Words of Wisdom, Old sayings.

Posted on February 16, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Pearls of Wisdom/Notable Quotes/Words of Wisdom/Old sayings.

[[[ When a man considers the consequences before doing that which is right, he has already accepted a bribe. ]]]  – Paul Hansen 2007

145. We are ignorant of things we choose to ignore. Another Anonymous

144. Statism: The belief that freedom is by permission. Unknown

143. A picture is worth a thousand word, but rarely a thousand cents. Unknown

142. Patience is waiting for all the witness to leave. Ted Kennedy

141. Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry. Thomas Jefferson

140. The further a man gets from God the further a man gets from being a man. Paul Hansen

139. It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. – Mark Twain

138. The more laws, the less justice. – Marcus Tullius Cicero was born 2,111 years ago from 2005.

137. The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the chess. Chinese Proverb (First one killed by mousetrap.)

136.  It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority. – Benjamin Franklin

136. If you would not be forgotten as soon as you are dead and rotten, either write something worth reading or do something worth writing. – Benjamin Franklin

135. Life most often offers only two choices, the first being “take it”, the second “leave it”.  Paul Hansen

134. If voting changed anything, they’d make it illegal. – Emma Goldman

133. State morality is immorality. – Paul Hansen 

132. A single lie discovered is enough to create a contagious doubt over every truth expressed.  –Richard Nixon

131. According to my best recollection, I don’t remember – Vincent, Jimmy

130. But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain – that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case, it is unfit to exist. -Lysander Spooner

129. People who fly into a rage always make a bad landing. -Will Rogers

128. The difference from Anger and Danger is only one “D” letter. -Unknown

127. “Nothing” is impossible, ah, that is exactly what I do all day.  -Winnie the Pooh.

126. He who has a “Why” to live for can bear almost any “How”. -F. Nietzsche

125. “Focus on making yourself better, not on thinking that you are better.”
-Bohdi Sanders

124. Insane people swear they are sane and never question it, sane people question their own sanity daily. -Unknown

123. Many a people use thin thread when mending their ways. -Old Saying

122. Finding friends with the same mental disorder…   priceless.  -Life Long Democrat

121. We all have a role in life, you have a very special role in my life, besides some one has to be wrong.  Paul Hansen

120. Real friends are a whole lot better than a lot of just friends.  Paul Hansen

119.  More proof of biblical CONCEALED CARRY   “Better is open rebuke than love that is concealed. (Proverbs 27:5)”

118. Some say a polite society does not bear arms. Hitler has a reputation of courteously opening doors for select groups of people, they being gas chamber doors. -Paul Hansen

117. Anyone that believes in absolute depravity can not be all that bad.  -Reformed Calvinists 🙂

116. “Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both.” – Frederick Douglass, 1857

115. To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society. Theodore Roosevelt

114. Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act.—Dietrich Bonhoeffer (A theologian during Hitlers reign.)

113. Of late being apathetic is simply 88.8% pathetic. Paul Hansen

112. Light travels faster than sound, this is why people appear much brighter until the start to speak. -Observant One

111. I am not afraid of dying, I am afraid of not living. Paul Hansen

110. A lie is a lie even if everyone believes it, a the truth is the truth even if no one believes it.  Unknown

109. “Double or nothing.”  Someone that never intends on paying you anything.

108. Ye are ether one that is a regenerate or a degenerate, there is no middle ground. Paul Hansen

107. A lie can travel half way around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. – Mark Twain

106. I never forget a name that I remember. -Confusionism

105. You have heard- “eat drink and be merry for tomorrow we may die”, I say eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow we may be married. -Paul Hansen 2013

104. Any thing you say or do will be twisted against you. -State Prosecutors

103. When a panther calls, don’t anther.  -Dr Nash

102. Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.           -Frank Zappa

101. Trust me. -Satan

100. As it was in Sodom and Gomorra:
When sin-oddity become the norm, soon comes gone-a-wrya. –Paul Hansen 2013

99. If it is not broken, don’t use it. -Daycare Employee

98. What ever floats your boat. -3000 BC, Critics of Noah

97. Nowledge is power. -2013 State Educated Student

96. Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.  Mark Twain

95.  The men the American people admire most extravagantly are the greatest liars; the men they detest most violently are those who try to tell them the truth.  H.L. Mencken

94. The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule.  H.L. Mencken

93. “A more certain way to attack religion is by favor, by the comforts of life, by the hope of wealth; not by what reminds one of it, but by what makes one forget it; not by what makes one indignant, but by what makes men lukewarm, when other passions act on our souls, and those which religion inspires are silent. In the matter of changing religion, State favors are stronger than penalties.” Baron de Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws, Baron de Montesquieu (1748)

92. “We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.” -Abraham Lincoln

91. It is always the right time to do the right thing. – Martin Luther King, Jr.

90. “Paranoia is just having all the facts.” -William S. Burroughs

89. “What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.”
― Ralph Waldo Emerson

88. There is only one rule and that rule is: there is no rules. -Idiot

87. I believe everyone should be entitled to my opinion. -Mr. Know-it-all

86.  The brain is the most outstanding organ, it works 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, from birth until you fall in love.  -Observant Man

85. Whoever wishes peace among peoples must fight statism. -Ludwig von Mises

84. Never have so many listened to so few who said so much after thinking so little”- Churchill

83. Rags make paper, Paper makes money, Money makes banks, Banks make loans, Loans make poverty, Poverty makes rags. Anonymous

82. The measure of a man is not how content he is when he has much, but how content he is when he has little. Paul Hansen

81. Just as there is a vast difference from saying a god verses the God, so it is, the US is “a” government not “the” government.  Paul Hansen

80. Never change things by fighting the existing reality…to change something build anew model that makes the existing model obsolete. –  R. Bunkminster Fuller

79. In questions of power, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. – Thomas Jefferson

78. “That government is best which governs least“. – Thoreau

77.  In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated scorned.  When his cause succeeds,  however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. - Mark Twain

76. One man with courage is a majority. -Thomas Jefferson

75. One man with the law is the majority. -Luis Ewing

74. A lecture is when the information pass from the professors notes to the students notes without passing through the brain of either one.  -Stuart Crane, phd

73. The “…Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, the Habeas Corpus, trial by jury, and English common law find their most famous expression in the American Declaration of Independence.” -Winston Churchill

72. Competition is a sin.  -John D. Rockefeller

71. Gold, silver, precious metals, are a threat to confiscation of wealth.  -One world government / Federal Reserve

70. He who beats all his guns into plow shares shall be plowing the land for those who did not. -Steve Engelmeyer

69. If few men will go to the front to fight in the heat of battle, all else is meaningless. -Paul Hansen

68. If the minority is organized it will always prevail over a majority that is disorganized. -Stalin, Russia

67.  In the 1801 inaugural Thomas Jefferson said, “Sometimes it is said that man cannot be trusted with the government of himself. Can he, then, be trusted with the government of others? Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him? Let history answer this question.” And he wrote, “I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves: and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise their control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion.” [Letter, September 28, 1820.]

