicated with just a few Lessons sent to you as e-mails.  If you can find the eleven times “this Constitution” appears in the Constitution of September 17, 1787, you can learn all the secrets of the Constitution.  “This Constitution” is not taught in any other law school.  To enroll in my Basic Course in Law and Government, contact me at edrivera@edrivera.com

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera

Posted in Taxes / Property | Leave a comment

Motor Vehicle, private property ??

Posted on April 8, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

The below is not proofed by Paul John Hansen, but on a quick read it is quite powerful.  Hope to learn the results soon.   Who hols the MSO may be the determining factor.

>>

A man given the name Dannie J Mael and woman given the name Patricia A Mael, who are neither federal citizens of Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, America Samoa, Guam, or Northern Mariana Islands nor national citizens of the United States located within the District of Columbia, are in receipt of a federal government computer generated form addressed to a person and showing the Property Location to be a Post Box styled 5900 NE 42nd St. Kansas City, Missouri a place, within the boundary lines of a place called The County of Clay County Missouri, purchased by, ceded and titled to the United States of America used for military purposes, under the jurisdiction of the federal government and concurrent jurisdiction of this state. We will never be found there.

 

Missouri is one of (50) States of the Confederacy, the United States of America, where the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 still applies. The federal territory The County of Clay County Missouri located within the boundaries of a place called Clay county Missouri, taxing jurisdiction is defined by the Congress at 4 U.S.C. CHAPTER 4 §124(12):

(12) Taxing jurisdiction.  The term “taxing jurisdiction” means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, or any territory or possession of the United States, any municipality, city, county, township, parish, transportation district, or assessment jurisdiction, or any other political subdivision within the territorial limits of the United States with the authority to impose a tax, charge, or fee.

 

This federal “government” computer generated form, labeled CLAY COUNTY PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT LIST, is from a Federal Employee named CATHY RINEHART hired by the U.S. Department of the Treasury pursuant to 31 U.S.C. Section 321 (a)(8)(c), to collect taxes:

(a) The Secretary of the Treasury shall,

(8) maintain separate accounts of taxes received in each State, territory, and possession of the United States, and collection district, with each account listing

(A) each kind of tax;

(B) the amount of each tax; and

(C) the money paid as pay and allowances to officers and employees of the Department collecting taxes in that State, territory, possession, or district.

 

The person named CATHY RINEHART; an officer of an entity named The County of Clay County Missouri 1 U.S.C. Chapter 1, within a boundary line of a place called Clay County Missouri swears an oath to “support the Constitution of the United States,” which is for the United States of America, and of the Constitution of the United States The State of Missouri, which is for Missouri of the Union the United States of America with Senators, is requesting a gift of my private property, for personal use, not located within the United State pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Chapter 12, 2511(a) to pay the debts of the United States of America pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Chapter 12 2501(c).

 

Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Chapter 12 2511(b) Intangible property is for the (2) debt obligations of (A) a United States person, or (B) the United States, a State or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia,  which are owned and held by such nonresident shall be deemed to be property situated within the United States.

 

That United States person, debtor, is defined under the statues of The State of Missouri at Chapter 400 Section 400-009-307, revised August 28, 2010, as an individual, (5 U.S.C. Chapter 5 552a (a)(2)), of a Record, (5 U.S.C. Chapter 5 552a (a)(4)), labeled DANNIE J MAEL and PATRICIA A STRICKLAND MAEL of information evidenced by, 5 U.S.C. §301 HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES IMPROVEMENTS IN IDENTIFICATION RELATED DOCUMENTS (a)(1) Standards of Acceptance by Federal Agencies.  (3) Birth Certificate (A) of (i) an individual born in the United States (B) that (i) is a copy, issued by a State or local authorized custodian of record, of an original certificate of birth issued by such custodian of record; or (ii) was issued by a State or local authorized custodian of record and was produced from birth records maintained by such custodian of record.

 

The individual, pursuant to Chapter 400 Section 400-009-307(a) RSMo revised August 28, 2010, place of business, created under a Social Security Number, (h) is the United States located within the District of Columbia but we will never be found there. Further, we, the man and woman, have never consented to such a record of information being created and held under file by any government corporate employees during our short existence as a man and woman of the Creator on the land of the Creator labeled by men North America under our unalienable rights of the Creator in our pursuit of happiness.