66. Some men stumble over the Truth but quickly pick themselves up, brush themselves off and hurry on as if nothing had happened.  -Winston Churchill

65. It is the Citizen’s first duty to question Authority.  -Benjamin Franklin

64. Never ask a US government agent where he gets his authority, he has not a clue. -Paul Hansen

63. Still, if you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed, if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not so costly, you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance for survival. There may be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no chance of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves. -Winston Churchill – The Second World War

62. We have a right to convene, but do we have the will. -Paul Hansen  (Common Law Jury)

61. A army must march for a days so that the People can for years. -Paul Hansen

60. Ballot Box or Cartridge Box, its their choice.  -Lee ____?

59. Three eternal points in antiquity of GUN CONTROL:  Point 1.   Aim.  Point 2. Steady. Point 3. Fire.  -Steve Anders

58. He who stands with God, though he be alone, shall never be a minority.  -Paul Hansen

57. A conservative is simply a liberal who has been mugged. -unknown

56. If you do not wish to stand up for your neighbors liberties, at least inform him that you are standing down. -Paul Hansen

55. God is easy to please but difficult to satisfy. -Anonymous

54. Often coincidence is a miracle in which God chooses to remain anonymous.  –God Anonymous

53. I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”  -Thomas Jefferson

52. Has it ever occurred to you that nothing has ever occurred to God. -Kent Hovind

51. Victory belongs not to the strong alone, but the vigilant and the brave.  -unknown

50. FREEDOM was not won with a REGISTERED GUN, -unknown

49. If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake should in terms renounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law of reason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacate such renunciation. The right to freedom being a gift of ALMIGHTY GOD, it is not in the
power of man to alienate this gift and voluntarily become a slave.
Samuel Adams 1772

48. America “ National or Federal? (97 pages)
Each state, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered a sovereign body, independent of all others, and only to be bound by its own voluntary act. In this relation, the new Constitution will, if established, be a federal and not a national Constitution. The Federalist, No. 39, James Madison

47. Republic or Democratic Government are liken to sheep and wolves working together.
-In a Democratic only the wolves (gov.) are armed to the teeth.
-In a Republic the sheep (people) are also well armed.

46. Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master.  -George Washington

45. Here’s my strategy on the Cold War:  We win, they lose. -Ronald Reagan

44. The most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help. -Ronald Reagan

43. The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant:
It’s just that they know so much that isn’t so. -Ronald Reagan

42. Of the four wars in my lifetime none came about because the U.S. was too strong. -Ronald Reagan

41. I have wondered at times about what the Ten Commandment’s would have looked  like if Moses had run them through the U.S. Congress. -Ronald Reagan

40. The taxpayer: That’s someone who works for the federal government but doesn’t have to take the civil service examination.  -Ronald Reagan

39. Government is like a baby: An alimentary canal with a big appetite at one end and no sense of responsibility at the other. -Ronald Reagan

38. The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program. -Ronald Reagan

37. I’ve laid down the law, though, to everyone from now on about anything that happens: no matter what time it is, wake me, even if it’s in the middle of a Cabinet meeting.  -Ronald Reagan

36. It has been said that politics is the second oldest profession. I have learned that it bears a striking resemblance to the first. -Ronald Reagan

35. Government’s view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it. -Ronald Reagan

34. Politics is not a bad profession. If you succeed there are many rewards, if you disgrace yourself you can always write a book. -Ronald Reagan

33. No arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. -Ronald Reagan

32. If we ever forget that we’re one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under. -Ronald Reagan

31. It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible. -George Washington 1752

30. Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any
portion of the foreign world…  -George Washington 1796

29. The highest glory of the American Revolution was this; it connected in one indissoluble bond the principles of civil government with the principles of Christianity.
– President John Quincy Adams 1821

28. When the people fear government you have tyranny. When government fears the people you have liberty.  -Unknown Man Killed by Government

27. If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, expects what never was and will never be. -Thomas Jefferson

26. A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.  -Thomas Jefferson

25. When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken or quit being honest. -Unknown, honest.

24. If you play it safe in life, you’ve decided that you don’t want to grow anymore. -Shirley Hufstedler

23. Americans have the right and advantage of being armed – unlike the citizens of other countries whose governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. -James Madison (1789)

22. Inflation is nothing accepted for something.  -Merrill Jenkins, 1971

21. But if you wish to be slaves of Banks and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create deposits [out of thin air]. -Sir Josiah Stamp (English Banker)

20. A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves.  -Edward R. Murrow

19. Wise men are instructed by reason; men of less understanding, by experience; the most ignorant, by necessity; the beasts, by nature.  -Marcus Tullius Cicero

18. Knowledge is power, and power is knowledge. -unknown-

17. Kings / Governments
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.  He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their substance.  -unknown

16. The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.  -Dante Alighieri

15. As in official positions of authority, ‘Corruption sinks to the top’. Generally the good men will not get promoted. -Paul Hansen 2008

14. Being Government is – never having to say what authority you have.  -Paul Hansen – 2008

13. During this election time we need to keep these in mind:
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people’s
initiative and independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they
could and should do for themselves.  -Abraham Lincoln

12. Four Classes of People:
He who knows not, and knows not that he knows not;
He who knows not, and knows that he knows not;
He who knows, but knows not that he knows; and
He who knows, and knows that he knows. -unknown

11. If there is to be trouble, let it be in my day so that my child can have peace.  – Thomas Paine

10. We have it in our power to begin the world over again.  -Thomas Paine

9. He that is in you is greater than He who is in the world. -some guy named Jesus

8. When an honestly mistaken man comes face-to-face with the truth, then he must either cease being mistaken or stop being honest. – origin unknown

7. The reason dogs have more friend than people is because they wage their tail and not their tongue. -Anonymous

6. Once government no longer fulfilled its original purpose of protecting rights and property it should be overthrown. -John Locke-  Precursor to the American Revolution.

5. Everyone dies, not everyone really lives.  -George Wallace (Irish War of Independence)

4. I want to be the man my father never was, so that my sons can have what I could not grasp, that he may become a man that I could never be.  -unknown

3. You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in their struggle for independence.  -Charles Austin Beard

2. The church has become a gathering of nominal men teaching other nominal men how to live nominally.  -Pastor Phillip G. Kayser 2009

1. When God asks questions, he is not looking for information.  -Unknown

>>>
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our
liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will
grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property
until their children wake-up ******** on the continent their fathers
conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and
restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs. -Thomas
Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin
(1802) (????)
3rd president of US (1743 – 1826)
>>
Everything predicted by the enemies of banks, in the beginning, is
now coming to pass. We are to be ruined now by the deluge of
bank paper. It is cruel that such revolutions in private fortunes
should be at the mercy of avaricious adventurers, who, instead of
employing their capital, if any they have, in manufactures,
commerce, and other useful pursuits, make it an instrument to
burden all the interchanges of property with their swindling profits,
profits which are the price of no useful industry of theirs.  “Thomas
Jefferson to Thomas Cooper, 1814. ME 14:61

Certainly no nation ever before abandoned to the avarice and
jugglings of private individuals to regulate according to their own
interests, the quantum of circulating medium for the nation — to
inflate, by deluges of paper, the nominal prices of property, and
then to buy up that property at 1s. in the pound, having first
withdrawn the floating medium which might endanger a competition
in purchase. Yet this is what has been done, and will be done,
unless stayed by the protecting hand of the legislature. The evil has
been produced by the error of their sanction of this ruinous
machinery of banks; and justice, wisdom, duty, all require that they
should interpose and arrest it before the schemes of plunder and
spoilation desolate the country.  “Thomas Jefferson to William C.
Rives, 1819. ME 15:232

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Pearls of Weirdom:

20.”radical” is defined as: “Fundamental; going to the roots
of anything.” (Webster’s Unabridged Encyclopedic
Dictionary, A.D. 1957)

19. Those who promote crime often do under pretense of
protection. -Paul Hansen (Gun Control)

18. A gun in hand is better than two in trunk.
-Paul Hansen

17. My best work is always done under pressure, mostly
because that is the only time I work. -Paul Hansen

16. The great American irony, The lunatics are in charge of
the asylum. -Chet West

15. None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who
falsely believe they are free. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

14. It is not important who votes, but who counts the vote.
-Stalin

13. A total world population of 250-300 million people, a
95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.  -Ted
Turner, Interview with Audubon magazine.

12. In today’s world, Samuel Goldwyn’s words are poignant.
> He was born in Warsaw, Poland. He made great movies
and great aphorisms, known affectionately as Goldwynisms:
>
> “A verbal contract isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.”
>
> “Anyone who goes to a psychiatrist ought to have his
head examined.”
>
> “Gentlemen, include me out.”
>
> “A wide screen just makes a bad film twice as bad.”
>
> “I can give you a definite perhaps.”
>
> “If I could drop dead right now, I’d be the happiest man
alive.”
>
> “Pictures are for entertainment. Messages should be
delivered by Western Union.”
>
> “I don’t want yes-men around me. I want everyone to tell
me the truth, even if it costs them their jobs.”
>
> “If I look confused, it’s because I’m thinking.”
>
> “You fail to overlook the crucial point.”

11. You can not fight City Hall.  -Lying Lawyer

10. If it wasn’t for lawyers we would not need lawyers.
-unknown-

9. The state is an institution built up for the sake of
exercising violence.  -Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich 1917

8. They seemingly pay us so we seemingly work.
-Russian Worker, 1990

7. One should never doubt what no one else believes.
-Willy Wonka

6. Some day the Internet will be on the World Wide Web.
-Homer Simpson

5. Their judge (governor) wears a black robe and calls them by
number.
My Judge (governor Jesus) wears a white robe and calls Me by name.
-unknown

4. He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has
already earned my contempt. He has been given a large
brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would fully
suffice. – Albert Einstein  (SEE Quotes)

3. Not everything that counts can be counted, and not
everything that can be counted counts.” (Sign hanging in
Einstein’s office at Princeton)

2. Law is simply one way the ruling class maintains its
power over the lower classes.  -Karl Marks 1870

1. The only purpose for which power can be rightly exercised
over any member of a civilized community, against his will,
is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical
or moral, is not sufficient warrant.  -John Stuart Mill 1860

‘When a man considers the consequences before doing that which is right, he has
already accepted a bribe.”  -Paul Hansen 2007

“Freedom comes at a price, but no price is to high.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

“Most people will give up some of their rights for a belief
in security, others will give up many of their rights for a
belief in security, but only a select few people will not
give up any rights for any belief in security, for all
‘rights’ are priceless gifts from God.”
-Paul Hansen 2007

“A free people claims their rights as derived from the
laws of nature, and not as the gift of their chief
magistrate.” Thomas Jefferson:  Rights of British
America, 1774. ME 1:209, Papers 1:134

“Natural rights [are] the objects for the protection of
which society is formed and municipal laws established.”
Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 1797. ME 9:422

Nothing is natural, all things come from the creator. -Paul Hansen

“A ‘police state’ is no state at all, but much less.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

“Show me a man that asks good questions, and I will
show you a man worth talking to.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

“The bigger the government is the smaller you are.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

“One mans trash is another mans garbage.”
-Paul Hansen 2005

“If you are in the right you need to stay and fight”
-Paul Hansen 2005

“You ain’t got nothing till you put God in it.” -Paul Hansen

“Knowledge is power, power is knowledge.” -unknown-

“When one man murders he is a murderer, when an
organized group does it he is a governance.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

God has designed life so that if only a small percent of
men do the right thing freedom prevails, the problem is,
they do not. -Paul Hansen 2008