 

Only the Congress has the power and authority to make law, Article I Section 8 Clause 18 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, for an entity named The County of Clay County Missouri which is the territorial composition of the United States as an equivalent subdivision of The State of Missouri, 28 U.S.C. Chapter 5 HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Sections 81-131 of this chapter show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945. All references to dates were omitted as unnecessary, located within a boundary line of a place called Clay County Missouri pursuant to Chapter 46 Section 46.073 of Title IV of the revised, August 28, 2010, statutes of the state of Missouri.

 

An individual is a person over which the Congress has legislative power.  All federal gift taxes are a tax imposed on the individual over which Congress has legislative power.  That individual is found in Article IV of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 to be inhabitants and settlers of territory owned by or under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America and the 1913 Tariff Act Section G a corporation. The Corporation is defined by Congress pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Chapter 68 §6671(b) as the person with the duty to pay assessed and collected by employees of the Department of Treasury of the United States of Clay County:

(b) Person defined

The term person, as used in this subchapter, includes an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.

 

That is the person, pursuant to Article I Section 8 Clause 1 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, that Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; of this Union.

Employees of the federal government The County of Clay County Missouri have listed our private property, for personal use on land of North America, in error as a term, made up by the Congress of the United States of America, 18 U.S.C. §31(6) Motor vehicle The term motor vehicle means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power which is pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §31(10) Used for commercial purposes. The term used for commercial purposes means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit; of a 18 U.S.C. §31(9) State. The term State means a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States of a 23 U.S.C. §101 (4) County. The term county includes corresponding units of government under any other name in States that do not have county organizations and, in those States in which the county government does not have jurisdiction over highways, any local government unit vested with jurisdiction over local highways.

 

Therefore, as we are not persons who own a Motor Vehicle subject to the written laws of federal employees of  The state of Missouri, under taxing authority of the Congress of the United States of America, we cannot sign date and submit this assessment list of a property location not purchased by, ceded and titled to the United States of America.

 

Further, we will not bear false witness and state that our private property, for personal use, is not now or has it ever been sent or taken out of this state, to avoid voluntary gift taxation, as it has never been located there.

 

We, indigenous man and woman of North America freely Inhabiting a place called Missouri have all the privileges and immunities of a U.S. citizen pursuant to Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of November 15, 1777 and Article IV Section 2 Clause 1 of the Constitution of September 17, 1787, are not asking your permission to change the assessed value of any commercial tangible property located within this state.

 

We are, however, demanding that you take our private property, for personal use, off your commercial property assessment list as being a Motor Vehicle owned by a person of a territory, The County of Clay Missouri, or other property, places purchased by, ceded and titled to the United States of America used for military purposes, within this state, immediately.

>>

Dannie/Student,

This is much too complex.

Voters do not have the power to impose property taxes on others.  The power of the States of the United States to apportion property taxes is derived from Article I Section 2 Clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States:  “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers.”

There is no other source for the power to tax property in America.

Lawyer/Counsel – Ed Rivera

>>

CATHY RINEHART                                                    March 25, 2011

CLAY COUNTY ASSESSOR

1 COURTHOUSE SQUARE

LIBERTY, M0 64068

 

Re: CLAY COUNTY PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT LIST

 

DEAR CATHY RINEHART;

 

Voters do not have the power to impose property taxes on others. The power of the States of the United States to apportion property taxes is derived from Article I Section 2 Clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States: “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Number.”

 

There is no other source for the power to tax property in America.

 

CATHY RINEHART you, as with all federal employees, swear an oath to “support the Constitution of the United States,” which is for the United States of America. The State of” any County of or any City of make up the territorial composition of the United States of this Union, within a defined boundary line of map makers of a place called Missouri, owned by the United States of America of the Union with Senators.

 

These corporate entities, as a federal Constitution or Charter of United States within defined territorial limits of districts and divisions by counties, administer a place or places purchased by, ceded and titled to the United States of America used for military purposes.

 

As you always state so eloquently, in your correspondence, you are only doing your job for voters who elected you to your office under the style of the federal military laws of this state “Be it enacted by the general assembly of the state of Missouri.

 

The unwritten law of the American people, who do not vote, are not federal employees or who do not reside or labor of a place purchased by, ceded and titled to the United States of America under federal military law, is the English common law after the late Treaty of Paris of 1783.