“Politic defined: ‘poly’ is much or many, ‘tic’ is a blood
sucker.”  -david clarence 2007

“No one has ever accused me of being reasonable.”
-david clarence 2007

“Life is over rated, dying for what is right is not.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

“Open mined, no thanks, I would rather think.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

“Individuals should be left as free as possible to control
their own lives without government interference as long
as their behavior does not injure anyone else.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

“The power to tax ‘includes‘ the power to destroy, no
state has such power over a sovereign.”
-Paul Hansen 2008

Never use their laws and their courts to defend your
rights and your liberties. -Paul Hansen 2008

If you don’t have the facts on your side, argue the law,
and if the facts and the law are not on your side, argue
that there is a higher law which must be considered.
-Aristotle  322 B.C. (before cars)

Reality is merely an illusion.  -Paul Hansen 2008

America is a nation of institutions, are you one of the
‘committed’ to a specialized institution.” -Paul Hansen 2009

When you’re a seeing person in a blind world, it’s best to
rearrange the furniture little by little.  -Paul Hansen 2009

It ain’t that you don’t know that gets you into trouble.
It’s what you know for sure that just ain’t so.  -Mark Twain

One thing our organization lacks and that is
organization. Chet West 2009

Dis-ease is a disease we should all avoid. – unknown

How is it that a nation once under God hath become an
barackocracy obamanation. – Paul Hansen 2009

Why, one asks, if you take God out of a nation one is left with a ‘godless nation‘?  -Paul Hansen

A half truth (lie) is like a half brick, it can be thrown
twice as far, and is twice as likely to reach its target,
(believed). -unknown

When principles that run against your deepest
convictions begin to win the day, then battle is your
calling and peace has become sin; you must, at the price
of dearest peace, lay your convictions bare before friend
and enemy, with all the fire of your faith. -Abraham
Kuyper

“to attract sellout crowds, today’s churches, are in danger
of selling out the gospel.”  -Petter Jennings

Posted in Wisdom / Old Sayings / Quotes | Leave a comment

Constitution(s), Proof all 4 are in USC, Pictures

Posted on February 14, 2011 by Paul John Hansen
Slide 1

Organic Laws of the United States of America, all are active.

Showing they are in Title 1, GPO version, USC
Slide 2
Slide 3
Slide 4

Listed on this page is:                                   1. Declaration of Indippendance.                   2. Articles of Confederation.                        3. Northwest Territory Gov. -Ordinance of 1787.                                                              4. Constitution of the United States and Amendments.
Slide 5
Slide 6

WHY United States of America?
When you understand the 2nd Organic Law and then the 3rd, you will understand the United States of America, the confederacy, exercises the proprietary power over the territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America—such were the states united and formed under the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787 using that proprietary power.
(Some Lawyers will poke at your ignorance when you quote the Articles of Confederation, poke back with this-LOOK Bozo, it is still the law!  :-)  See when laws are repealed they no longer appear in the USC.
Posted in CONSTITUTIONAL, History / USA Constitution, Jurisdiction, Jurisdiction / Territorial | Leave a comment

Gun, IRS, Why you should have one.

Posted on February 12, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Dave Champions’ three clips talks of the devastation the IRS and other Government acts are, and how they are in violation of our freedom.  Dave also explains why owning a Gun (high powered rifle) increases the chance that we may never need one.

Posted in Gun / Rights / Law, IRS | Leave a comment

Jurisdiction -citizens, nationals or residents

Posted on February 12, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

The case below shows how not rebutting “citizen”, “national” or “resident” of the US can give jurisdiction. People are most often NOT US  citizens, nationals or residents therefore are not subject to many laws specific to the US jurisdiction (Land & Subjects). One can be on Nebraska Land not owned or ceded to the USA, therefore not a USA Possession / territory, yet be subject to laws they normally would not be subject to just because they did not rebut the US prosecutors / attorneys statement/presumption of being a citizens, nationals or residents of the US, even when there is fact evidence the act was not done on US proprietorially held land.

So if we get a parking ticket, or any charge, that is not on their land, State of Nebraska, but was sited on Nebraska Land, we must clearly state “I am not a resident (citizen, national or resident) of the USA, or any subdivision thereof, such as the State of Nebraska, City of Omaha, County of Douglas, etc.

To see the core of this case just scroll down to the highlighted paragraph.

>>>

As a recent Congressional Research Service report explains, crime is ordinarily proscribed, tried, and punished according to the laws of the place where it occurs. American criminal law applies beyond the geographical confines of the United States, however, under certain limited circumstances. . . . A surprising number of federal criminal statutes have extraterritorial application, but prosecutions have been few. This may be because when extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction does exist, practical and legal complications, and sometimes diplomatic considerations, may counsel against its exercise.

Charles Doyle, Extraterritorial Application of American Criminal Law, Congressional Research Service (March 26, 2010). This post is about a recent decision that issued in U.S. v. Daniels, 2010 WL 2557506 (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California 2010).

On August 27, 2009, a federal grand jury in California returned a nine-count indictment charging Donald Daniels, Martin Washburn, Tapani Koivunen and Irina Rebegeneau with committing and conspiring to commit wire fraud, mail fraud and money laundering in violation of federal law. U.S. v. Daniels, supra. On October 1, 20009, the grand jury returned a superseding indictment that re-charged these counts but added two: “Counts 10 and 11, against Daniels, Washburn and [Sergei] Shkurkin, for using and conspiring to use extortionate means to collect or attempt to collect any extension of credit in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 894.” U.S. v. Daniels, supra. These defendants then moved to dismiss Counts 10 and 11 on the theory that applying section 894 under such circumstances constitutes an impermissible extraterritorial application of the extortion statute,” i.e., that this district court could not legally exercise jurisdiction over such conduct.” U.S. v. Daniels, supra.

Before we can analyze their argument, the government’s response and the court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss, I need to outline how the charges arose:

Washburn was the president of FoodPro International, Inc.; Rebegeneau was a project manager/engineer at FoodPro; and Koivunen was the chief executive officer of Global Sierra Management, LLC. In 2003, FoodPro and GSM, along with AS Vahenurme Agro (`ASV’), an Estonian company owned by Finnish partners, formed Global Sierra Partners, LLC (`GSP’), a Nevada corporation. . . . created with the intent of opening a state-of-the-art milling and bakery operation in Estonia.

GSP sought a loan from [OPIC], a [U.S.] agency that provides financing . . . to encourage participation in foreign business projects. . . . OPIC [agreed to] provide an $8.9 million small business loan to GSP, and GSP would contribute $7.6 million in equity investment to the project. FoodPro would provide $3.8 million cash, ASV would provide $700,000 cash and $2 million in property contributions, and GSM would provide $1 million cash. . . .

The members of GSP devised a scheme [to] procure a short-term loan of $4.5 million from entities controlled by Daniels, . . . so GSP would appear to possess the financing it had promised OPIC it would procure. Once GSP received the loans from OPIC, GSP would return the money to Daniels, rather than invest it in the bakery. Daniels agreed to provide the short-term loan in exchange for 25% interest, which would ultimately result in a $1.15 million payment from GSP to Daniels. . . .

[By] October 2004, Daniels had become unhappy with the pace at which he was being repaid . . . . Daniels, Washburn and Shkurkin (a business associate of Daniels) devised a plan to convince the Finnish partners that Daniels’ money came from the Russian mafia and to threaten the Finnish partners with bodily harm unless they quickly paid the remaining $650,000 owed to Daniels. To effectuate the plan, Daniels asked Arkady Zalan, a high-level employee at FoodPro, if he knew anyone in the Russian mafia. Although Zalan did not know anyone in the Russian mafia, he ultimately contacted a man known as Gennadi, who lived in Israel.

On October 20, 2004, Washburn sent an email to the Finnish partners, . . . stating that representatives for the investors, including two Americans . . . and one Russian (Gennadi), wanted a face-to-face meeting to address . . . the loan agreement. In a follow up email sent the next day by Shkurkin to Koivunen (and copied to Washburn, Zalan and the Finnish partners), Shkurkin stated `[y]ou [the Finnish partners] knew exactly what you were getting into. We were very clear. . .

On November 15, 2004, a meeting of the GSP Board of Directors took place at a hotel in Helsinki, Finland. In attendance were Washburn, Zalan, Koivunen, the Finnish partners, Shkurkin and Gennadi. Prior to the meeting, Daniels deposited $5,000 into Zalan’s bank account to pay for Gennadi’s expenses. . . . [and] Zalan, Washburn and Shkurkin crafted a statement for Gennadi to read to the assembled Board.

At the meeting, Gennadi read the statement, which, . . . [said] that if the remaining $650,000 were not paid by GSP to Daniels, it would be collected from GSP and GSP’s members by `all means necessary.’ The Finnish partners described this as a mafia-style threat. . . .

U.S. v. Daniels, supra. As I noted above, this threat was the basis of the 18 U.S. Code § 894 against the defendants listed above. They argued, basically, that the threat was made in a foreign county, so the U.S. federal court didn’t have jurisdiction over the extortion charge. The government claimed the court had jurisdiction because overt acts that aided and abetted the threat occurring in the U.S. U.S. v. Daniels, supra. As the judge noted, the government relied on the theory of territorial jurisdiction, under which the U.S. can assert jurisdiction over a crime if the crime, or part of the crime, occurred in U.S. territory. U.S. v. Daniels, supra. The court explained that to rule on the motion to dismiss, it had to decide what conduct violates 894 and then decide if part of that conduct occurred in the U.S. U.S. v. Daniels, supra.

Section 894 makes it a crime for anyone to knowingly participate[] in any way . . . in the use of extortionate means to . . . attempt to collect any extension of credit.” It defines extortionate means as any means which involves the use, or an express or implicit threat of use, of violence or other criminal means to cause harm to the person, reputation, or property of any person. 18 U.S. Code § 891(7). The court noted that by making anyone who participate[s] in any way in such activity liable, Congress evinced an intent to reach a broad range of conduct. U.S. v. Daniels, supra.

The judge then found that all three defendants participated in such activity: Daniels wired $5,000 to a bank account controlled by Zalan with the intent that Zalan use the funds to finance Gennadi’s travel to . . . Helsinki. Moreover, the purpose of the extortion scheme was to threaten the Finnish partners into repaying Daniels’ loan to a bank account in the United States. Washburn sent an email from the United States to, among others, the Finnish partners in order to arrange the meeting in Helsinki, with full knowledge that the threat would be delivered at the meeting. Shkurkin sent a vaguely threatening email from the United States to . . . the Finnish partners informing them that he would be attending the Helsinki meeting on behalf of Daniels.

U.S. v. Daniels, supra. The judge found that this activity, standing alone, gave the court jurisdiction over Counts 10 and 11. U.S. v. Daniels, supra. The court also noted that Congress intended for § to be applied extra-territorially, but that this, in and of itself, did not establish that international law would allow it to be applied in that fashion. U.S. v. Daniels, supra.

The judge explained that under international law five principles allow a sovereign to exercise extraterritorial criminal jurisdiction:

(1) territorial, wherein jurisdiction is based on the place where the offense is committed; (2) national, wherein jurisdiction is based on the nationality or national character of the offender; (3) protective, wherein jurisdiction is based on whether the national interest is injured; (4) universal, which amounts to physical custody of the offender; and (5) passive personal, wherein jurisdiction is based on the nationality or national character of the victim.

U.S. v. Daniels, supra (citing Chua Han Mow v. U.S., 730 F.2d 1308 (U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit 1984). The judge found that in this case exercising jurisdiction

is justified pursuant to the territorial and national principles of extraterritoriality. Firstly, . . . while the actual threat in this case was delivered overseas, much of the preparatory work was completed within the United States. Furthermore, the intended effects of the conspiracy — to recover money for Daniels that would be deposited in the United States — would have impacted the United States. Pursuant to the territorial principle of extraterritoriality, courts have frequently held that where a crime is committed outside of the United States, but its effects are felt within the United States, a federal criminal law may apply extraterritorially. . . . Secondly, Daniels, Washburn and Shkurkin all appear to be citizens, nationals or residents of the United States and no evidence to the contrary has been presented. The government therefore has a recognized and valid interest in prosecuting them for misdeeds committed outside of the country.