 

Conclusion

 

The Property Location listed on your assessment is styled 5900 NE 42ND ST KANSAS CITY MO 64117 which is, the label of a Post Box for receiving notices and other communications, not a geographical location of any land mass of North America labeled the United States by Congress.  Neither we nor our private property, for personal use, will ever be found there.

 

An individual is a person over which the Congress has legislative power.  All federal taxes are a tax imposed on the individual over which Congress has legislative power. That individual is found in Article IV of the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 to be inhabitants and settlers of territory owned by or under the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States of America located within the District of Columbia defined under the 1913 Tariff Act Section G to be a corporation.

 

The person with the duty to pay Taxes, assessed and collected by federal employees of The County of Clay County Missouri, is defined by Congress pursuant to 26 U.S.C. Chapter 68 §6671(b):

(b) Person defined

The term person, as used in this subchapter, includes an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.

 

Our private properly, for personal use, is not of a business, trade, or profession carried on in the United States for the purpose of assessment and collection, of a person residing elsewhere, by any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, or any political subdivision of a State or Territory.

 

WHEREFORE, there are no oaths under the Declaration of Independence or the Articles of Confederation, we the undersigned, respectfully notice CATHY RINEHART, trusting she will not act outside of her territorial jurisdiction where she has no personal or official immunity as a matter of written law, and as a matter of a known fact.

>>

Dannie,

This is much better.

ED

>>

 

 

Posted in Right To Travel, Automobil v. Motor-Vehicle | Leave a comment

Examination Hearing = Probable Cause Hearing

Posted on April 6, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

A Examination Hearing, which is a Probable Cause Hearing is required immediately, they do not do it, it is a due process violation, such violations vacates the judgment.  And you must be invited, and must have a meaningful access and time before this court hearing.

Nebraska Statutes below:

29-1607. Information; preliminary examination; required; when.

No information shall be filed against any person for any offense until such person shall have had a preliminary examination therefor, as provided by law, unless such person shall waive his or her right to such examination, except as otherwise provided in the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. The preliminary examination shall be conducted as soon as the nature and the circumstances of the case will permit.

>>

29-504. Felony; speedy preliminary hearing required.

When the complaint is for a felony, upon the accused being brought before the magistrate, he shall proceed as soon as may be, in the presence of the accused, to inquire into the complaint.

>>

29-1812. Defects; when considered waived.

The accused shall be taken to have waived all defects which may be excepted to by a motion to quash, or a plea in abatement, by demurring to an indictment or pleading in bar or the general issue.

Objection that accused has not had preliminary examination is waived unless made before plea of not guilty is entered. Dinsmore v. State, 61 Neb. 418, 85 N.W. 445 (1901).

>>

Posted in Arraignments / Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction / Arraignments, Jurisdiction / Personal / Subject Matter, Jurisdiction / Territorial, Right To Travel, Automobil v. Motor-Vehicle, Travel / A Right / MSO, Vacate Court Orders | Leave a comment

Counsel, Right, Duty, USC proof

Posted on April 6, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

I talked with a Lawyer, he said that for 21 years he has been counsel (not attorney) for his clients, in County, State, and Federal Courts. He said the advantage to counsel is that you retain all your rights and opportunities for a full defense, especially personal jurisdiction. His bases is the following:

TITLE 42 > CHAPTER 21 > SUBCHAPTER I > §1986

Prev | Next

§1986. Action for neglect to prevent

Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, >>which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action; and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefor, and may recover not exceeding $5,000 damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.

>>which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented;<< He presents to the court as not only his clients right to counsel but in addition his duty to protect and aid his client. He tells the court that he could be prosecuted under 42 USC 1986 for not aiding this person/client in their request for assistance.

He said at times they threaten him if he receives payment for his services that that is then practicing without a Bar License. He said that is bluff, the Bible says “A laborer is worthy of his wages.” Luke 10:7

Basically the law above says you must help, the law below says you can not be forced to help without just compensation.

Anti espionage Act of 1867. It currently exists as 42 U.S.C. §1994, which is the civil provision, and 18 U.S.C. §1581, Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. ((This act forbids anyone from making a duty upon someone, such as being counsel, and not allowing them just compensation. Occasionally the government will try and limit counsel by saying one can help but can not receive compensation.)) ((I, Paul Hansen was once arrested and charged with practicing law without a license in the State of Nebraska, they tried to get me to plea to a lesser charge, I refused and added that I can not wait to get this Officer that wrote that ticket to me in the witness stand, they begged again that I accept a lesser charge, I refused again, they dismissed the charges seconds before trial. I’ll I did was told a Omaha Cop that I was a Lawyer as in common law, and had not BAR license. Welcome to Omaha Nebraska.))