U.S. v. Daniels, supra. Finally, the judge found it was reasonable for the U.S. to exercise jurisdiction over the activity at issue in Counts 10 and 11 because it was strongly linked to the U.S., the U.S. has a strong connection with the defendants given their nationality, there was little if any risk that exercising jurisdiction would conflict with the interests of another state and exercising jurisdiction was consistent with the traditions of the international system.” U.S. v. Daniels, supra.

While the judge noted that there can be no doubt that Finland likely has a strong interest in regulating the conduct at issue in this case, he found that all of the other relevant factors favor finding that the exercise of jurisdiction is reasonable. U.S. v. Daniels, supra.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

territorial jurisdiction, Law Definition

n-The geographical area over which a government or governmental subdivision has power. Webster’s New World Law Dictionary

>>

>>

Territorial jurisdiction is the court’s power to bind the parties to the action. This law determines the scope of federal and state court power. State court territorial jurisdiction is determined by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and the federal court territorial jurisdiction is determined by the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment.

14th Amendment

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Section 5.

The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

>

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

>>

Sep11 BEATING AN ATTORNEY AT LAW IN HIS OR HER OWN COURT

Filed Under COMMON LAW, LAW OF THE LAND | Leave a Comment

Attorneys are licensed to practice in only one kind of law in one place: written law in territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.

To practice law in the State of California, an attorney and counselor at law must be admitted to the State Bar of California, which means that attorney must be admitted to practice before the highest court in the State of California, the Supreme Court of the State of California.

When I was practicing law in California, I won my last two civil cases by simply denying that my client, who was the alleged defendant, was a resident of the County of Los Angeles. To establish the court’s jurisdiction, the plaintiff’s attorney had to plead and prove my client’s residency in the County of Los Angeles, which he could not do, as there is little habitable territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America in that county.

Dr. Eduardo M. Rivera ((They disbarred him soon after. They will allow no Attorney to consider their client over the needs of the state/IRS.))

>>Also SEE>

States v. Mundt, 29 F.3d 233, 237 (6th Cir. 1994) – the court rejected “patently frivolous” argument that defendant was not a resident of any “federal zone” and therefore not subject to federal income tax laws. ((I need to research the type of activity this defendant was for them to secure jurisdiction as to income tax.    On the surface it appeared that this man challenged by not doing business on a federal Land, yet they stuck him for not rebutting citizen, national or resident of the US. ))

>>

Nebraska Revised Statute 44-2702, definition

(13) “Resident means any person to whom a contractual obligation is owed who resides in this state at the date of entry of…” ((Just as an example of a NE statute.  Remember what in this state is defined as, see below.))

Nebraska Revised Statute 42-702 Definitions (21) State means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

>

Click on the below for key case law:

(Some laws are for state Citizens, some for only United States citizens.

US CITIZEN V. STATE CITIZEN

Posted in Jurisdiction / Personal / Subject Matter, Jurisdiction / Territorial | Leave a comment

Text Reader, Anonymous Announcements

Posted on February 11, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

http://www.naturalreaders.com/features.htm

FREE

This is pretty cool, it is a small download, you can cut and past books to it and it will read to your students, or any application such as reading to you as you travel.  Just down load it to your laptop, cut and past a large article or news clip.

I just used it co contact a hostile tenant by anonymous announcements.

I just cut and pasted the Articles of Confederation and it worked great.

You can even speed read with it.

On the side you can put in up to 500 word and have them spoken in several dialects and languages, great for fun messages, or a creative voice mail greeting.

Posted in Software | Leave a comment

Child Support, Jurisdiction

Posted on February 9, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Marriage License
Contract
General Law
NO Debtors Prison
Constitutionally Bared
Government Regulated
Jurisdiction
Common Law

Ollie says; “Well, here’s another nice mess you’ve gotten us into!

You are summons to appear for a child support hearing.
Four people are brought before the court and one by one they are sent to jail for being behind on child support.

You are brought up next, judge asked if you want to go to jail like the rest of them.  Your trusted A$$orney begs the court to allow for a signed promise (contract) to keep his client out of jail. The judge says take your client to the side and see what can be agreed upon. Your high paid Attorney then says the only way to stay out of jail is to sign a document for the court that states an agreement to pay a specific amount of child support. You trust your all wise and knowing counselor at law and sign.
You are now in a written agreement (contract) with the court and if you breach that contract there will be hell to pay including jail time.

After 18 years of paying inflated (statutory) child support and living in poverty as the mother of your son is buying a new car every year, taking extravagant vacations, and enjoying her/your new home, you then learn the following:
a. The court had no jurisdiction (unless you had/have a marriage license) over you as to the amount of child support as long as you were making monthly payments for child support. The amount should be reasonable, some have paid as little as $10.00 per month.
(This in most cases is not right but the point is the court has no authority to determine the amount as long as it is $10.00 each and every month or more. [Warning – Never, ever, skip a payment. And pay my money order, copy the full money order, all filled out, with payment for child support of CHILDES NAME, have it mailed by a disinterested party that will give you an affidavit of mailing for you to retain. One can also record the mailing as I do HERE > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQcQvNtCqyQ   ])
b. The court had no jurisdiction as to the amount until you contracted.  (Signed your
life away.)
c. After the creation of the contract, the court then acquired jurisdiction to enforce the
agreement between you and the court. US courts only enforce two things, US written law (marriage license), and contracts (promises to pay).
d. Your Attorney sold you out, and got paid very well for it, and probably had a good laugh about it as he played golf with the Judge and the county Prosecutor after your hearing that same day.
>>
Remember one can never be put in jail for owing a debt ((unless he waives (contracts away) that constitutional protection)).
((All of the 50 states have a “no debtors prison” provision in there charter/constitution in order to be a republic form of government.
Sure they can take your “driving privilege away” but they can never take away your “right to travel”, and “right to work”, you just need the right legal arguments.
You can be smart and study the truth and know your rights, or you can be afraid and keep paying everything they demand. The truth shall set you free, not what “they say” is the truth! Remember you have a right to petition ‘their’ government. They must answer or default. The Internet is full of people that are experiencing the same thing you are. Beware most thing on the Internet are bad information when it comes to law, so be wise and sort out the good from the bad, believe me, it is possible, God does supply. Freedom comes at a price, but no price is too high.

More Latter.

Contact me as to my ‘money argument’ where the state can not force you to pay anything with ‘federal reserve notes’. I have saved tens of thousands for myself and clients with that brief/challenge.

>>

Another new subject matter jurisdictional challenge is that you challenge the court to produce evidence on the record that it has territorial jurisdiction, as proprietary jurisdiction, as to where the alleged acts took place. Read other links in this site as dealing with jurisdiction, and marriage license. 

>>


Posted in Child Support | Leave a comment

Trespass v.Trespassing, legal distinction.

Posted on February 9, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Consider “KEEP OUT”, “KEEP OFF”.        (Note> put non-statutory signs up also, see below.) 

A law student said there was a legal distinction, (My first thought is that it can not be true.) seeing is believing, he is right, so post your property correctly to keep the 2 legged pests off your land.

(Trespass = People) (Trespassing =Livestock)  So essentially you could own a large ranch and let people cross but bar herds of livestock.

Basically he said that this is a usage of words that the government can play as an ace up their sleeve to draw if they ever get charged with “trespass

ing“.  The court will rule against the non-government complaint and never say why.  Even if appealed all the way to the Supreme court the guy will lose because he posted “NO TRESPASSING” instead of “NO TRESPASS”.
Of course the judges will still rule against other individuals but the ace is pulled only when needed to protect their own.     There is legal power in words!  So just blot out the “ing” to stop those pesky two legged varmints. 

I got on the Internet and could not find one correct “NO Trespass” sign, all were “Trespassing”.

Some say No Trespassing = you are on the land and are now told not to do it again, but No Trespass = do not come on the land in the first place.

Below you will see that the legislative body makes a distinction.

Nebraska,  Section 28-521
Revised Statutes    Chapter 28
Criminal trespass, second degree; penalty.
(1) A person commits second degree criminal trespass if, knowing that he is not licensed or privileged to do so, he enters or remains in any place as to which notice against trespass is given by:
(a) Actual communication to the actor; or
(b) Posting in a manner prescribed by law or reasonably likely to come to the attention of intruders; or
(c) Fencing or other enclosure manifestly designed to exclude intruders.
(2) Second degree criminal trespass is a Class III misdemeanor, except as provided for in subsection
(3) of this section.
(3) Second degree criminal trespass is a Class II misdemeanor if the offender defies an order to leave personally communicated to him by the owner of the premises or other authorized person.

Source:
Laws 1977, LB 38, § 120.
>>

Nebraska, Section 54-403
Revised Statutes    Chapter 54
Trespassing animals; distraint; notice.
When any such stock is found upon the lands of another, it is lawful for the owner or person in possession of such lands to impound such stock. If the owner of the stock can be found, and is known to the distrainor, it is the duty of the distrainor to notify the owner by leaving a written notice at his or her usual place of residence with some member of the family over the age of fourteen or, in the absence of such person, by posting on the door of such residence a copy of the notice of the distraint of the stock, describing it, and stating the amount of damages claimed and the name of the arbitrator. The notice shall also require the owner within forty-eight hours after receiving such notice to take the stock away,
after making full payment of all damages and costs to the satisfaction of the distrainor of trespassing animals. The notice may be in the following form:
You are hereby notified that on this …………… day of ………….. 20…., your stock, of which I now have in my possession …………… (here describe the animal or animals) did trespass upon my land, and damage it to the amount of …………… . You are required to pay the above charges within forty-eight hours from the delivery of this notice or the stock will be sold as provided by law. I have appointed …………… to act as arbitrator should you not feel satisfied with the amount of damages claimed in the within notice.
No claim for damages shall be maintained by the distrainor without the notice contemplated in this section having been given when the owner is known by the distrainor of such stock.

Source:
Laws 1871, § 3, p. 120;
>>

Remember if you want to stay out of the corporate world put up signs that read “NO TRESPASS, KEEP OUT, KEEP OFF, non-statutory”.  The sheriff will enforce non-statutory rights and liberties to private lands.  Statutory brings in the corporate police and their equity courts, which are more of a crucifixion court.  And if you have “nons-” up do not go to a statutory court to enforce it!
>>

One can make their own sign of NO TRESPASS, and put some type of wording as to Common Law enforcement to stay clear of a presumption of alliance on the USA government.  Because in all reality statutory (written law) is for only land governed by proprietary ownership by the USA, which your private property most likely is not.

>>

Posted in Trespass v. Trespassing | Leave a comment

TOP SECRET ARMY VIDEO THE PENTAGON WONT RELEASE

Posted on February 9, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

US Raping Western Asia, and others, crimes untold, are we funding an evil tyrant.

Posted in USA the Tyrant? | Leave a comment

Federal Reserve Clip #1.

Posted on February 1, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

Federal Reserve-               Clip #1

>>

Posted in Federal Reserve #1 | Leave a comment

Jurisdiction / Territorial / Brief(s)

Posted on January 29, 2011 by Paul John Hansen

NO A-10-000983

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF NEBRASKA

STATE OF NEBRASKA, Plaintiff, Appellee

v.

Paul John Hansen, Defendant, Appellant

As a common law notice to the captioned case Court as to its lack of territorial jurisdiction.

Evidenced by the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, declaring that these thirteen united colonies are, and of right be free and independent states.  One of those states eventually grafted in to the said free states is a Land called Nebraska, as my Land is located which is the subject of this case.

Nebraska is “[L]and” inhabited by “free inhabitants”, as this Appellant is, as the term “free inhabitant” is found in Article IV of the Articles of Confederation, dated November 15, 1777, to which no evidence exist as it being replaced, repealed or “superseded” by any Constitution, which is contrary to what the Appellee claims in their 1-26-2011 Response Brief, on line 4 of page 27.

The Appellee’s Attorney Mr. Getty is unfortunately ignorant of the organic laws of the Nebraska Land which is added to the perpetual Union.  Getty appears to misunderstand that the United States, as to territorial jurisdiction, is not all the Land within the interior borders of Nebraska, but is in fact only the Land that is owned by the United States of America, the confederacy, within the same said borders, Land identified in the State of Nebraska Revised Statutes as “in this state” or “within the state”.