>>>

RE: ((Example written by one Lawyer as he had a public defender as counsel.))

Greetings ~

Thank you for your willingness to provide me with the assistance of Counsel that I require. I intend to speak in court when I decide it necessary to give an answer, and at all times make decisions pertaining to myself and handle my affairs directly and not through agency! until and unless specifically and expressly so stated otherwise. I have NOT so stated otherwise, except for the specific limited needs expressed in this letter.

My defense, if any, will vary depending upon the jurisdiction of law that the prosecution invokes accordingly, due to the form of the following possible jurisdictions claimed: If Admiralty and Maritime, Equity, or at Common Law is its civil, criminal, or civil with criminal penalties including the specific statute, subsection, part and clause being applied to me.

1. I direct you to ensure the prosecution verbalize on the record to the court and the court verbalize to me which jurisdiction above is so aimed and have the prosecution provide the authority at law to support it.

2. I will need a Bill of Particulars from the Plaintiff/Prosecutor. I herein direct you to obtain this from the prosecution. The Bill shall contain, answer to all information requested in my Foreign Plea in Abatement/Counter Forfeiture on file in this cause.

3. I will need a complete copy of all information, communication and full Discovery with. verification from the prosecution of what that Discovery contains. I herein direct you to obtain all the items listed as well as any you know will benefit me.

a. A certified copy of the tape of the voice transmissions between the arresting officer and his dispatch officer/dispatcher, also between the arresting officer and his supervisor concerning the incident leading to and at the time of arrest i.e. inquiry at stop and executed citations

b. The arresting officer’s incident report, notes and memos.

c. A copy of all reports and evidence acquired, including written affidavits by all the officers at the scene, including all the involved agencies whether generated and/or gathered by way of computer, hand written requests an/or other data transfer methods, pertaining to all records searches.

d. A manual to interpret all coded/abbreviated reports provided.

e. A complete list of at! witnesses the prosecution intends to call at any stage of any proceeding.

f. A complete list of all evidence the prosecution plans to use against me at any stage of any proceeding.

g. A complete list of all charges the prosecution intends to charge the accused at any stage of any proceeding.

4. I will need a complete copy of the Docket (index of what has been filed with the Court). Everything is to be sent directly to me in a timely fashion so that 1 may view and scrutinize ii myself. No decisions are to be made or action taken on my behalf without my direct approval.

Your participation implies a Loyalty of Counsel, your loyalties in this matter are wholly towards me and that you have no conflicting loyalties to anyone else but me. I forbid you to communicate with any members of the Plaintiff or officers of the Court about this case without my direct instruction and/or supervision.

If you are either unable or unwilling to provide me with assistance in this case, as outlined above, please notify the Court immediately so that competent, active, zealous, and effective assistance of Counsel can be assigned in a timely manner.

Sincerely, _________________

cc; Court Records Clerk

Court Judge

Plaintiff / Prosecutor

>>

Luis Ewing uses the below to be counsel for his clients:

AUTHORITY TO PRACTICE LAW . . . WITHOUT ADMISSION. . . by the WASHINGTON STATE SUPREME COURT: RCW 2.48.190, RCW 38.38.256, 5 U.S.C. 500 (b), RCW 26.25.010, RCW 26.21.005 (19)(a) and RCW 26.21A.005 (21)(a), RCW 26.26.011 (19), RCW 26.27.021 (16), RCW 26.27.041, 18 U.S.C. 1154, 18 U.S.C 1161, 18 U.S.C. 2265, 25 U.S.C. 1301, 25 U.S.C. 1903 (4), 25 U.S.C. 1903 (8), 25 U.S.C. 1911 (a)(b)(c), 25 U.S.C. 1901 -1963 (ICW), 25 U.S.C. 3631, 43 U.S.C. 1602, 44 Fed. Reg. 67584 to 67595 (1979), RCW 2.48.170, RCW 2.48.180 (7), APR 1.1 (a), GR 24 (b)(8), Sections 3275 & 3276 of the Territorial Code of 1881. See also CR 82.5 (a) & RCW 13.34.240.

Posted in Counsel / Right to | Leave a comment