Getty has been faultily informed, and perpetually ignores, the fact that there are only two types of Land within the said Nebraska Land exterior borders, that is [L]and owned by the United States of America which is called the United States and the other is [L]and NOT owned by the United States of America and therefore is not Land called the United State.

Getty also lacks understanding that there is only two form of law operating in the said Nebraska interior borders, one being United States written Laws, operating on US Land, and the other is the unwritten English common law, operating on non-US Land.

It is a fact that the Douglas County Court is a statutory court, clearly a limited jurisdictional court, as is true with all United States Courts.  The United States is land, assets, and property, owned by the United States of America.    All governments upon the Land called Nebraska are a creation of what is now called the United States of America, the confederacy, pursuant to the first Organic Laws of the United States of America titled the Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776, and the Articles of Confederation November 15, 1777.

The US Constitution of September 17, 1787, and the Northwest Ordinance of July 13, 1787, made a territorial government permanent, historically referenced as “the more perfect Union”, thus creating a separate government (Legislative Congress of the United States) to govern the same (owned) limited territory, land, assets, property, and subjects, on this same said Land.  All Government deriving it’s authority from this 1787 Constitution have specific limited jurisdiction to [o]nly Land that constitutes it’s holdings, and to go beyond it’s personal holdings (Land) is unconstitutional, forbidden, by the very source of their authority, mainly the free inhabitants.

“US Code, Sections 81 – 131  show the territorial composition of districts and divisions by counties as of January 1, 1945,” so each “Section” from 81 to 131 shows the territorial composition of every class of “District,”  two of these listed are [88 District of Columbia] and [107 Nebraska].  It follows that each of the 48 States will contain territory equal (consistent with) to Section [88 District of Columbia], which consists of territory owned by and ceded to the United States of America.  This code is here because all written law must contain specific direct statements of its exact territorial limitations.

The State of Nebraska is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land that consists of the [L]ands that are called the State of Nebraska, which is a distinctly different Land than that of “Nebraska” or the “state of Nebraska” which is Land not owned by the United States of America.

Abe Lincoln once said, “You can fool some of the people some of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”  Well I am one of the “all of the people”.   The Nebraska revised statutes have many very interesting statute(s) under “definitions”, giving evidence to specificly identify Land that is subject to the exclusive lurisdiction of the United States of America government, listing only a few as follows:

Nebraska Revised Statute 42-702 Definitions     (21) State means a state of the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

Nebraska Revised Statute 30-2209 Definitions    (44) State includes any state of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession subject to the legislative authority of the United States.

Nebraska Revised Statute 60-666, State, defined        (DMV)                                           State shall mean a state, territory, or possession of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or a province of Canada.

Nebraska Revised Statute 77-2701.17.   In this state or within the state means within the exterior limits of the State of Nebraska and includes all the territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.  (Revenue Statutes, Sales and Property Taxes.) (Includes means specifically.)

The above statutes are fact evidence that lands, that various statutes apply to, is specific in location and ownership.  The Appellee has/had the burden to prove/provide with fact evidence, upon the record, when he was timely challenged, that this Appellants Land is in fact land subject to the statutes in the original Complaint of this case.  Appellant refused to even attempt to supply such facts, on the face of the record, for such attempt would be the demise of the States case.

All written laws, such as municipal codes, state statutes, etc., of government within the exterior borders of the Land called Nebraska, are Laws for the United States, and said legislative laws are only legislated for the same United States Land as owned and governed by the United States of America by virtue of being the proprietor (owner) of that same Land.

I, the Appellant, having properly challenged the Appellee many times in the proceeding of this case to produce evidence that the said Land is land that is within the jurisdiction of the City of Omaha Municipal Code, the City of Omaha, which has irrefutable, limited, specific jurisdiction only upon Land that is owned or ceded to the United States of America.  That unfulfilled burden yet resides with the Appellee, so says the same Courts utilized by the Appellee.

Paulsen v. Paulsen, 658 N.W.2d 49, Neb.App.,2003
A plaintiff must plead and prove the jurisdictional facts, the facts which show that the court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action.

In re Interest of Kelly D., 3 Neb. App. 251, 526 N.W.2d 439 (1994). When a lower court lacks power, that is, subject matter jurisdiction, to adjudicate merits of acclaim, issue, or question, an appellate court also lacks power to determine the merits of the claim, issue, or question presented to the lower court.

SMJ Can Not Be Waived [U] Quality Pork International v. Rupari Food Services, Inc., No. A-01-1203 (Neb.App. 05/13/2003)
While the lack of subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived nor the existence of subject matter jurisdiction conferred by the consent or conduct of the parties,

Subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law for the court. A jurisdictional question which does not involve a factual dispute is determined by an appellate court as a matter of law, which requires the appellate court to reach a conclusion independent of the lower court’s decision. Hoschor v. Hoschor, 254 Neb. 743, 580 N.W.2d
516 (1998).

A judgment entered by a court which lacks subject matter jurisdiction is void. It is the longstanding rule in Nebraska that such a void judgment may be raised at any time in any proceeding. Bradley v. Hopkins, 246 Neb. 646, 522 N.W.2d 394 (1994); VonSeggern v. Willman, 244 Neb. 565, 508 N.W.2d 261 (1993).

The party invoking jurisdiction bears the burden of proof that all prerequisites to jurisdiction are satisfied. Hatridge v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 415 F.2d 809, 814 (8th Cir. 1969).

STATE of Missouri ex rel. Eddie TOLLIVER, Relator-Respondent,  v.  BOARD OF PUBLIC SERVICE OF the CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Missouri, et al., Respondents-Appellants.  No. 33600 (1970)  “An inferior tribunal’s actions are confined to the specific authority given it, and in a direct challenge to its action all facts necessary to give it jurisdiction must appear on the face of its record.”

Concluding:

Therefore overturn each and every charge for the lack of jurisdiction as found on the face of the record.  This court lacks all authority except to overturn all judgments associated with this case.

With no evidence of Territorial jurisdiction which is subject matter jurisdiction, the Appellee had no cause to disturbed me in anyway, therefore being that all charges are predicated on territorial jurisdiction and such evidence is lacking all charges must be like wise lacking warrant / justification / jurisdiction.

As a free inhabitant  _______________________ 1-29-2011

Paul John Hansen

Posted in Jurisdiction / Territorial | Leave a comment